![]() |
Hi AnalyticCat!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
The article Manu K. Vora has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable businessman created in violation of the terms of use by a CU confirmed sock.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
13:52, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Gene Freidman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Negative BLP created by CU confirmed sock as a likely paid article in violation of the terms of use. Fits the trend of this sock farm of creating coatrack articles of BLP businessmen.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
04:09, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gene Freidman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gene Freidman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:54, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
![]() |
Hi AnalyticCat!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
The article Manu K. Vora has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable businessman created in violation of the terms of use by a CU confirmed sock.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
13:52, 28 July 2017 (UTC)
The article Gene Freidman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Negative BLP created by CU confirmed sock as a likely paid article in violation of the terms of use. Fits the trend of this sock farm of creating coatrack articles of BLP businessmen.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
TonyBallioni (
talk)
04:09, 29 July 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gene Freidman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gene Freidman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TonyBallioni ( talk) 21:54, 29 July 2017 (UTC)