Selam , Türk karşıtı kullanıcı Khoikhoi ingilizce wikipedia'da adminlik için şansını deniyor.Daha fazla türk gelirse bunu engelleyebiliriz. Oyunu burdan kullanabilirsin Teşekkürler. ( 85.97.143.5 18:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC))
Hallo Araneophilus! Ich befürchte, ich kann Deine Frage nicht befriedigend beantworten, weil ich mich weniger um die arabische Schrift und Sprache kümmere, als um inhaltliche Dinge, was vor allem den Themenbereich Sufismus betrifft. Soviel aber kann ich Dir mitteilen: Es existiert in der deutschen Wikipedia die Seite Wikipedia:Namenskonventionen/Arabisch. Oder lies mal im Artikel Arabische Schrift oder klicke Dich von dort aus durch. Außerdem meine ich, daß Dir evtl. Benutzer:Orientalist weiterhelfen könnte. Wenn nicht, dann kann vielleicht auch er Dich "weiterreichen". Viele Grüße, Mounir (deutsche WP) | Mounir (englische WP) 20:29, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
P.S.: Du gibst auf Deiner deutschen und englischen Benutzseite Dein Englischniveau mit 2 an, aber hier auf Anglo-Araneophilus mit 1. Ich denke, es handelt sich da nur um einen Tippfehler, oder?
Hallo! Zu Deiner Frage: "Wie kann man denn seine Tilden (mit dem Erfolg von Account- und Datumsangabe) mit einem englischen Account in der deutschen WP setzen?" - Also: Ich kann es auch nicht, auch wenn es im ersten Moment so ausschaut. Ich hatte Dir ja auf dieser englischen Diskussionsseite eine Antwort geschrieben, also sind Datum etc. aus der englischen Wikipedia. Da ich aber immer meine Antworten noch einmal auf meiner eigenen Diskussionsseite direkt zu der dazugehörenden Frage einfüge, damit dort die "Unterhaltung" auch als solche gelesen werden kann, wurde eben in diesem Fall das UTC-Datum mit rüberkopiert. Ganz einfach, hatte ich auch gar nicht so geplant... Und den Link zur eigenen Benutzerseite hatte ich manuell eingetippt. Wenn Du jetzt und hier auf "Seite bearbeiten" klickst, dann kannst Du sehen, was man da eingeben muß. Aber das weißt Du eigentlich eh schon, weil Du soviel ich meine, Deine englische Unterschrift auch schon in meine deutsche Diskussion gesetzt hast. Grüße, -- Mounir 08:22, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
Danke für den Tipp, ich habe den Link hinzugefügt. Da ich sowieso Deutscher bin, kannst du mir also ruhig in deutsch auch schreiben ;-) Aus deinem Benutzernamen entnehme ich, daß du Spinnenliebhaber bist, ich habe u.a. ein paar Fotos Kappadokischer Spinnen auf meiner Insektenseite, wenn du Lust hast, schau mal rein...-- ✉ katpatuka →
Seltsamer_Edit - Hallo tickle! Danke für Aufklärung, Link und deine sorgfältige Arbeit am Thema.: Ich habe seit einiger Zeit Probleme mit einigen usern wegen meiner Teilnahme an Diskus bzw. Edits zu Völkermord an den Armeniern oder islambezogenen Themen. Mein Fehler hier hat desw. ziemlich gehässige Reaktionen auf meiner Disku zu Folge (Ich versteh nur noch Bahnhof. Bei türkischen Begriffen entfernst du die Sonderzeichen...). In dieser Hinsicht wäre es nett, wenn du deinen berechtigten Dank an PJacoby um obige Bemerkung ergänzen könntest, es ist sonst IMO etwas mißverständlich. -- tickle me 07:01, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
Dein Bemühen um den Artikel "Yörük" zeigt, dass es sich lohnt, meine Fassung genau anzusehen. Dabei, denke ich, bist du mit deinen Änderungen etwas über das Ziel hinausgeschossen. So meine ich, dass keine Verweise auf die Literatur im Text sein sollten. Es ist in Enzyklopädieartikeln entgegen wissenschaftlichen Essays nicht üblich. Zudem halte ich es nicht für angebracht, z. B. bei Kunze die einzelnen Aufsätze anzuführen. Die Literaturangaben sollen einen ersten Einstieg ermöglichen, nicht mehr! Manche Textteile, die du versucht hast zu präzisieren, waren von mir bewusst in der Schwebe gehalten. Dadurch konnte manchmal mehr ausgesagt werden als mit z. B. zeitlich eingeschränkten Angaben. Den Völkermord an den Armeniern sollte man in diesem Artikel nicht erwähnen. Er hat hier keine Relevanz und provoziert nur einen zu erwartenden Edit-war.
Beste Grüße --
84.149.218.254 (Wetwassermann)
06:55, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Post your suggestions of changes for the Ottoman Armenian casulties. Thanks Fad (ix) 16:31, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Hallo Anglo-Araneophilus, ich glaube Du wolltest mehr Info zu Souchons Dienstgrad haben. Souchon war Konteradmiral, als er die Goeben und Breslau nach Konstantinopel brachte. Ansomsten kann ich nur noch hinzufügen, dass er am 29. Oktober 1916 den "Pour le Merite" erhielt und zu diesem Zeitpunkt meines Wissens Vizeadmiral war. Ob er danach eine weitere Beförderung zum Admiral erhielt, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Cosal 12:22, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Auf der deutschen WP stört sich mal wieder jemand (Decius) an deinem Asker-Artikel. Schau mal bei Gelegenheit rein, ich weiss nicht, ob ich es alleine schaffe, ihn zu beruhigen. -- Mustafa Mustamann 19:24, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Ich habe gerade diese Nachricht auf ihren deutschen Diskussionsseiten hinterlassen !
ich würde ihnen gern eine email schicken aber das geht leider nicht mehr, - vielleicht sind Sie ja so nett mir [ http://www.ifgg.uni-karlsruhe.de/index.php.cgi/ger/personen/akad_mitarbeiter_innen/dr_christophe_neff ] dort eine Nachricht zu hinterlassen. Ich habe gerade so mitbekommen, was da alles geschehen ist, und ich bin wirklich perplex ! viele herzliche Grüße Christophe Neff 22:33, 7. Jun. 2008 (CEST) Vielleicht sind Sie ja so nett und geben mir ein feed-back ! herzliche grüße Christophe Neff ( talk) 20:38, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
WhiteWriter speaks 11:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
I added infobox. If you can add some more data, or solve name chaos, that would be quite useful. What do you think, what should be do with the name? It looks like Ibar bridge is quite common also... -- WhiteWriter speaks 17:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Images from 17th-18th March 2004. Just as info, and confirmation that it was there. -- WhiteWriter speaks 20:25, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
WhiteWriter speaks 21:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I added the missing data. Thank you. ( Mazidan ( talk) 11:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC))
Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:August 2013 Rabaa Massacre for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. This is a level-2 warning/notification because you've been on Wikipedia long enough and you should know the rules by now. I am also entitled to give you a warning regarding your continuous violations of WP:CIVIL, but I'd better leave this to other uninvolved editors instead. Fitzcarmalan ( talk) 09:43, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Please stop
pinging me. I am tired of getting notifications from you all the time, and when I take a look, there is nothing but crap thrown against me. I've
politely asked one of the IPs to stop using the talk page as a forum. He then thanked me through another IP but continued the disruption with it. A third IP came up and this time
I asked him/her to create their own account in order to avoid having others accusing me of sockpuppetry. I am not playing admin and I have nothing to explain to you. By the way, the IP didn't go off topic as much as you did, and even if, I will have to remove hide many other comments, including yours. But I can't because this is an important discussion and because only parts of your entries and the IP's entries are irrelevant to the discussion.
Fitzcarmalan (
talk)
09:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Never mind, Usaeedi, I don't accept awards and medals, not by you, nore by anyone else. Anyway they just make vain and lazy. And finally I did not deserve it at all, because I am not neutral at all, but completely biased - in aid of science, work, and honesty. Take care! -- Anglo-Araneophilus ( talk) 17:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Okay no problem. Please continue your contribution. -- Usaeedi ( talk) 07:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The 1001: A Nature Trust may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:33, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The 1001: A Nature Trust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip Morris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:40, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello Anglo-Araneophilus and thank you for the work in Wikipedia. I just saw you have no e-mail selected. Just a tip: You could choose one at the preferences. Your e-mail will not be visible to any other users, but people could write to you with it in case it shall not be public and you would have a additional safety for the account (you could reset the password with it). -- Larsenat ( talk) 21:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Anglo-Araneophilus. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
22:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) ( talk)
10:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Kunnst am User:Al-Andalusi amol derzähln, das i koin bleda Kerl bin? Der Arme is beim hiesigen Taharrush gamea ganz schee gega die Wand gfohrn. Mir reichts au mittlerweil. User:Al-Andalusi, I was not aware of the ongoing AN3 process and not overly impressed by your choice of words at the Taharrush gamea disksite. So the short block was appropriate. But I understand some of your points in the meanwhile. Anglo-Araneophilus is aware of my work on the German version and we had some valuable discussions overthere. See Talk:New_Year's_Eve_sexual_assaults_in_Germany#Requested_move_22_January_2016 for that experience. Polentarion Talk 04:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
At this point I would like to warn you that you have conducted 3 reverts of my edits. I myself have just made a third revert and will not do any more at the moment. However, I am obligated to warn you that conducting more than three reverts is a violation of the 3RR rule that can result in a block. EkoGraf ( talk) 23:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. EkoGraf ( talk) 00:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey there! I am a new contributor in Wikipedia, started this week and I love the culture and personal efforts done by millions from around the world, and I decided to be one of them. I have noticed how much effort you done in Saudi_Arabian-led_intervention_in_Yemen and I am very grateful. But there is a problem,only two types of sources are used, Pro-Saudi, and not aligned sources, I have a suggestion since you are one of the big page contributors in this link here : Sources Can you please leave a comment there? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YemArabSf ( talk • contribs) 15:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 19:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
@ Diannaa: I prepared a modification of the chapter "Calls for international independent investigations" yet. If you agree I can post it here on my talk page for you to check if it meets your idea of work in compliance with WP rules. Maybe this is the best way to avoid a third warning of yours. If you find the content not in compliance with copyright standards, you can delete it here on my talk page, so no reader will have contact with it. Maybe just tell me whether I shall post it here or not. In oder to continue my work on the article and by that time avoiding to get blocked I have to understand whether I understood you right. This could be a way to ckeck it out. What do you think about it? Greetings,-- Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki ( talk) 20:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
MSF medical activities in Yemen have come under attack four times in less than three months, each incident more serious than the last. The first took place on 26 October, when fighter jets from the Saudi-led coalition repeatedly bombed a hospital in Haydan district, Saada Province. An MSF mobile clinic was then hit by an airstrike on 2 December in Taiz’s Al Houban district, wounding eight people including two MSF staff and killing one person nearby. MSF has yet to receive any official explanation for any of these incidents. “Increasingly, we are seeing attacks on medical facilities being minimised, being labelled ‘mistakes’ or ‘errors’,” says Ayora. “Just last week the UK Foreign Secretary claimed that there have been no deliberate breaches of international humanitarian law in Yemen by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This implies that mistakenly bombing a protected hospital would be tolerable. This logic is offensive and irresponsible.”
In less than three months Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) medical activities in Yemen came under attack four times. The first took place on 26 October, 2015, when fighter jets from the Saudi-led coalition repeatedly - HRW documented six Saudi-led airstrikes - bombed a MSF hospital in Haydan district (Sa'dah Governorate), wounding two patients. An Saudi-led coalition airstrike then hit a MSF mobile clinic on December 2, 2015, in Al Houban district (Taizz), wounding eight people, including two MSF staff members, and killing one other civilian nearby. MSF said on January 25 that it had not received any official explanation for any of these incidents. Raquel Ayora, MSF Director of Operations, said, that attacks on medical facilities were Increasingly being minimised, being labelled ‘mistakes’ or ‘errors’. She criticised, that the UK Foreign Secretary claimed that there had been no deliberate breaches of international humanitarian law in Yemen by Saudi Arabia and said: "This implies that mistakenly bombing a protected hospital would be tolerable. This logic is offensive and irresponsible."
As already announced I prepared a response to your previous post ( diff). Here it is:
Thanks for your quick response again. Thanks also for citing the source of procedure or algorhitm you were using to identify "copyright violations" as you did above in your markings ( diff). This might be the key and reason for some serious misunderstandings between us. I already noticed before that you possibly were using a non-specific algorhitm mechanically with only limited manual cross-checking of its plausibility and adequacy. Only this could explain, why you were marking names, indirect speech, time data and similar copyright non-critical information. Examing your results it seems for me we have both to learn:
I'll try to show you what keeps left from your "copyright violation" claims with regard to my edit ( diff) you were referring to ( diff) for your second warning, when it is manually counterchecked:
MSF medical activities in Yemen have come under attack four times in less than three months, each incident more serious than the last. The first took place on 26 October, when fighter jets from the Saudi-led coalition repeatedly bombed a hospital in Haydan district, Saada Province. An MSF mobile clinic was then hit by an airstrike on 2 December in Taiz’s Al Houban district, wounding eight people including two MSF staff and killing one person nearby. MSF has yet to receive any official explanation for any of these incidents. “Increasingly, we are seeing attacks on medical facilities being minimised, being labelled ‘mistakes’ or ‘errors’,” says Ayora. “Just last week the UK Foreign Secretary claimed that there have been no deliberate breaches of international humanitarian law in Yemen by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This implies that mistakenly bombing a protected hospital would be tolerable. This logic is offensive and irresponsible.”
In less than three months Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) medical activities in Yemen came under attack four times. The first took place on 26 October, 2015, when fighter jets from the Saudi-led coalition repeatedly - HRW documented six Saudi-led airstrikes - bombed a MSF hospital in Haydan district (Sa'dah Governorate), wounding two patients. An Saudi-led coalition airstrike then hit a MSF mobile clinic on December 2, 2015, in Al Houban district (Taizz), wounding eight people, including two MSF staff members, and killing one other civilian nearby. MSF said on January 25 that it had not received any official explanation for any of these incidents. Raquel Ayora, MSF Director of Operations, said, that attacks on medical facilities were Increasingly being minimised, being labelled ‘mistakes’ or ‘errors’. She criticised, that the UK Foreign Secretary claimed that there had been no deliberate breaches of international humanitarian law in Yemen by Saudi Arabia and said: "This implies that mistakenly bombing a protected hospital would be tolerable. This logic is offensive and irresponsible."
Most of the content highlighted by you was indirect speech of quotations only. Much of the rest is trivial expressions. Some few like "medical activities", "The first took place", "when fighter jets from the Saudi-led coalition repeatedly" probably should have been re-worded before posting them. But altogether it seems to be a quite inadequately opinion to call this "copyright violation". I'd like to hear your response to this. Greetings,-- Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki ( talk) 08:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
This version of your Draft sandbox has an overlap of over 92% with the source webpage. Your editing reduced the overlap down to 49%, which is still unacceptable. It may not be obvious, so I will say it to you plainly: adding copyright material to any Wikipedia page, including sandboxes and talk pages, is unacceptable. Any content added here has to already be re-written so that it complies with copyright law. — Diannaa ( talk) 22:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Folgende Arbeitsfassung erscheint in deutscher Sprache, da ich in dieser Sprache am schnellsten und am präzisesten in der Lage bin, eine Analyse durchzuführen.
Es handelt sich im Kern um eine Auflistung der getätigten Artikelbearbeitungen (Textmodifikationen und Textentfernungen) von User:Diannaa, die mit der Begründung, copyright content zu behandeln, durchgeführt wurden. Die Auflistung dient der Untersuchung und Analyse dieser Bearbeitungen. Es ist zu prüfen, ob und wenn, in wieweit, diese Bearbeitungen tatsächlich "copyright content" behandelt haben und ob und wenn, welcher Art andere Bearbeitungen zugrundeliegen. Spätestens ab dem 25. Februar 2016 wurde zeitnah (umgehend) die Artikelversionsgeschichte zu diesen Bearbeitungen entfernt (Stand: 25. Februar 2016: rückwirkend bis "16:12, 10 May 2015", also dem Beginn meiner umfassenden Überarbeitung des Artikels). Durch die Löschung der Versionsgeschichte kann für Benutzer ohne entsprechende Administratorrechte nur noch der Umfang in Speicherplatzverbrauch (und anhand der Versionskommentare) ermessen werden, während die Qualität der Berbeitungen (Artikelinhalt im Wortlaut und in fachlicher Qualität samt Quellennachweisen) nicht mehr einsehbar sind. Damit ist gleichzeitig Benutzern ohne entsprechende Administratorrechte nicht mehr möglich, mögliche Falschangaben und Regelverstösse von User:Diannaa einzusehen. Die Fortführung dieser Arbeitsfassung erfüllt dennoch ihren Sinn, da mir ein ursprünglicher Artikeltext weiterhin vorliegt und so einen (mit dem Vorbehalt, auf eine bestimmte Artikelversion als Vergleichswert begrenzt zu sein) Abgleich der Ursprungstexte mit der Bearbeitung von User:Diannaa erlaubt. Dass durch die Entfernung der Artikelhistorie (z.B. nach RD1 unter Einsatz des Kriteriums "Blatant copyright violations") ein erheblicher Copyrights- und Regelverstoss vorliegen kann, der nun die umfangreiche Artikelbearbeitung als Werk von User:Diannaa erscheinen lässt, ist ein weiterer Aspekt, der insbesondere dann zum Tragen kommt, wenn eine fehlende Stichhaltigkeit der Copyrightverletzung-Vorwürfe von User:Diannaa gegen meinen Account besteht.
Hey, may I ask which tool do you use to auto cite + archive the page and then post it in a ref tag?
I am using those tools at the moment which only supports auto cite:
YemArabSf ( talk) 21:35, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Selam , Türk karşıtı kullanıcı Khoikhoi ingilizce wikipedia'da adminlik için şansını deniyor.Daha fazla türk gelirse bunu engelleyebiliriz. Oyunu burdan kullanabilirsin Teşekkürler. ( 85.97.143.5 18:02, 26 March 2006 (UTC))
Hallo Araneophilus! Ich befürchte, ich kann Deine Frage nicht befriedigend beantworten, weil ich mich weniger um die arabische Schrift und Sprache kümmere, als um inhaltliche Dinge, was vor allem den Themenbereich Sufismus betrifft. Soviel aber kann ich Dir mitteilen: Es existiert in der deutschen Wikipedia die Seite Wikipedia:Namenskonventionen/Arabisch. Oder lies mal im Artikel Arabische Schrift oder klicke Dich von dort aus durch. Außerdem meine ich, daß Dir evtl. Benutzer:Orientalist weiterhelfen könnte. Wenn nicht, dann kann vielleicht auch er Dich "weiterreichen". Viele Grüße, Mounir (deutsche WP) | Mounir (englische WP) 20:29, 22 September 2005 (UTC)
P.S.: Du gibst auf Deiner deutschen und englischen Benutzseite Dein Englischniveau mit 2 an, aber hier auf Anglo-Araneophilus mit 1. Ich denke, es handelt sich da nur um einen Tippfehler, oder?
Hallo! Zu Deiner Frage: "Wie kann man denn seine Tilden (mit dem Erfolg von Account- und Datumsangabe) mit einem englischen Account in der deutschen WP setzen?" - Also: Ich kann es auch nicht, auch wenn es im ersten Moment so ausschaut. Ich hatte Dir ja auf dieser englischen Diskussionsseite eine Antwort geschrieben, also sind Datum etc. aus der englischen Wikipedia. Da ich aber immer meine Antworten noch einmal auf meiner eigenen Diskussionsseite direkt zu der dazugehörenden Frage einfüge, damit dort die "Unterhaltung" auch als solche gelesen werden kann, wurde eben in diesem Fall das UTC-Datum mit rüberkopiert. Ganz einfach, hatte ich auch gar nicht so geplant... Und den Link zur eigenen Benutzerseite hatte ich manuell eingetippt. Wenn Du jetzt und hier auf "Seite bearbeiten" klickst, dann kannst Du sehen, was man da eingeben muß. Aber das weißt Du eigentlich eh schon, weil Du soviel ich meine, Deine englische Unterschrift auch schon in meine deutsche Diskussion gesetzt hast. Grüße, -- Mounir 08:22, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
Danke für den Tipp, ich habe den Link hinzugefügt. Da ich sowieso Deutscher bin, kannst du mir also ruhig in deutsch auch schreiben ;-) Aus deinem Benutzernamen entnehme ich, daß du Spinnenliebhaber bist, ich habe u.a. ein paar Fotos Kappadokischer Spinnen auf meiner Insektenseite, wenn du Lust hast, schau mal rein...-- ✉ katpatuka →
Seltsamer_Edit - Hallo tickle! Danke für Aufklärung, Link und deine sorgfältige Arbeit am Thema.: Ich habe seit einiger Zeit Probleme mit einigen usern wegen meiner Teilnahme an Diskus bzw. Edits zu Völkermord an den Armeniern oder islambezogenen Themen. Mein Fehler hier hat desw. ziemlich gehässige Reaktionen auf meiner Disku zu Folge (Ich versteh nur noch Bahnhof. Bei türkischen Begriffen entfernst du die Sonderzeichen...). In dieser Hinsicht wäre es nett, wenn du deinen berechtigten Dank an PJacoby um obige Bemerkung ergänzen könntest, es ist sonst IMO etwas mißverständlich. -- tickle me 07:01, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
Dein Bemühen um den Artikel "Yörük" zeigt, dass es sich lohnt, meine Fassung genau anzusehen. Dabei, denke ich, bist du mit deinen Änderungen etwas über das Ziel hinausgeschossen. So meine ich, dass keine Verweise auf die Literatur im Text sein sollten. Es ist in Enzyklopädieartikeln entgegen wissenschaftlichen Essays nicht üblich. Zudem halte ich es nicht für angebracht, z. B. bei Kunze die einzelnen Aufsätze anzuführen. Die Literaturangaben sollen einen ersten Einstieg ermöglichen, nicht mehr! Manche Textteile, die du versucht hast zu präzisieren, waren von mir bewusst in der Schwebe gehalten. Dadurch konnte manchmal mehr ausgesagt werden als mit z. B. zeitlich eingeschränkten Angaben. Den Völkermord an den Armeniern sollte man in diesem Artikel nicht erwähnen. Er hat hier keine Relevanz und provoziert nur einen zu erwartenden Edit-war.
Beste Grüße --
84.149.218.254 (Wetwassermann)
06:55, 7 December 2005 (UTC)
Post your suggestions of changes for the Ottoman Armenian casulties. Thanks Fad (ix) 16:31, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Hallo Anglo-Araneophilus, ich glaube Du wolltest mehr Info zu Souchons Dienstgrad haben. Souchon war Konteradmiral, als er die Goeben und Breslau nach Konstantinopel brachte. Ansomsten kann ich nur noch hinzufügen, dass er am 29. Oktober 1916 den "Pour le Merite" erhielt und zu diesem Zeitpunkt meines Wissens Vizeadmiral war. Ob er danach eine weitere Beförderung zum Admiral erhielt, entzieht sich meiner Kenntnis. Cosal 12:22, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Auf der deutschen WP stört sich mal wieder jemand (Decius) an deinem Asker-Artikel. Schau mal bei Gelegenheit rein, ich weiss nicht, ob ich es alleine schaffe, ihn zu beruhigen. -- Mustafa Mustamann 19:24, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
Ich habe gerade diese Nachricht auf ihren deutschen Diskussionsseiten hinterlassen !
ich würde ihnen gern eine email schicken aber das geht leider nicht mehr, - vielleicht sind Sie ja so nett mir [ http://www.ifgg.uni-karlsruhe.de/index.php.cgi/ger/personen/akad_mitarbeiter_innen/dr_christophe_neff ] dort eine Nachricht zu hinterlassen. Ich habe gerade so mitbekommen, was da alles geschehen ist, und ich bin wirklich perplex ! viele herzliche Grüße Christophe Neff 22:33, 7. Jun. 2008 (CEST) Vielleicht sind Sie ja so nett und geben mir ein feed-back ! herzliche grüße Christophe Neff ( talk) 20:38, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
WhiteWriter speaks 11:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
I added infobox. If you can add some more data, or solve name chaos, that would be quite useful. What do you think, what should be do with the name? It looks like Ibar bridge is quite common also... -- WhiteWriter speaks 17:55, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Images from 17th-18th March 2004. Just as info, and confirmation that it was there. -- WhiteWriter speaks 20:25, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
WhiteWriter speaks 21:00, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Hi, I added the missing data. Thank you. ( Mazidan ( talk) 11:25, 23 August 2013 (UTC))
Please stop using talk pages such as Talk:August 2013 Rabaa Massacre for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. This is a level-2 warning/notification because you've been on Wikipedia long enough and you should know the rules by now. I am also entitled to give you a warning regarding your continuous violations of WP:CIVIL, but I'd better leave this to other uninvolved editors instead. Fitzcarmalan ( talk) 09:43, 10 July 2014 (UTC)
Please stop
pinging me. I am tired of getting notifications from you all the time, and when I take a look, there is nothing but crap thrown against me. I've
politely asked one of the IPs to stop using the talk page as a forum. He then thanked me through another IP but continued the disruption with it. A third IP came up and this time
I asked him/her to create their own account in order to avoid having others accusing me of sockpuppetry. I am not playing admin and I have nothing to explain to you. By the way, the IP didn't go off topic as much as you did, and even if, I will have to remove hide many other comments, including yours. But I can't because this is an important discussion and because only parts of your entries and the IP's entries are irrelevant to the discussion.
Fitzcarmalan (
talk)
09:09, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Never mind, Usaeedi, I don't accept awards and medals, not by you, nore by anyone else. Anyway they just make vain and lazy. And finally I did not deserve it at all, because I am not neutral at all, but completely biased - in aid of science, work, and honesty. Take care! -- Anglo-Araneophilus ( talk) 17:32, 15 July 2014 (UTC)
Okay no problem. Please continue your contribution. -- Usaeedi ( talk) 07:51, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The 1001: A Nature Trust may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 00:33, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The 1001: A Nature Trust, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Philip Morris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 09:40, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
Hello Anglo-Araneophilus and thank you for the work in Wikipedia. I just saw you have no e-mail selected. Just a tip: You could choose one at the preferences. Your e-mail will not be visible to any other users, but people could write to you with it in case it shall not be public and you would have a additional safety for the account (you could reset the password with it). -- Larsenat ( talk) 21:28, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
Hello,
The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.
Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called Anglo-Araneophilus. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name. If you think you might own all of the accounts with this name and this message is in error, please visit Special:MergeAccount to check and attach all of your accounts to prevent them from being renamed.
Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.
Sorry for the inconvenience.
Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation
22:02, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
This account has been renamed as part of single-user login finalisation. If you own this account you can log in using your previous username and password for more information. If you do not like this account's new name, you can choose your own using this form after logging in: Special:GlobalRenameRequest. -- Keegan (WMF) ( talk)
10:30, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Kunnst am User:Al-Andalusi amol derzähln, das i koin bleda Kerl bin? Der Arme is beim hiesigen Taharrush gamea ganz schee gega die Wand gfohrn. Mir reichts au mittlerweil. User:Al-Andalusi, I was not aware of the ongoing AN3 process and not overly impressed by your choice of words at the Taharrush gamea disksite. So the short block was appropriate. But I understand some of your points in the meanwhile. Anglo-Araneophilus is aware of my work on the German version and we had some valuable discussions overthere. See Talk:New_Year's_Eve_sexual_assaults_in_Germany#Requested_move_22_January_2016 for that experience. Polentarion Talk 04:35, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
At this point I would like to warn you that you have conducted 3 reverts of my edits. I myself have just made a third revert and will not do any more at the moment. However, I am obligated to warn you that conducting more than three reverts is a violation of the 3RR rule that can result in a block. EkoGraf ( talk) 23:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. EkoGraf ( talk) 00:43, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey there! I am a new contributor in Wikipedia, started this week and I love the culture and personal efforts done by millions from around the world, and I decided to be one of them. I have noticed how much effort you done in Saudi_Arabian-led_intervention_in_Yemen and I am very grateful. But there is a problem,only two types of sources are used, Pro-Saudi, and not aligned sources, I have a suggestion since you are one of the big page contributors in this link here : Sources Can you please leave a comment there? Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YemArabSf ( talk • contribs) 15:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to Saudi Arabian-led intervention in Yemen has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa ( talk) 19:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)
@ Diannaa: I prepared a modification of the chapter "Calls for international independent investigations" yet. If you agree I can post it here on my talk page for you to check if it meets your idea of work in compliance with WP rules. Maybe this is the best way to avoid a third warning of yours. If you find the content not in compliance with copyright standards, you can delete it here on my talk page, so no reader will have contact with it. Maybe just tell me whether I shall post it here or not. In oder to continue my work on the article and by that time avoiding to get blocked I have to understand whether I understood you right. This could be a way to ckeck it out. What do you think about it? Greetings,-- Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki ( talk) 20:38, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
MSF medical activities in Yemen have come under attack four times in less than three months, each incident more serious than the last. The first took place on 26 October, when fighter jets from the Saudi-led coalition repeatedly bombed a hospital in Haydan district, Saada Province. An MSF mobile clinic was then hit by an airstrike on 2 December in Taiz’s Al Houban district, wounding eight people including two MSF staff and killing one person nearby. MSF has yet to receive any official explanation for any of these incidents. “Increasingly, we are seeing attacks on medical facilities being minimised, being labelled ‘mistakes’ or ‘errors’,” says Ayora. “Just last week the UK Foreign Secretary claimed that there have been no deliberate breaches of international humanitarian law in Yemen by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This implies that mistakenly bombing a protected hospital would be tolerable. This logic is offensive and irresponsible.”
In less than three months Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) medical activities in Yemen came under attack four times. The first took place on 26 October, 2015, when fighter jets from the Saudi-led coalition repeatedly - HRW documented six Saudi-led airstrikes - bombed a MSF hospital in Haydan district (Sa'dah Governorate), wounding two patients. An Saudi-led coalition airstrike then hit a MSF mobile clinic on December 2, 2015, in Al Houban district (Taizz), wounding eight people, including two MSF staff members, and killing one other civilian nearby. MSF said on January 25 that it had not received any official explanation for any of these incidents. Raquel Ayora, MSF Director of Operations, said, that attacks on medical facilities were Increasingly being minimised, being labelled ‘mistakes’ or ‘errors’. She criticised, that the UK Foreign Secretary claimed that there had been no deliberate breaches of international humanitarian law in Yemen by Saudi Arabia and said: "This implies that mistakenly bombing a protected hospital would be tolerable. This logic is offensive and irresponsible."
As already announced I prepared a response to your previous post ( diff). Here it is:
Thanks for your quick response again. Thanks also for citing the source of procedure or algorhitm you were using to identify "copyright violations" as you did above in your markings ( diff). This might be the key and reason for some serious misunderstandings between us. I already noticed before that you possibly were using a non-specific algorhitm mechanically with only limited manual cross-checking of its plausibility and adequacy. Only this could explain, why you were marking names, indirect speech, time data and similar copyright non-critical information. Examing your results it seems for me we have both to learn:
I'll try to show you what keeps left from your "copyright violation" claims with regard to my edit ( diff) you were referring to ( diff) for your second warning, when it is manually counterchecked:
MSF medical activities in Yemen have come under attack four times in less than three months, each incident more serious than the last. The first took place on 26 October, when fighter jets from the Saudi-led coalition repeatedly bombed a hospital in Haydan district, Saada Province. An MSF mobile clinic was then hit by an airstrike on 2 December in Taiz’s Al Houban district, wounding eight people including two MSF staff and killing one person nearby. MSF has yet to receive any official explanation for any of these incidents. “Increasingly, we are seeing attacks on medical facilities being minimised, being labelled ‘mistakes’ or ‘errors’,” says Ayora. “Just last week the UK Foreign Secretary claimed that there have been no deliberate breaches of international humanitarian law in Yemen by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. This implies that mistakenly bombing a protected hospital would be tolerable. This logic is offensive and irresponsible.”
In less than three months Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) medical activities in Yemen came under attack four times. The first took place on 26 October, 2015, when fighter jets from the Saudi-led coalition repeatedly - HRW documented six Saudi-led airstrikes - bombed a MSF hospital in Haydan district (Sa'dah Governorate), wounding two patients. An Saudi-led coalition airstrike then hit a MSF mobile clinic on December 2, 2015, in Al Houban district (Taizz), wounding eight people, including two MSF staff members, and killing one other civilian nearby. MSF said on January 25 that it had not received any official explanation for any of these incidents. Raquel Ayora, MSF Director of Operations, said, that attacks on medical facilities were Increasingly being minimised, being labelled ‘mistakes’ or ‘errors’. She criticised, that the UK Foreign Secretary claimed that there had been no deliberate breaches of international humanitarian law in Yemen by Saudi Arabia and said: "This implies that mistakenly bombing a protected hospital would be tolerable. This logic is offensive and irresponsible."
Most of the content highlighted by you was indirect speech of quotations only. Much of the rest is trivial expressions. Some few like "medical activities", "The first took place", "when fighter jets from the Saudi-led coalition repeatedly" probably should have been re-worded before posting them. But altogether it seems to be a quite inadequately opinion to call this "copyright violation". I'd like to hear your response to this. Greetings,-- Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki ( talk) 08:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
This version of your Draft sandbox has an overlap of over 92% with the source webpage. Your editing reduced the overlap down to 49%, which is still unacceptable. It may not be obvious, so I will say it to you plainly: adding copyright material to any Wikipedia page, including sandboxes and talk pages, is unacceptable. Any content added here has to already be re-written so that it complies with copyright law. — Diannaa ( talk) 22:33, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Folgende Arbeitsfassung erscheint in deutscher Sprache, da ich in dieser Sprache am schnellsten und am präzisesten in der Lage bin, eine Analyse durchzuführen.
Es handelt sich im Kern um eine Auflistung der getätigten Artikelbearbeitungen (Textmodifikationen und Textentfernungen) von User:Diannaa, die mit der Begründung, copyright content zu behandeln, durchgeführt wurden. Die Auflistung dient der Untersuchung und Analyse dieser Bearbeitungen. Es ist zu prüfen, ob und wenn, in wieweit, diese Bearbeitungen tatsächlich "copyright content" behandelt haben und ob und wenn, welcher Art andere Bearbeitungen zugrundeliegen. Spätestens ab dem 25. Februar 2016 wurde zeitnah (umgehend) die Artikelversionsgeschichte zu diesen Bearbeitungen entfernt (Stand: 25. Februar 2016: rückwirkend bis "16:12, 10 May 2015", also dem Beginn meiner umfassenden Überarbeitung des Artikels). Durch die Löschung der Versionsgeschichte kann für Benutzer ohne entsprechende Administratorrechte nur noch der Umfang in Speicherplatzverbrauch (und anhand der Versionskommentare) ermessen werden, während die Qualität der Berbeitungen (Artikelinhalt im Wortlaut und in fachlicher Qualität samt Quellennachweisen) nicht mehr einsehbar sind. Damit ist gleichzeitig Benutzern ohne entsprechende Administratorrechte nicht mehr möglich, mögliche Falschangaben und Regelverstösse von User:Diannaa einzusehen. Die Fortführung dieser Arbeitsfassung erfüllt dennoch ihren Sinn, da mir ein ursprünglicher Artikeltext weiterhin vorliegt und so einen (mit dem Vorbehalt, auf eine bestimmte Artikelversion als Vergleichswert begrenzt zu sein) Abgleich der Ursprungstexte mit der Bearbeitung von User:Diannaa erlaubt. Dass durch die Entfernung der Artikelhistorie (z.B. nach RD1 unter Einsatz des Kriteriums "Blatant copyright violations") ein erheblicher Copyrights- und Regelverstoss vorliegen kann, der nun die umfangreiche Artikelbearbeitung als Werk von User:Diannaa erscheinen lässt, ist ein weiterer Aspekt, der insbesondere dann zum Tragen kommt, wenn eine fehlende Stichhaltigkeit der Copyrightverletzung-Vorwürfe von User:Diannaa gegen meinen Account besteht.
Hey, may I ask which tool do you use to auto cite + archive the page and then post it in a ref tag?
I am using those tools at the moment which only supports auto cite:
YemArabSf ( talk) 21:35, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Anglo-Araneophilus~enwiki. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)