Nomination of Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram ( talk) 10:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi AmyMHollywoodNow! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Captain Calm ( talk) 14:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from
Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Thank you.
Captain Calm (
talk)
14:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the article
Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be
verifiable and attributed to
reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or
mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a
circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at
Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at
Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you.
Kuru
(talk)
17:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Amber Martinez for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amber Martinez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Martinez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Calm ( talk) 13:46, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, AmyMHollywoodNow,
welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as
XZ2X (
talk ·
contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.
Captain Calm (
talk)
14:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
* oppose - I don't know any other wikipedia editors at all and I don't know who that person is. You seem to like to falsely accuse me a lot and I am feeling bullied and harassed. And I don't have multiple accounts either.
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Amber Martinez, Actress and Producer, at the 70th Cannes Film Festival.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Amber Martinez, Actress and Producer, at the 70th Cannes Film Festival.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.imdb.me/ambermartinez. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae ( talk) 16:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Amber Martinez, Actress and Producer.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Amber Martinez, Actress and Producer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.imdb.me/ambermartinez. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae ( talk) 16:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
GeneralNotability (
talk)
18:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
AmyMHollywoodNow ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
* Oppose/Keep - I have been continuously bullied by Captain Calm, since I have join. There is a pattern, you can check the feeds. Also, Captain Calm falsely accused me of using multiple accounts or knowing some individual with some weird letter name, who I don't know. Captain Calm caused all these problems, because that other user agreed that my page should be kept. So, like the bully, that Captain Calm has been and continues to be. That user, Captain Calm, made up all these fake claims and then terribly attacked this other user, because the other user, like myself, did not agree with Captain Calm's decision to delete my page. So that user attacked me and whomever the Z___ person is. If anything, this whole situation shows an abuse of power on Captain Calm's part. Especially, because I proved that Captain Calm Lied about nothing ever existing regarding the SAG-AFTRA Union Actress. It is not Captain Calm's say or not, whether a valid SAG-AFTRA Actress exists, works, and is clearly known, because she does, and this is solely a case of discrimination, abuse of power, and not caring about the building of Wikipedia and adding to the correct knowledge. If so, the page will stay. Soley on the basis, that this is a real person, a real actress, with real notable work. However, unfortunately for me, Captain Calm has been, what I can only constitute as cyber stalking, bullying, and discriminating against me, the entire time I have been on Wikipedia. Which is not that long. I feel harassed. I am a wonderful woman, and I do not deserve to be treated like this. Anyone does not deserve to be treated like this. I got on Wikipedia excited to update and help expand the encyclopedia with actual valid facts. The last few days, I have been instead feeling anxiety, general upsetedness, and have been bombarded by false accusations and deliberate attacks on my character. And then Captain Calm lied and roped others into his/her crap. I did not infringe on any copyright violations. That image is free public use, from the IMDb. Because it is used on several other sites and shared openly on public forums. So that is a lie also. I told P, that if Captain Calm didn't stop harassing me, that I was going to make a report to Wikipedia Foundation, then all of a sudden, I'm in copyright infringement and violating all these rules...Obviously retaliation toward me, for standing up for my truth and the integrity, of my articles and the valid sources, that I provided. I deserve my account access back, as I did not do anything wrong. Other than getting harassed by Captain Calm, who bullies people into this/her opinion....Captain Calm, is the one who should be blocked permanently. I wonder how many other pages Captain Calm deleted, because he/she didn't think it deserved a Wikipedia Page, even though, it was a valid public figure, like the profile I built for the SAG/AFTRA actress. Almost makes me think, Captain Calm is jealous, that I created the page first. And you should give that other user back his/her privileges back too. Because I don't know him and Captain Calm is just a bully and a liar. I would also like Captain Calm to stay away from me, as I feel unsafe, uncomfortable, and harassed by that user. AmyMHollywoodNow ( talk) 19:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please see WP:NPA and WP:GAB. No personal attacks in your unblock request (or anywhere else on Wikipedia), and talk about your actions, not those of other users. Additionally, your claim, "That image is free public use, from the IMDb. Because it is used on several other sites and shared openly on public forums." is clearly bogus. An image appearing on IMDB would almost never be public domain. That it appears on other sites and is shared openly also does not imply it is public domain. You'll need to demonstrate you clearly understand this, along with WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE, in order for any future unblock request to be considered. You'll also need to address the reason for your block. Yamla ( talk) 19:45, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
talk I did address the reason for my unblock request, Captain Calm lied and falsely accused me of having multiple accounts. I don't have multiple accounts. Then he lied and accused some other user of being a sock or whatever. I don't even know what a sock is and I don't know that other user, who voted to keep my page. We are two different people and I do not know him/her. So Captain Calm accused that other user of being a fake person and accused me of having multiple accounts. Well I don't know that person and I don't have multiple accounts. That is two people, that just did not agree with Captain Calm. And, I understand your point about the picture, now that I read your links. So I want to be unblocked please and I want Captain Calm to stay away from me, as again, I feel uncomfortable with that user. I will put up a different photo on the page too. AmyMHollywoodNow ( talk) 20:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
AmyMHollywoodNow ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I did address the reason for my unblock request, Captain Calm lied and falsely accused me of having multiple accounts. I don't have multiple accounts. Then he lied and accused some other user of being a sock or whatever (User XZ Something...). I don't even know what a sock is and I don't know that other user, who voted to keep my page. We are two different people and I do not know him/her. So Captain Calm accused that other user of being a fake person and accused me of having multiple accounts. Well I don't know that person and I don't have multiple accounts. That is two people, that just did not agree with Captain Calm. And, I understand your point about the picture, now that I read your links. So I want to be unblocked please and I want Captain Calm to stay away from me, as again, I feel uncomfortable with that user. I will put up a different photo on the page too. AmyMHollywoodNow ( talk) 20:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're still talking about other users; your request should only address your own actions- and merely denying sockpuppetry is insufficient. You'll need to address why we might think that you are a sockpuppet/using other accounts when you aren't. You should also be aware of No Legal Threats- which you come close to making below. 331dot ( talk) 09:13, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Please see UTRS appeal #37144 Taskforce51mc admits to socking. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- The concerns raised at the SPI case have not been addressed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
* Oppose/Keep User talk:Deepfriedokra - Well, I would like to address them directly, however, User: GeneralNotability and User: Praxidicae, have blocked me, from being able to respond to their false accusations regarding myself and my account. I am unable to create a Talk Page to respond to the false allegations. And for the last time, I did not create this page to "Promote". I created this page to add to the encyclopedia, because she is a recognized person, who performs of notable movie credits and she is a SAG-AFTRA union actress. She is a real public figure. I don't appreciate all the Harassment...She is a valid SAG-AFTRA notable actress/performer...Many of my added 25+ confirming sources that I had added to the article, were subsequently removed and only 3 were left. Including magazine articles written about Amber and the Front Page Article of the Los Angeles Tribune, news article that I had attached to the page. By of course, the people whom are harassing me.
- Captain Calm left you a welcome and standard notifications. Nothing you should feel uncomfortable about. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
* Oppose/Keep User talk:Deepfriedokra - Not true, TaskForce whatever his name is...He probably knows the SAG-AFTRA actress that I wrote the page about. I also looked at his comments on the AFD page...Apparently Captain Calm just goes around and falsely accuses everyone of terrible things, who does not agree with him and then bullies and forces bad votes, by accusing all users who oppose his ideals, of "socking" and "alternative motives", and "dangerous editing". Captain Calm left 1 welcome message, the rest harassment. You clearly did not look at all of the other harassing comments and false accusations that Captain Calm has made about me only basically everything I have created and all deletion discussion pages. He has harassed me from day 1 and there are multiple records, that I saved screen shots of...In addition, creating a category associated with my name, also constitutes legally as a Form of Harassment! By the way, I am contacting the Wikipedia Foundation, regarding all of this and reporting users who assist in these forms of harassment as well. AmyMHollywoodNow ( talk) 07:34, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Please do not alter my comment. ( talk) 09:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
* Oppose - 331dot talk I did not come close or ever make any Legal Threats, I stated "In addition, creating a category associated with my name, also constitutes legally as a Form of Harassment"...That is a valid fact, not a threat.
- I said that you came close to a legal threat, not that you made one. Saying that comments towards you are legally harassment is clearly intended to have a chilling effect on other editors and while you did not threaten legal action, I'm not sure what other reason there would be to mention that. Please focus your unblock requests on your own actions. 331dot ( talk) 10:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- I'm also not sure why you are putting "oppose" and "keep" as if this is a vote; this is not a vote, but a discussion. 331dot ( talk) 10:15, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
AmyMHollywoodNow ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet. I only have 1 user account, 1 IP address, and 1 Email. I do not know the other 2 users, that Voted "Keep" on the AFD page. It seems like Users Votes, are not being fairly counted at all. Just because they happen to know about Amber Martinez and want to keep the page, does not mean, that they are fake accounts. Upon further observation, of looking at their User pages, they are clearly valid users. In addition, my page shouldn't even be up for AFD anyways, here is more valid proof, that she is a recognized public figure: Amazon Prime Amber Martinez Actress officially recognized by Amazon and their company: https://www.amazon.com/prime-video/actor/Amber-Martinez/nm3276688/ and Officially recognized by Blu-Ray.com - https://www.blu-ray.com/Amber-Martinez/833312/ AmyMHollywoodNow ( talk) 10:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You need to explain why Taskforce51mc would be on the same IP address as you. Most of the other stuff you mentioned is irrelevant. See Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks for instructions on requesting an unblock. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 20:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AmyMHollywoodNow ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I do not know, how Taskforce51mc, was able to get on the same IP address as me. I live in Los Angeles, in a building of 300 inhabitants, surrounded by a lot of other buildings, and we all use Spectrum internet cable. Anyone, could have accessed my IP address. I have reported this issue to my internet provider. Thanks for the heads up. Please unblock me. Thanks. AmyMHollywoodNow (talk) 09:42, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I do not know, how Taskforce51mc, was able to get on the same IP address as me. I don't either, but it's irrelevant. Yes, some IP addresses serve lots of users at once. But you avoid the real question, which is the incredible coincidence of this editor who just happens to live in your neighborhood going onto Wikipedia and starting an account that immediately starts editing ... the deletion discussion about an article about yourself that you created. Hmm. I wonder how that could have happened (Actually, I don't; that's why I'm not only denying this unblock but I'm revoking access to your talk page so you aren't tempted to strain our credulity again. Let us know how it goes with your ISP. Happy Holidays!). — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:36, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Daniel Case ( talk) 07:39, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Royal Order of Obeng II, Heraldic Badge Design.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused image for a made-up award.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
GeneralNotability (
talk)
21:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
The file File:H.E. Amber Martinez, Madame la baronne de Martinez, Coat of Arms.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused image, appears to be a vanity coat of arms.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
GeneralNotability (
talk)
21:52, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Fram ( talk) 10:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Hi AmyMHollywoodNow! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Captain Calm ( talk) 14:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from
Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your
sandbox. Thank you.
Captain Calm (
talk)
14:12, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Thanks for contributing to the article
Royal Order of the Golden Fire Dog. However, one of Wikipedia's core policies is that material must be
verifiable and attributed to
reliable sources. You have recently used citations which copied, or
mirrored, material from Wikipedia. This leads to a
circular reference and is not acceptable. Most mirrors are clearly labeled as such, but some are in violation of our license and do not provide the correct attribution. Please help by adding alternate sources to the article you edited! If you need any help or clarification, you can look at
Help:Contents/Editing Wikipedia or ask at
Wikipedia:New contributors' help page, or just ask me. Thank you.
Kuru
(talk)
17:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Amber Martinez for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amber Martinez is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amber Martinez until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Captain Calm ( talk) 13:46, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Hello, AmyMHollywoodNow,
welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for
your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as
XZ2X (
talk ·
contribs). Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you.
Captain Calm (
talk)
14:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
* oppose - I don't know any other wikipedia editors at all and I don't know who that person is. You seem to like to falsely accuse me a lot and I am feeling bullied and harassed. And I don't have multiple accounts either.
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Amber Martinez, Actress and Producer, at the 70th Cannes Film Festival.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Amber Martinez, Actress and Producer, at the 70th Cannes Film Festival.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.imdb.me/ambermartinez. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae ( talk) 16:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Amber Martinez, Actress and Producer.jpg
A tag has been placed on File:Amber Martinez, Actress and Producer.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement of https://www.imdb.me/ambermartinez. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Praxidicae ( talk) 16:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.
GeneralNotability (
talk)
18:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)AmyMHollywoodNow ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
* Oppose/Keep - I have been continuously bullied by Captain Calm, since I have join. There is a pattern, you can check the feeds. Also, Captain Calm falsely accused me of using multiple accounts or knowing some individual with some weird letter name, who I don't know. Captain Calm caused all these problems, because that other user agreed that my page should be kept. So, like the bully, that Captain Calm has been and continues to be. That user, Captain Calm, made up all these fake claims and then terribly attacked this other user, because the other user, like myself, did not agree with Captain Calm's decision to delete my page. So that user attacked me and whomever the Z___ person is. If anything, this whole situation shows an abuse of power on Captain Calm's part. Especially, because I proved that Captain Calm Lied about nothing ever existing regarding the SAG-AFTRA Union Actress. It is not Captain Calm's say or not, whether a valid SAG-AFTRA Actress exists, works, and is clearly known, because she does, and this is solely a case of discrimination, abuse of power, and not caring about the building of Wikipedia and adding to the correct knowledge. If so, the page will stay. Soley on the basis, that this is a real person, a real actress, with real notable work. However, unfortunately for me, Captain Calm has been, what I can only constitute as cyber stalking, bullying, and discriminating against me, the entire time I have been on Wikipedia. Which is not that long. I feel harassed. I am a wonderful woman, and I do not deserve to be treated like this. Anyone does not deserve to be treated like this. I got on Wikipedia excited to update and help expand the encyclopedia with actual valid facts. The last few days, I have been instead feeling anxiety, general upsetedness, and have been bombarded by false accusations and deliberate attacks on my character. And then Captain Calm lied and roped others into his/her crap. I did not infringe on any copyright violations. That image is free public use, from the IMDb. Because it is used on several other sites and shared openly on public forums. So that is a lie also. I told P, that if Captain Calm didn't stop harassing me, that I was going to make a report to Wikipedia Foundation, then all of a sudden, I'm in copyright infringement and violating all these rules...Obviously retaliation toward me, for standing up for my truth and the integrity, of my articles and the valid sources, that I provided. I deserve my account access back, as I did not do anything wrong. Other than getting harassed by Captain Calm, who bullies people into this/her opinion....Captain Calm, is the one who should be blocked permanently. I wonder how many other pages Captain Calm deleted, because he/she didn't think it deserved a Wikipedia Page, even though, it was a valid public figure, like the profile I built for the SAG/AFTRA actress. Almost makes me think, Captain Calm is jealous, that I created the page first. And you should give that other user back his/her privileges back too. Because I don't know him and Captain Calm is just a bully and a liar. I would also like Captain Calm to stay away from me, as I feel unsafe, uncomfortable, and harassed by that user. AmyMHollywoodNow ( talk) 19:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please see WP:NPA and WP:GAB. No personal attacks in your unblock request (or anywhere else on Wikipedia), and talk about your actions, not those of other users. Additionally, your claim, "That image is free public use, from the IMDb. Because it is used on several other sites and shared openly on public forums." is clearly bogus. An image appearing on IMDB would almost never be public domain. That it appears on other sites and is shared openly also does not imply it is public domain. You'll need to demonstrate you clearly understand this, along with WP:COPYRIGHT and WP:FAIRUSE, in order for any future unblock request to be considered. You'll also need to address the reason for your block. Yamla ( talk) 19:45, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
talk I did address the reason for my unblock request, Captain Calm lied and falsely accused me of having multiple accounts. I don't have multiple accounts. Then he lied and accused some other user of being a sock or whatever. I don't even know what a sock is and I don't know that other user, who voted to keep my page. We are two different people and I do not know him/her. So Captain Calm accused that other user of being a fake person and accused me of having multiple accounts. Well I don't know that person and I don't have multiple accounts. That is two people, that just did not agree with Captain Calm. And, I understand your point about the picture, now that I read your links. So I want to be unblocked please and I want Captain Calm to stay away from me, as again, I feel uncomfortable with that user. I will put up a different photo on the page too. AmyMHollywoodNow ( talk) 20:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
AmyMHollywoodNow ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I did address the reason for my unblock request, Captain Calm lied and falsely accused me of having multiple accounts. I don't have multiple accounts. Then he lied and accused some other user of being a sock or whatever (User XZ Something...). I don't even know what a sock is and I don't know that other user, who voted to keep my page. We are two different people and I do not know him/her. So Captain Calm accused that other user of being a fake person and accused me of having multiple accounts. Well I don't know that person and I don't have multiple accounts. That is two people, that just did not agree with Captain Calm. And, I understand your point about the picture, now that I read your links. So I want to be unblocked please and I want Captain Calm to stay away from me, as again, I feel uncomfortable with that user. I will put up a different photo on the page too. AmyMHollywoodNow ( talk) 20:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You're still talking about other users; your request should only address your own actions- and merely denying sockpuppetry is insufficient. You'll need to address why we might think that you are a sockpuppet/using other accounts when you aren't. You should also be aware of No Legal Threats- which you come close to making below. 331dot ( talk) 09:13, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Please see UTRS appeal #37144 Taskforce51mc admits to socking. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- The concerns raised at the SPI case have not been addressed. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 03:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
* Oppose/Keep User talk:Deepfriedokra - Well, I would like to address them directly, however, User: GeneralNotability and User: Praxidicae, have blocked me, from being able to respond to their false accusations regarding myself and my account. I am unable to create a Talk Page to respond to the false allegations. And for the last time, I did not create this page to "Promote". I created this page to add to the encyclopedia, because she is a recognized person, who performs of notable movie credits and she is a SAG-AFTRA union actress. She is a real public figure. I don't appreciate all the Harassment...She is a valid SAG-AFTRA notable actress/performer...Many of my added 25+ confirming sources that I had added to the article, were subsequently removed and only 3 were left. Including magazine articles written about Amber and the Front Page Article of the Los Angeles Tribune, news article that I had attached to the page. By of course, the people whom are harassing me.
- Captain Calm left you a welcome and standard notifications. Nothing you should feel uncomfortable about. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 04:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
* Oppose/Keep User talk:Deepfriedokra - Not true, TaskForce whatever his name is...He probably knows the SAG-AFTRA actress that I wrote the page about. I also looked at his comments on the AFD page...Apparently Captain Calm just goes around and falsely accuses everyone of terrible things, who does not agree with him and then bullies and forces bad votes, by accusing all users who oppose his ideals, of "socking" and "alternative motives", and "dangerous editing". Captain Calm left 1 welcome message, the rest harassment. You clearly did not look at all of the other harassing comments and false accusations that Captain Calm has made about me only basically everything I have created and all deletion discussion pages. He has harassed me from day 1 and there are multiple records, that I saved screen shots of...In addition, creating a category associated with my name, also constitutes legally as a Form of Harassment! By the way, I am contacting the Wikipedia Foundation, regarding all of this and reporting users who assist in these forms of harassment as well. AmyMHollywoodNow ( talk) 07:34, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- Please do not alter my comment. ( talk) 09:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
* Oppose - 331dot talk I did not come close or ever make any Legal Threats, I stated "In addition, creating a category associated with my name, also constitutes legally as a Form of Harassment"...That is a valid fact, not a threat.
- I said that you came close to a legal threat, not that you made one. Saying that comments towards you are legally harassment is clearly intended to have a chilling effect on other editors and while you did not threaten legal action, I'm not sure what other reason there would be to mention that. Please focus your unblock requests on your own actions. 331dot ( talk) 10:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
- I'm also not sure why you are putting "oppose" and "keep" as if this is a vote; this is not a vote, but a discussion. 331dot ( talk) 10:15, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
AmyMHollywoodNow ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I am not a sockpuppet. I only have 1 user account, 1 IP address, and 1 Email. I do not know the other 2 users, that Voted "Keep" on the AFD page. It seems like Users Votes, are not being fairly counted at all. Just because they happen to know about Amber Martinez and want to keep the page, does not mean, that they are fake accounts. Upon further observation, of looking at their User pages, they are clearly valid users. In addition, my page shouldn't even be up for AFD anyways, here is more valid proof, that she is a recognized public figure: Amazon Prime Amber Martinez Actress officially recognized by Amazon and their company: https://www.amazon.com/prime-video/actor/Amber-Martinez/nm3276688/ and Officially recognized by Blu-Ray.com - https://www.blu-ray.com/Amber-Martinez/833312/ AmyMHollywoodNow ( talk) 10:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You need to explain why Taskforce51mc would be on the same IP address as you. Most of the other stuff you mentioned is irrelevant. See Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks for instructions on requesting an unblock. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 20:33, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
AmyMHollywoodNow ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I do not know, how Taskforce51mc, was able to get on the same IP address as me. I live in Los Angeles, in a building of 300 inhabitants, surrounded by a lot of other buildings, and we all use Spectrum internet cable. Anyone, could have accessed my IP address. I have reported this issue to my internet provider. Thanks for the heads up. Please unblock me. Thanks. AmyMHollywoodNow (talk) 09:42, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I do not know, how Taskforce51mc, was able to get on the same IP address as me. I don't either, but it's irrelevant. Yes, some IP addresses serve lots of users at once. But you avoid the real question, which is the incredible coincidence of this editor who just happens to live in your neighborhood going onto Wikipedia and starting an account that immediately starts editing ... the deletion discussion about an article about yourself that you created. Hmm. I wonder how that could have happened (Actually, I don't; that's why I'm not only denying this unblock but I'm revoking access to your talk page so you aren't tempted to strain our credulity again. Let us know how it goes with your ISP. Happy Holidays!). — Daniel Case ( talk) 07:36, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.
Daniel Case ( talk) 07:39, 28 November 2020 (UTC)
The file File:Royal Order of Obeng II, Heraldic Badge Design.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused image for a made-up award.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
GeneralNotability (
talk)
21:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
The file File:H.E. Amber Martinez, Madame la baronne de Martinez, Coat of Arms.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Unused image, appears to be a vanity coat of arms.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
files for discussion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
GeneralNotability (
talk)
21:52, 9 December 2020 (UTC)