I generally discourage use of subpages of my user talk page, but there are exceptions, and this is currently one of them. Comments very welcome. Andrewa ( talk)

Is any of this useful? Should it be moved to project namespace if so? Under what name... historical consensus is the obvious one, but we'd need redirects from community consensus and local consensus for it not to become a forgotten back water, and these would I feel be controversial. That's why I like the current name instead. A redirect from historical consensus would be appropriate.

Or, should some of the better bits simply be copied into current project pages?

Interested in all comments. Andrewa ( talk) 06:40, 18 August 2013 (UTC) reply

That was when the name was Types of consensus. I've now gone to Consensus is consensus, for several reasons. It's the first name I'm really happy with, but we'll see if it grows on me (or off). Andrewa ( talk) 17:15, 8 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Incorporating an excellent comment [1]. Andrewa ( talk) 01:21, 23 August 2013 (UTC) reply

• Thoughts..., a gut reaction.... A qualified consensus is a false consensus. That's "false consensus" as in false-consensus effect. -- SmokeyJoe ( talk) 12:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Fascinating and relevant link! Thank you. Andrewa ( talk) 17:12, 8 March 2014 (UTC) reply