The advantages and disadvantages sections look like the product of quibbling over the content of the article, but they were there since the first revision. Presenting pros and cons in this cleanly broken down fashion takes away from what could be a more insightful discussion of wikipolitics. No offense to User:Anhhung18901 (writer of most of the article)--if there was an easy way to combine these sections into a discussion, rather than two laundry lists, I would have done it myself. The content is good factually; the next step is to make a more coherent, readable article. -- Ldrhcp 06:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Clean this up and we'll put it back in the article namespace. Fred Bauder 01:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Better than television! Give it a look ... Commons:National Archives and Records Administration/Categorize Djembayz ( talk) 15:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)
The advantages and disadvantages sections look like the product of quibbling over the content of the article, but they were there since the first revision. Presenting pros and cons in this cleanly broken down fashion takes away from what could be a more insightful discussion of wikipolitics. No offense to User:Anhhung18901 (writer of most of the article)--if there was an easy way to combine these sections into a discussion, rather than two laundry lists, I would have done it myself. The content is good factually; the next step is to make a more coherent, readable article. -- Ldrhcp 06:04, 7 July 2006 (UTC)
Clean this up and we'll put it back in the article namespace. Fred Bauder 01:14, 11 July 2006 (UTC)
Better than television! Give it a look ... Commons:National Archives and Records Administration/Categorize Djembayz ( talk) 15:34, 27 October 2012 (UTC)