![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with Anderson. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive1 |
All Pages: | 2 - ... (up to 100) |
Hello, Anderson9990, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Sarah (
talk) 13:53, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 21:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Dan653 ( talk) 23:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi there Anderson, I've been assigned your instructor at the Coutner Vandalism Unit Academy. I see that you already have rollback rights, which means that you have an understanding of anti-vandalism, and understand that you would like more support in using Twinkle. Is that right? Firstly, have you enabled Twinkle yet? ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 11:01, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I've undone your good-faith reversion of the article Dejan Lovren, because you inadvertently replaced a correct version with a vandalised version. Cyril Washbrook ( talk) 15:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
That edit to WWE NXT was not vandalism. I was removing a useless template because Season 6 is not a competition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.60.84.9 ( talk) 21:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
No whoever said it is a competition needs a source. It is an all new NXT and they have made no mention about a competition on Season 6. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and use your common sense WP:COMMON Socks 01 21:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello Anderson9990, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kaan tasaner, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: An actor being in a leading role is a credible assertion of importance. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 21:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Sp:AL, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a
mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion (
{{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit
the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
DASHBot (
talk) 00:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thanks for your contributions! SwisterTwister talk 04:17, 23 June 2012 (UTC) |
Hi there, Anderson. As your Counter Vandalism Unit Academy instructor, I have created you an academy page at User:ItsZippy/CVUA/Anderson9990. Please read what is written there; the first section of your course, with a task to complete, is written there. ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 15:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
do you even watch it. it isn't. check wwe.com too. it used to be until half way through season 5. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.60.84.9 ( talk) 05:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
You need to provide a source that it is not a competition.-- Anderson9990 ( talk) 21:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
This is like saying Raw or SmackDown is a competition and adding Superstar win loss records and poll results to the articles. Nonsense.
Season 6 is a new show with no competition mentioned at all. It features undercard performers and FCW athletes. Read other websites and the WWE NXT wikipedia article even states it. Socks 01 21:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
List_of_WWE_personnel#WWE_NXT. Quite a lot on the roster don't you think. NXT doesn't use the 8 or 6 rookie format anymore. It is now a show where upcomming superstars showcase there talent at full sail university.
I don't know who you are, or upon what basis you are authorized to delete entries without yourself doing even the most rudimentary work to determine whether the entries you delete are or are not verifiable.
You deleted the entirety of my entry concerning Judge Robert E. Blackburn on the basis that it contains "possibly controversial statements". It would seem to me more apporpriate that you delete only those portions you presumptuously deem controversial, rather than an entire entry, and notify the author of those requiring further substantiation.
Most of the entry was a simple recitation of undeniable, uncontroversial facts.
Most or all were reported in the "Westword" article cited.
I have personal knowledge of all of them.
Would you please bother to identify those portions you deem "controversial"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mebcaux ( talk • contribs) 14:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
The Information may not be Controversial, But it is possibly poorly Referenced.-- Anderson9990 ( talk) 21:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
I noticed your one says 2¢, so haw do you change that?-- Anderson9990 ( talk) 01:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Anderson. Thank you and well done for completing your last task; there's now more for you to do at your academy page. ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 12:27, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
If you could please moderate. One person claims a quote was taken out of context. I think I made an accurate edit in his bio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.100.67.59 ( talk) 22:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
I understand that. but you have violated the Three-revert rule-- Anderson9990 - Talk to me - False Positive? Report it! 23:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
I actually only reverted twice after creating that new section. I still want to add a note of the two articles I brought up in the talk page. How should I proceed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.95.87.180 ( talk) 19:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
This is not vandalism. I'm removing a section which is unimportant, the Popular culture section don't you understand? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.52.46.44 ( talk) 00:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
You have not provided a reason for the removal of content, so it will be indentified as vandalism.-- Anderson9990 - Talk to me - False Positive? Report it! 00:31, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
You have now Violated the 3 Revert Rule.-- Anderson9990 - Talk to me - False Positive? Report it! 00:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your responses at your academy page. I've taken a look and given you a few more tasks to do (there's three this time, which might take a little more time). Hope you're ok and getting on well - do let me know if you have any problems. ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 17:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks again for your responses. I've given you new tasks to complete (sorry for taking a little while). I think we're nearly there now: once you've got through all of the lessons and tasks, I will give you 5 days in which I will monitor your progress and be around to answer questions. After that, I will set you a graduation test. If there are no major issues during the monitoring phase, and you do well on the test, you will graduate from the programme. At this point, if there is anything else you would like to be covered that has not, please let me know (there will be a brief section on page protection and speedy deletion after the current one). ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 17:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings,
Regarding the "Peter Greenaway" section of the "List of film director and cinematographer collaborations", I added some entries about that director's collaborations with Reinier van Brummelen, the reliability of which is easy to verify. Yet you reverted them (as well as some other minor updates). I would like to know the reasons why. Thanks in advance !
Best regards,
171.16.208.3 ( talk) 10:00, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions with Anderson. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive1 |
All Pages: | 2 - ... (up to 100) |
Hello, Anderson9990, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Sarah (
talk) 13:53, 16 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
Electriccatfish2 ( talk) 21:28, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Dan653 ( talk) 23:50, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi there Anderson, I've been assigned your instructor at the Coutner Vandalism Unit Academy. I see that you already have rollback rights, which means that you have an understanding of anti-vandalism, and understand that you would like more support in using Twinkle. Is that right? Firstly, have you enabled Twinkle yet? ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 11:01, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I've undone your good-faith reversion of the article Dejan Lovren, because you inadvertently replaced a correct version with a vandalised version. Cyril Washbrook ( talk) 15:57, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
That edit to WWE NXT was not vandalism. I was removing a useless template because Season 6 is not a competition. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.60.84.9 ( talk) 21:55, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
No whoever said it is a competition needs a source. It is an all new NXT and they have made no mention about a competition on Season 6. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball and use your common sense WP:COMMON Socks 01 21:42, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello Anderson9990, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kaan tasaner, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: An actor being in a leading role is a credible assertion of importance. You may wish to review the Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Ϣere SpielChequers 21:58, 22 June 2012 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Sp:AL, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to an article talk page, file description page, file talk page, MediaWiki page, MediaWiki talk page, category talk page, portal talk page, template talk page, help talk, user page, user talk or special page from the main/article space.
If you can fix the redirect to point to a
mainspace page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion (
{{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit
the article's talk page directly to give your reasons. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
DASHBot (
talk) 00:11, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar |
Thanks for your contributions! SwisterTwister talk 04:17, 23 June 2012 (UTC) |
Hi there, Anderson. As your Counter Vandalism Unit Academy instructor, I have created you an academy page at User:ItsZippy/CVUA/Anderson9990. Please read what is written there; the first section of your course, with a task to complete, is written there. ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 15:15, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
do you even watch it. it isn't. check wwe.com too. it used to be until half way through season 5. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.60.84.9 ( talk) 05:03, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
You need to provide a source that it is not a competition.-- Anderson9990 ( talk) 21:27, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
This is like saying Raw or SmackDown is a competition and adding Superstar win loss records and poll results to the articles. Nonsense.
Season 6 is a new show with no competition mentioned at all. It features undercard performers and FCW athletes. Read other websites and the WWE NXT wikipedia article even states it. Socks 01 21:47, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
List_of_WWE_personnel#WWE_NXT. Quite a lot on the roster don't you think. NXT doesn't use the 8 or 6 rookie format anymore. It is now a show where upcomming superstars showcase there talent at full sail university.
I don't know who you are, or upon what basis you are authorized to delete entries without yourself doing even the most rudimentary work to determine whether the entries you delete are or are not verifiable.
You deleted the entirety of my entry concerning Judge Robert E. Blackburn on the basis that it contains "possibly controversial statements". It would seem to me more apporpriate that you delete only those portions you presumptuously deem controversial, rather than an entire entry, and notify the author of those requiring further substantiation.
Most of the entry was a simple recitation of undeniable, uncontroversial facts.
Most or all were reported in the "Westword" article cited.
I have personal knowledge of all of them.
Would you please bother to identify those portions you deem "controversial"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mebcaux ( talk • contribs) 14:23, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
The Information may not be Controversial, But it is possibly poorly Referenced.-- Anderson9990 ( talk) 21:29, 25 June 2012 (UTC)
I noticed your one says 2¢, so haw do you change that?-- Anderson9990 ( talk) 01:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
Hi Anderson. Thank you and well done for completing your last task; there's now more for you to do at your academy page. ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 12:27, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
If you could please moderate. One person claims a quote was taken out of context. I think I made an accurate edit in his bio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 50.100.67.59 ( talk) 22:52, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
I understand that. but you have violated the Three-revert rule-- Anderson9990 - Talk to me - False Positive? Report it! 23:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)
I actually only reverted twice after creating that new section. I still want to add a note of the two articles I brought up in the talk page. How should I proceed? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 174.95.87.180 ( talk) 19:49, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
This is not vandalism. I'm removing a section which is unimportant, the Popular culture section don't you understand? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.52.46.44 ( talk) 00:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
You have not provided a reason for the removal of content, so it will be indentified as vandalism.-- Anderson9990 - Talk to me - False Positive? Report it! 00:31, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
You have now Violated the 3 Revert Rule.-- Anderson9990 - Talk to me - False Positive? Report it! 00:49, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your responses at your academy page. I've taken a look and given you a few more tasks to do (there's three this time, which might take a little more time). Hope you're ok and getting on well - do let me know if you have any problems. ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 17:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Thanks again for your responses. I've given you new tasks to complete (sorry for taking a little while). I think we're nearly there now: once you've got through all of the lessons and tasks, I will give you 5 days in which I will monitor your progress and be around to answer questions. After that, I will set you a graduation test. If there are no major issues during the monitoring phase, and you do well on the test, you will graduate from the programme. At this point, if there is anything else you would like to be covered that has not, please let me know (there will be a brief section on page protection and speedy deletion after the current one). ItsZippy ( talk • contributions) 17:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)
Greetings,
Regarding the "Peter Greenaway" section of the "List of film director and cinematographer collaborations", I added some entries about that director's collaborations with Reinier van Brummelen, the reliability of which is easy to verify. Yet you reverted them (as well as some other minor updates). I would like to know the reasons why. Thanks in advance !
Best regards,
171.16.208.3 ( talk) 10:00, 29 June 2012 (UTC)