I have added a description for Mirador Instant Messenger since it is a server based instant messenger solution if i need to edit portion of the text then i will do it but there are descriptions for sametime live server etc so what should i do exactly to keep the listing —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Upswing ( talk • contribs) .
I'd love to be a moderator; however, if turning me into one causes too much stress and work, then I'd rather you don't for your sake. But if there is an opening, sure! P.S. Also, I like the edit summaries; especially the Rammstein. :P
_-M
o
P-_
06:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Note: These were posted above, but I think you missed them as they were hidden away.
(carriage return), yeah, thats another bug... The solution for me was to 1) go to file>startpage or 2) exit the program and reopen.
Thus, I hereby order you to GO TO BED, we need you in good shape... at least for awhile:-) Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 07:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
No worries, if you think it can be kept as notable I have no problems whatsoever with it, its cleaned up a fair bit and not exactly G4. -- Tawker 06:05, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry to ask, but it would be nice to have the next version, as least the bug fixes... that way I can dump about 3 more bugs on you!!! Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 07:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
AmiDaniel: the edge hippies article is straight vanity/OR/nonsense. I am putting it on VFD AFD and taking off the merge tags. This merge suggestion will just start a furore among sXe people who are unfamiliar with Wikipedia protocol, and will involve far more expenditure of energy than can be justified for some kid's narcissistic little project.
Mgekelly -
Talk
08:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for voting at my RFA. Even though you did not vote for me, your counsel was appreciated. In the next few months, I intend to work on expanding my involvement in other namespaces and try a few different subjects than in the past. - CTSWyneken Talk |
So that is how you set the Mods! I assume it only works when you do it?
Prodego talk 00:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Actually, I don't think it would not be smart to let other users add moderators, especially if it were the mods who could do it, because then one person could... Prodego talk 02:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Hmm... I do know at that time I started up Vandalproof, but it kinda froze on me, so I used Alt+Ctrl+Delete to forcibly kill it. I can't remember making any edits to that page, and the summary is wierd, so I think it may be a bug. _-M o P-_ 02:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
i was just wondering why it is such a big deal and an opposing inconvenience to delete the edge hippies. i dont believe anyone has the right to call someone a sock puppet, as an insult. are the edge hippies discriminative in any possible way? ( Talk) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Merchantofvenice ( talk • contribs) .
I was just wondering if you could shed some light on my problem; I'm forced to use VandalProof without any of the cool features, because for some wierd reason, the "Revert/warn" buttons are always greyed out. When a page loads, first the I.E. error thing flashes up, then the buttons flash from grey to black and back. I'm not sure how to correct this (have uninstalled and reinstalled a few times). _-M o P-_ 06:25, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I haven't seen you have tests, or else I wouldn't have bothered you. Either way, I managed to salvage the bulk of my black list through my vandalism log, and VandalProof works fine after re-installing. Good luck with your exam! -- Chodorkovskiy (talk) 06:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
To continue User_talk:AmiDaniel/Archive3#delete_please...
I didn't know about {{ db-author}}, I've always used {{ delete}}. I learn something new (almost) every day!
and now for something completely different...
I'm not doing much VandalProof stuff (since it keeps giving me script errors and not acknowledging my sign-in), but I've also had troubles with IE so I've deleted the IE .exe until I can resolve the issue (which isn't VandalProof) but I'll moderate the pages/requests for now and if there's anything you need, just let me know.
—
nath
a
nrd
o
tcom (
T •
C •
W)
07:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Enjoy your break Daniel, I have just returned from one myself (in case you were wondering why I've been so quiet!) Will hold the reigns in your absense. Have a great one! - Gl e n T C (Stollery) 09:53, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
...just wondering, it sounds like you'll be facing either GCSEs or A-Levels, which one is it? Good luck! -- gtdp (T)/ (C) 19:19, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
...for adding that comment to my post on WP:AIV. My first couple of posts there, so I'm still getting the hang of it. Anyway did you see the other post I made to the page? What do you think of that? Should I have reported that or sorted it out myself?
Thanks
Srik
e
it(
talk ¦
✉)
21:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
I think we should remove the section "Mama's Boy" from the Elvis Presley page. There is no credible source to suggest that Presley had sex with his mother. No reputable biographer as ever made that statement and the user (Onefortyone) who is pushing the change has a history of citing to questionable sources, purposefully misinterpreting secondary sources, and overtly pushing his own agenda on the Presley page. I think we need significant evidence before we accuse someone, in an encyclopedia no less, of incest.
Lochdale —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lochdale ( talk • contribs) .
Actually it isn't well sourced. You have twisted sources in an effort to push your own agenda. For example, of the 2,000 plus books written about Presley, you managed to find two that even come close to supporting your position. You have what can only be described as an obsession with Presley's sex life. The quotes from Guralnik that Elvis was close with his mother do not say, suggest or even imply that Elvis was having an incestual relationship with her. To say that they do is an out and out fabrication. Moreover, Elvis' stepmother makes these claims in an unpublished manuscript that is so out of left field that noone will actually publish it. Lastly, Marcus does not claim that Presley had an incestous relationship with his mother. You either misrepresent sources or provide less than credible sources. The section should be removed. Lochdale
Comment' Could you please move this discussion to Talk:Elvis Presley? I'm having to archive my talk page on a biweekly basis as it is and would rather not constantly be prompted that I have new messages everytime you two respond to each other about a matter in which I'm not involved. Thanks. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 23:05, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
-- Av i ll ia ( RfC vs CVU) 22:40, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
If you wish, you can take me off, but I figured out what was doing it. I opened up the moderator tools thing to approve users; both times, a bunch of messages flashed up which I closed. I think thats it. So if I avoid using that, I should be good. P.S. I use Firefox, not IE. _-M o P-_ 01:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Would you accept a nomination, your additions have been amazing and the tools could surely help you out a bit. I noticed just today that you investigate AIV a lot, perhaps the shiny buttons would be of good use to you. Would you accept a nomination at this time? -- Tawker 05:01, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Well, VandalProof is in the same scope as Tawkerbot2, now if only I could fix this javascript error and get it to work :o -- Tawker 06:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Daniel, just a wee heads up that the prod function needs to be changed to be {{subst:prod)} as it somes up with an error at mo. No biggie just FYI. God bless! - Gl e n T C (Stollery) 18:57, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out on WP:AIV. The extra hand is most welcome and appreciated. ➨ ≡ Я Ξ DVΞRS ≡ 22:10, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
what did i do? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chelseachav ( talk • contribs) .
i didnt do anything wrong and you are giving me warnings. all i wrote was that he was a liverpool fc supporter and you have a go at me?????? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chelseachav ( talk • contribs) .
Do you mind if I put old (fixed on current release) bugs on an archive. This will make the bug report page easier to read, and shorter. Thanks for making me a moderator, I will soon begin to update bugs, right now I think we have most of them on the startup page. Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 00:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thanks for your kind words on my RFA AmiDaniel. Heh, I always laugh when I see your name, because I AM daniel. Anyway, good luck on your exams. I hope you do better than I did on mine =P ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 00:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
It is a true statement that the geographic south pole is the magnetic north pole. Look up magnetism on a physics website. I'm in AP physics. I know what I'm talking about. 24.163.169.250 05:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
-- Daveinaustin 05:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)-- Daveinaustin 05:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC) I am going to bed now, but I will go through them line by line tomorrow, and I'll cite specific sources. For instance, it is very clear (established fact) that
I'll go through all the other edits, too. Whoever has been reverting my stuff on this, franken, and david remnick, is dead wrong. I have probably read more of all their stuff than virtually anyone on here. Really. I am not a crank.
Hi there. I'm a bit new to wikipedia so I was wondering if you could perhaps help me out. I'm sure that you've seen a few examples of what the user Daveinaustin has been doing as of late, and I'd like to have a RfC concerning this. Do you think you could help me out here? I'm a bit clueless as to how I should go about it.
Thanks!
Mister Mister 06:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree with your removing 206.207.158.202 from the list because it has not vandalized for awhile, but you were dead wrong in calling it a content dispute, see [11] and you might also want to see the rest of his contribs. Pegasus1138 Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 06:46, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I answered on my talk page. -- Mbimmler 08:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Cool that he's been added just makes me look stupid for all my recommendations to him just yesterday I guess - Gl e n T C (Stollery) 21:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I just want to make sure that my approval of GeorgeMoney is OK with you, although this user has less then 250 article edits, his editing history seemed good, so I approved him. If you believe approving him was incorrect, remove him from the authorized users, and let me know. Thanks, Prodego talk 23:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Now, pretend that's real and get studying Mr! :) - Gl e n T C (Stollery) 01:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\*\shell\gview] @="Open With Notepad" [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\*\shell\gview\command] @="C:\\WINDOWS\\NOTEPAD.EXE %1"
That's actually {{ welcomeg}} (yes, the g signifies that it's the 7th of its kind; there are a lot of welcome templates), which happened to be someone else's personal welcome template and was moved to template space a bit ago. I do agree that a welcomebot would be great; the only downside is that it might somehow be slightly less meaningful than when I welcome people as fast as I can to annoy people in #vandalism-en-wp that have me on their blacklist. -- Rory096 03:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry for not providing an edit summary, but I only deleted those articles because there is no concrete proof of them. It was someone else who was vandalising the page. I was only fixing it. Please change it back to how it was after I fixed it. TOP 04:57, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Here is what you do,
Just use this script to keep you on your wikibreak. -- George Mon e y Talk Contribs 05:30, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
GAHH!!! The damn tool is too easy to hack. It uses local system time rather than Wiki time. Now my computer thinks it's May 21st and I'm back on Wikipedia. Okay, signing off for the very last time. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 05:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, sorry about my early vandalism, i just wanted to add to the site to help it but an admin has deleted my Super Toad article. I got his username and here it is!! Adashiel!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jlhc ( talk • contribs) .
I think you may have erased Blnguyen's vote in updating the tally. See
[12]
--
Srik
e
it(
talk ¦
✉)
01:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
-- Av ill ia 03:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
I was just wondering if I could have my moderator priveledges back, pweeze. I promise to be good, and the main bug was with me accessing the user list; I think that if I only do it when there are users who want to be approved, nothing will happen. You don't have to give them back, of course, but I was just wondering. Thanks, _-M o P-_ 22:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
DON'T respond to this!!! Eagle ( talk) ( desk)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 18 | 1 May 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
I see you are having a hard time... my suggestion is this... comprimise:-)
1) Leave new users, forums, abuse, and updating the welcome page to the "moderators".
2) respond to difficult bugs that require knowledge of the source code. (like the new user list blanking) ect. respond to other bugs... but if they are really easy leave them to me and other programmers. (I am competent in this area, as I just finished a C++ "pure" arbitrary number class, allows calculations with numbers as large as availible memery:-)---.
Please relize Wikipedia won't fall down just because you are not there!
I modified your edits on closing this AfD to what I think is a more reasonable organization, per my argument in the discussion and my edit comments (if we should mention one member of the Academy in its article, I don't think it should be one about whom we, so far, know too little to even have an article.) Hope that's OK with you. u p p l a n d 07:00, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I do not like Tom Cruise. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.231.241.72 ( talk • contribs) .
Hey Mister! LOG OFF NOW!! -- George Mon e y Talk Contribs 04:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
I have used this site a few times and i wish to inquire how you make sure your information is all completely accurate, due to the fact that anybody can access this website and add their own information, even if it is invalid. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 211.30.98.98 ( talk • contribs) .
I got your message regarding the program, and I totally understand. I will become more experienced in editing and catching vandals, then I will reapply. Thank you for informing me that I was rejected, though. That way, I didn't have to worry about not finding out and just getting dissed. XD
Quadrius —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quadrius ( talk • contribs) 19:10 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Dear AmiDaniel/Archive4,
Aren't you on a Wikibreak? Anyway, I was wondering something about VandalProof. I spend almost all my time nowadays reverting vandalism (especially on the Green Day and RuneScape articles). I applied for using your VP once before, and I was denied approval because I did not have 250 edits. Now I have 249. But I read closely at what the admin sent me in my "denial" notice and it says in these exact words "... must have at least 250 article edits...". Now does that mean 250 edits in the article namespace or 250 edits anywhere? I was just wondering because I really want to use vandalproof. Really it looks like a great tool. Right now, I go and revert vandalism, then by the time I do that and go leave the user a warning message on his talk page, a few other people did more vandalism, which I once again must revert, warn the vandals, and so on. Cheers! Wikipeedio 23:39, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
For the Anti V barnstar. My vandal "slapping" has greatly improved since I got VandalProof. As a result, my User page is now a target of revenge. So I know I'm doing something right! Cheers and take care! Anger22 09:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
I wish to give u a app. for co-owner of Cody Inc.(last one just quit becuase i lowered his pay from $200 an hour to $94 a hour lol)(U WONT GET PAID) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Codyman3 ( talk • contribs) .
MWHAHAHA I OWN U MWAHAHAHAHA Just Kidding i thought was funny —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Codyman3 ( talk • contribs) .
Stop editing or I'll attack! Get back to work. :D —
nathanrd
o
tco
m (Got something to say?
Say it.)
03:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello AmiDaniel!
The articles Church in india and True Jesus Church india (which was created User:True jesus, who is a vandal) should be deleted because the original article already existed with the True Jesus Church in India. Jose77 21:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
uh... what the title says. You have better things to do!! Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 23:45, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Its the first time I ever used the Notify AIV function and I obviously messed it up as it added you instead of the IP address (you actually warned of the same IP anyway) - I quickly removed but not a good look. Oops my bad, sorry! - Gl e n T C (Stollery) 00:08, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
I have begun to get rid of old bugs on the bug report page, I am not removing anything that may be of help to other users I put all bug reports that I deleted in an archive called User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs/Version 1.1.0 and older fixes. It is linked to at the top of the Bug report page.
P.S. You dont need to respond unless you have suggestions for me, else your silence is all I need. Eagle talk 02:38, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Comply with what your talk page says, get off and study!!!! Have you willpower? Eagle talk 03:19, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Geeze. 3 more contribs after this...
Can you stop... plus why is your monobook blocked, I was going to impose you wikibreak on you!!!! by the wikibreak enforcer... Its a shame that you ask us to block you, but then give us no means to do so... Eagle talk 03:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Though I thought I would note that you have now exceeded 500 edits while on "wikibreak" and that is over less than 10 days, May I ask what kind of break is that??? Eagle talk 03:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
03:53, 7 May 2006 (hist) (diff) m User talk:AmiDaniel (→What am I to do - Such a heavy burden to be the one...)
He responded on the bug report pages... I found it because I have been doing some work there, removing old bugs
User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs#'Your log-in request failed' (back to square one)... Eagle talk 04:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Note the ones I had in green text, that signals that the info is useful to others and needs to be on 1) the welcome page or 2) elsewhere. Eagle talk 04:31, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
We will figure that out later, once you decide, let me know, and I will automatically replace the whole page, by bot user:Gnome (Bot), so it is not a big deal, as that can be done by automation. Eagle talk 05:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
AmiDaniel (
Talk)
04:42, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
LOL, I would leave the red fonts though, I find them very attention getting for you, and perhaps more important, others who are putting bugs of there own in. Eagle talk
Lol, I am working on the lightning bolt now... I am going to have to look over the green check marks... remember, If they are fixed, I am going archive them. If you noticed I did not archive any green titles, that is because they are a "user help" thing, Perhaps we need to make a page called trouble shooting??? Eagle talk 04:46, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
I will be glad to write the FAQ, this is my thing:-) I will get to it in about 15 min... and I can tell pretty well what has been fixed, my suggestion to you is to look at some of those "red" flags, as some are really old, and you have not replyed. Eagle talk 04:52, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
lol... we really should not be editconflicting... because soooomebody is not even supposed to be here...
that aside, I just figured out your last revert, I will have to sort this out agian, please give me 5 minutes without you editing on the bug fix page... Eagle talk 05:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Please tell me what the four symbols are for....
04:58, 7 May 2006 (hist) (diff) User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs (New format ... hopefully without an edit conflict ... goddammit, sorry whoever's edits I just removed!) (top)
Funny, you could not tell it was me... who else would it be?? Eagle talk 05:04, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Change the definition of check mark to potentally usefull to other users.... As under the current definition they all will go to archive:-) Eagle talk 05:16, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
when is which used, unresolved and uhhh not fixed are one and the same. Eagle talk 05:40, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Make note of it in the conversation... remember I or others can't read inbetween the lines! Eagle talk 05:57, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Go and look please, Mod functions not recognizing my update to main program page(you know which one). Eagle talk 08:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
See if you can recognize my removal of the test edit. Eagle talk 08:37, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
I did, but it won't pick it up... Eagle talk 08:44, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Have fun with it... By the way I successfully added a user... go figure, look it up in my contribs if you wish. And I need to sign Eagle talk 08:53, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey try this, put me in with out the underscore, I will relog in if I must. Eagle talk 08:59, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
HaHa edit conflict... I have not had one of those yet!!! honestly, not today
any way what I meant was reset the mods with my username with out an underscore
let me try it agian....
have a look
nope Eagle talk 09:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
oh and if you did not realize I ADDED a user with no problems at all, and my name states moderator as well. Any way, good night Eagle talk 09:22, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Oh and um, with all of those really nice features and fixes, such as no more popups, java, ect. Why not realease it now... you can always put out new revisions, but what you have is some MAJOR changes and would be very welcome to all. Eagle talk 09:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
|
|
One thing I noticed is that when VandalProof loads the users for approval, if the user messed up the formatting, the program goofs. Here is a possible solution using regexes, (Machine generated VB code, best I can do:-)
Public Dim Userfication as Regex = New Regex( _ "({{user2.*?}})", _ RegexOptions.IgnoreCase _ Or RegexOptions.CultureInvariant _ Or RegexOptions.IgnorePatternWhitespace _ Or RegexOptions.Compiled _ )
This looks for {{user2|<the user's name>}} if it is in the user2 template the code will pick it up. Hope this helps.
Eagle
talk
22:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about that, that was not intentional... (perhaps payback for your edit conflicts, oh enjoy comming up with other reasons:-) Eagle talk 00:04, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Look at my reply to you at Wikipedia:Signature Poll/GeorgeMoney. GeorgeMoney ( talk · contribs) 02:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Actually, that's the IP range used by the banned user Amorrow. It may be a little too broad to rangeblock. -- Curps 07:23, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
I am not vandalising, an opposing fan destroyed our page and I am removing all the stupid flags and words he used.
Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Airy ( talk • contribs) .
I noticed an attack on all cyprus soccer websites and I hope so that will not last long.
So I wanted to ask you if you thought I was experienced enough to use vandalproof. Other users are telling me that I am a little underexperienced, but I have over 250 edits. Just wanted to know what you thought. By the way, Ive been looking thru your talk page and see that you have a lot of exams and stuff. Are you in college or high school? Just curious. Wikipeedio 22:22, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thanks AmiDaniel for you comment on my rfa, after the concerns you raised i thought that it might bea good idea to answer them directly so that other pepole could also benifit from them, anyway thanks for the time you took to respond to my rfa, happy editing Benon 22:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ami,
Would it be possible to remove my messages on your page. This page came up on the google search engine near my personal website. Did not realise this was a blogg. Can you please help with some other stuff that has cropped up online.
Thanks.
<name removed> 00:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
you r mean —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.237.144.169 ( talk • contribs) .
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 19 | 8 May 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
I redirected CAD to CAD (disambiguation), but it was immediately reverted by User:ILovePlankton using VandalProof. That page was simply a less-comprehensive version of the latter page, and the redirection was totally in keeping with the sentiments expressed on its talk page. ILovePlankton should not be so trigger-happy. 86.40.156.73 19:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
As above, I'm shocked to see that you are watching my page! But thankyou, as I was not on last night... hence the lack of edit conflicts...I do do that to you rather often... that is weird:-). Please feel free to respond on my talk page anytime that you desire... I don't care, as long as the user gets the advice they need!!! Eagle talk 00:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about the evil thing on my userpage. I'll try to make it look more like a practical joke (link doesn't redirect to your talkpage)
-- Primat e #101 01:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Ami for instructing me, I am new to the Wiki ways and practices. By the way, what's your opinion in the "RAD Data Communications" deletion issue? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by John hyams ( talk • contribs) .
Glad you like it :) The things you mentioned were bothering me too. — kooo 06:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Are you a control freak? Do I need to get a permission from you to create an accout on wikipedia? What about your username? What if I say your user name is highly highly inappropriate? If an article with title "tru jesus church" can be very appropriate, how come a user name "true jesus" is highly inappropriate? BTW, I don't give a shit to threat of blocking my user name. I knew 1000 ways to get around it. I have only edited a crap article "true jesus church". User Jose77 and a couple others were keep begging for the article translation. They bug me and my friends too. What do you I should do such article? Translate it saying "True jesus church" is the only true church and others are crap? Should I say that if you go to true jesus church, you can fly in the air. There is no necessity of car, bus, plane or anything.. Is that what you think? Does such article deserve any place in wikipedia. Did you do anything to stop it? I am not even warning you. Lets see if you keep, or delete my comment.
-- True jesus 18:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
I know there are only four right now, but I choose to go ahead and create an archive. User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Abuse/May-June2006.
I set the policy for this as: Reports in which over 10 (ten) days have passed since the last post may be placed into archive.
I thought that this is most appropriate, as if nobody posts after 10 days, the issue is over. Eagle talk 20:13, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Your AN/I note raises, IMHO, some interesting questions apropos of this user. I certainly don't think his user name to be particularly disruptive (I am generally of the view that all user names should be permitted, inasmuch as I cannot imagine that valuable contributors would ever allow their imputing impropriety to a user name to disrupt the collaborative editing process, if only because I would necessarily infer intellectual infirmity from one's inability to cope with a user name he/she finds offensive, but I know that my beliefs don't command community support), even as a different user name might lend itself to better community interaction. I think the user certainly has been altogether trollish in his/her contributions, and I think a short block is likely in order. Because the user is relatively new, he/she may change his/her ways (as you well note on the user's talk page) and become a good editor; the fact of the user's user name and the singularity of his/her contributions, though, suggest an intent to troll/disrupt and lead one to fear that good faith is not present. You might be able to find support for an "exhausting the community's patience" indef block, but I think perhaps a 24-hr block might be in order, after which perhaps an RfC would be in order should disruption continue (I suppose one only needs to go that route, though, if the community doesn't think an indef block to be appropriate; here, since the user has shown no intention or capability to contribute productively, the community might quickly find its patience exhausted). Joe 21:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
for having an open mind. TheJ abb erw ʘck 06:32, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
I've been doing a lot of RC patrolling recently on Wikipedia and see a lot of people use your VandalProof application- when I looked into it, this page sent me here to request it!
Hope your Wikibreak was relaxing,
Kind regards,
EvocativeIntrigue 16:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I am Eagle talk, I am a fellow moderator on VP. Currently the program is not recognizing my user name as a moderator. As such the program does not always recognize some of the changes I make to the VP official welcom page. (you know what I am talking about). This problem has been documented on User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs#Moderator update is not working. I request a "Null" edit to that page, The reason is a user I added is having problems logging in.
No longer needed, I posted this becuase I figured you would be on, agianst your wikibreak:-( Eagle talk 22:25, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
fisrt off... back to the usual. (you getting an edit conflict:-)
Second, thank you for confirming that, I suspected that you did that on purpose:-) No matter what, you have connect to the internet with an open browser, and you would rather your program work on connecting to the internet and checking the approved list, rather than generating some fancy graphic:-). I have done this also for similar reasons on programs of my own:-).
I have added a description for Mirador Instant Messenger since it is a server based instant messenger solution if i need to edit portion of the text then i will do it but there are descriptions for sametime live server etc so what should i do exactly to keep the listing —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Upswing ( talk • contribs) .
I'd love to be a moderator; however, if turning me into one causes too much stress and work, then I'd rather you don't for your sake. But if there is an opening, sure! P.S. Also, I like the edit summaries; especially the Rammstein. :P
_-M
o
P-_
06:03, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Note: These were posted above, but I think you missed them as they were hidden away.
(carriage return), yeah, thats another bug... The solution for me was to 1) go to file>startpage or 2) exit the program and reopen.
Thus, I hereby order you to GO TO BED, we need you in good shape... at least for awhile:-) Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 07:41, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
No worries, if you think it can be kept as notable I have no problems whatsoever with it, its cleaned up a fair bit and not exactly G4. -- Tawker 06:05, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry to ask, but it would be nice to have the next version, as least the bug fixes... that way I can dump about 3 more bugs on you!!! Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 07:35, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
AmiDaniel: the edge hippies article is straight vanity/OR/nonsense. I am putting it on VFD AFD and taking off the merge tags. This merge suggestion will just start a furore among sXe people who are unfamiliar with Wikipedia protocol, and will involve far more expenditure of energy than can be justified for some kid's narcissistic little project.
Mgekelly -
Talk
08:02, 26 April 2006 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for voting at my RFA. Even though you did not vote for me, your counsel was appreciated. In the next few months, I intend to work on expanding my involvement in other namespaces and try a few different subjects than in the past. - CTSWyneken Talk |
So that is how you set the Mods! I assume it only works when you do it?
Prodego talk 00:30, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Actually, I don't think it would not be smart to let other users add moderators, especially if it were the mods who could do it, because then one person could... Prodego talk 02:24, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Hmm... I do know at that time I started up Vandalproof, but it kinda froze on me, so I used Alt+Ctrl+Delete to forcibly kill it. I can't remember making any edits to that page, and the summary is wierd, so I think it may be a bug. _-M o P-_ 02:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
i was just wondering why it is such a big deal and an opposing inconvenience to delete the edge hippies. i dont believe anyone has the right to call someone a sock puppet, as an insult. are the edge hippies discriminative in any possible way? ( Talk) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Merchantofvenice ( talk • contribs) .
I was just wondering if you could shed some light on my problem; I'm forced to use VandalProof without any of the cool features, because for some wierd reason, the "Revert/warn" buttons are always greyed out. When a page loads, first the I.E. error thing flashes up, then the buttons flash from grey to black and back. I'm not sure how to correct this (have uninstalled and reinstalled a few times). _-M o P-_ 06:25, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I haven't seen you have tests, or else I wouldn't have bothered you. Either way, I managed to salvage the bulk of my black list through my vandalism log, and VandalProof works fine after re-installing. Good luck with your exam! -- Chodorkovskiy (talk) 06:42, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
To continue User_talk:AmiDaniel/Archive3#delete_please...
I didn't know about {{ db-author}}, I've always used {{ delete}}. I learn something new (almost) every day!
and now for something completely different...
I'm not doing much VandalProof stuff (since it keeps giving me script errors and not acknowledging my sign-in), but I've also had troubles with IE so I've deleted the IE .exe until I can resolve the issue (which isn't VandalProof) but I'll moderate the pages/requests for now and if there's anything you need, just let me know.
—
nath
a
nrd
o
tcom (
T •
C •
W)
07:17, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
Enjoy your break Daniel, I have just returned from one myself (in case you were wondering why I've been so quiet!) Will hold the reigns in your absense. Have a great one! - Gl e n T C (Stollery) 09:53, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
...just wondering, it sounds like you'll be facing either GCSEs or A-Levels, which one is it? Good luck! -- gtdp (T)/ (C) 19:19, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
...for adding that comment to my post on WP:AIV. My first couple of posts there, so I'm still getting the hang of it. Anyway did you see the other post I made to the page? What do you think of that? Should I have reported that or sorted it out myself?
Thanks
Srik
e
it(
talk ¦
✉)
21:06, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
I think we should remove the section "Mama's Boy" from the Elvis Presley page. There is no credible source to suggest that Presley had sex with his mother. No reputable biographer as ever made that statement and the user (Onefortyone) who is pushing the change has a history of citing to questionable sources, purposefully misinterpreting secondary sources, and overtly pushing his own agenda on the Presley page. I think we need significant evidence before we accuse someone, in an encyclopedia no less, of incest.
Lochdale —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lochdale ( talk • contribs) .
Actually it isn't well sourced. You have twisted sources in an effort to push your own agenda. For example, of the 2,000 plus books written about Presley, you managed to find two that even come close to supporting your position. You have what can only be described as an obsession with Presley's sex life. The quotes from Guralnik that Elvis was close with his mother do not say, suggest or even imply that Elvis was having an incestual relationship with her. To say that they do is an out and out fabrication. Moreover, Elvis' stepmother makes these claims in an unpublished manuscript that is so out of left field that noone will actually publish it. Lastly, Marcus does not claim that Presley had an incestous relationship with his mother. You either misrepresent sources or provide less than credible sources. The section should be removed. Lochdale
Comment' Could you please move this discussion to Talk:Elvis Presley? I'm having to archive my talk page on a biweekly basis as it is and would rather not constantly be prompted that I have new messages everytime you two respond to each other about a matter in which I'm not involved. Thanks. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 23:05, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
-- Av i ll ia ( RfC vs CVU) 22:40, 27 April 2006 (UTC)
If you wish, you can take me off, but I figured out what was doing it. I opened up the moderator tools thing to approve users; both times, a bunch of messages flashed up which I closed. I think thats it. So if I avoid using that, I should be good. P.S. I use Firefox, not IE. _-M o P-_ 01:30, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Would you accept a nomination, your additions have been amazing and the tools could surely help you out a bit. I noticed just today that you investigate AIV a lot, perhaps the shiny buttons would be of good use to you. Would you accept a nomination at this time? -- Tawker 05:01, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Well, VandalProof is in the same scope as Tawkerbot2, now if only I could fix this javascript error and get it to work :o -- Tawker 06:00, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi Daniel, just a wee heads up that the prod function needs to be changed to be {{subst:prod)} as it somes up with an error at mo. No biggie just FYI. God bless! - Gl e n T C (Stollery) 18:57, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for helping out on WP:AIV. The extra hand is most welcome and appreciated. ➨ ≡ Я Ξ DVΞRS ≡ 22:10, 28 April 2006 (UTC)
what did i do? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chelseachav ( talk • contribs) .
i didnt do anything wrong and you are giving me warnings. all i wrote was that he was a liverpool fc supporter and you have a go at me?????? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Chelseachav ( talk • contribs) .
Do you mind if I put old (fixed on current release) bugs on an archive. This will make the bug report page easier to read, and shorter. Thanks for making me a moderator, I will soon begin to update bugs, right now I think we have most of them on the startup page. Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 00:18, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
thanks for your kind words on my RFA AmiDaniel. Heh, I always laugh when I see your name, because I AM daniel. Anyway, good luck on your exams. I hope you do better than I did on mine =P ⇒ SWATJester Ready Aim Fire! 00:56, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
It is a true statement that the geographic south pole is the magnetic north pole. Look up magnetism on a physics website. I'm in AP physics. I know what I'm talking about. 24.163.169.250 05:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
-- Daveinaustin 05:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC)-- Daveinaustin 05:49, 29 April 2006 (UTC) I am going to bed now, but I will go through them line by line tomorrow, and I'll cite specific sources. For instance, it is very clear (established fact) that
I'll go through all the other edits, too. Whoever has been reverting my stuff on this, franken, and david remnick, is dead wrong. I have probably read more of all their stuff than virtually anyone on here. Really. I am not a crank.
Hi there. I'm a bit new to wikipedia so I was wondering if you could perhaps help me out. I'm sure that you've seen a few examples of what the user Daveinaustin has been doing as of late, and I'd like to have a RfC concerning this. Do you think you could help me out here? I'm a bit clueless as to how I should go about it.
Thanks!
Mister Mister 06:16, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I agree with your removing 206.207.158.202 from the list because it has not vandalized for awhile, but you were dead wrong in calling it a content dispute, see [11] and you might also want to see the rest of his contribs. Pegasus1138 Talk | Contribs | Email ---- 06:46, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Hello, I answered on my talk page. -- Mbimmler 08:11, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Cool that he's been added just makes me look stupid for all my recommendations to him just yesterday I guess - Gl e n T C (Stollery) 21:34, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
I just want to make sure that my approval of GeorgeMoney is OK with you, although this user has less then 250 article edits, his editing history seemed good, so I approved him. If you believe approving him was incorrect, remove him from the authorized users, and let me know. Thanks, Prodego talk 23:53, 29 April 2006 (UTC)
Now, pretend that's real and get studying Mr! :) - Gl e n T C (Stollery) 01:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Windows Registry Editor Version 5.00 [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\*\shell\gview] @="Open With Notepad" [HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\*\shell\gview\command] @="C:\\WINDOWS\\NOTEPAD.EXE %1"
That's actually {{ welcomeg}} (yes, the g signifies that it's the 7th of its kind; there are a lot of welcome templates), which happened to be someone else's personal welcome template and was moved to template space a bit ago. I do agree that a welcomebot would be great; the only downside is that it might somehow be slightly less meaningful than when I welcome people as fast as I can to annoy people in #vandalism-en-wp that have me on their blacklist. -- Rory096 03:15, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
I'm sorry for not providing an edit summary, but I only deleted those articles because there is no concrete proof of them. It was someone else who was vandalising the page. I was only fixing it. Please change it back to how it was after I fixed it. TOP 04:57, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Here is what you do,
Just use this script to keep you on your wikibreak. -- George Mon e y Talk Contribs 05:30, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
GAHH!!! The damn tool is too easy to hack. It uses local system time rather than Wiki time. Now my computer thinks it's May 21st and I'm back on Wikipedia. Okay, signing off for the very last time. AmiDaniel ( Talk) 05:59, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Hi, sorry about my early vandalism, i just wanted to add to the site to help it but an admin has deleted my Super Toad article. I got his username and here it is!! Adashiel!!! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jlhc ( talk • contribs) .
I think you may have erased Blnguyen's vote in updating the tally. See
[12]
--
Srik
e
it(
talk ¦
✉)
01:39, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
-- Av ill ia 03:03, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
I was just wondering if I could have my moderator priveledges back, pweeze. I promise to be good, and the main bug was with me accessing the user list; I think that if I only do it when there are users who want to be approved, nothing will happen. You don't have to give them back, of course, but I was just wondering. Thanks, _-M o P-_ 22:59, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
DON'T respond to this!!! Eagle ( talk) ( desk)
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 18 | 1 May 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
I see you are having a hard time... my suggestion is this... comprimise:-)
1) Leave new users, forums, abuse, and updating the welcome page to the "moderators".
2) respond to difficult bugs that require knowledge of the source code. (like the new user list blanking) ect. respond to other bugs... but if they are really easy leave them to me and other programmers. (I am competent in this area, as I just finished a C++ "pure" arbitrary number class, allows calculations with numbers as large as availible memery:-)---.
Please relize Wikipedia won't fall down just because you are not there!
I modified your edits on closing this AfD to what I think is a more reasonable organization, per my argument in the discussion and my edit comments (if we should mention one member of the Academy in its article, I don't think it should be one about whom we, so far, know too little to even have an article.) Hope that's OK with you. u p p l a n d 07:00, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I do not like Tom Cruise. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 64.231.241.72 ( talk • contribs) .
Hey Mister! LOG OFF NOW!! -- George Mon e y Talk Contribs 04:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
I have used this site a few times and i wish to inquire how you make sure your information is all completely accurate, due to the fact that anybody can access this website and add their own information, even if it is invalid. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 211.30.98.98 ( talk • contribs) .
I got your message regarding the program, and I totally understand. I will become more experienced in editing and catching vandals, then I will reapply. Thank you for informing me that I was rejected, though. That way, I didn't have to worry about not finding out and just getting dissed. XD
Quadrius —Preceding unsigned comment added by Quadrius ( talk • contribs) 19:10 3 May 2006 (UTC)
Dear AmiDaniel/Archive4,
Aren't you on a Wikibreak? Anyway, I was wondering something about VandalProof. I spend almost all my time nowadays reverting vandalism (especially on the Green Day and RuneScape articles). I applied for using your VP once before, and I was denied approval because I did not have 250 edits. Now I have 249. But I read closely at what the admin sent me in my "denial" notice and it says in these exact words "... must have at least 250 article edits...". Now does that mean 250 edits in the article namespace or 250 edits anywhere? I was just wondering because I really want to use vandalproof. Really it looks like a great tool. Right now, I go and revert vandalism, then by the time I do that and go leave the user a warning message on his talk page, a few other people did more vandalism, which I once again must revert, warn the vandals, and so on. Cheers! Wikipeedio 23:39, 4 May 2006 (UTC)
For the Anti V barnstar. My vandal "slapping" has greatly improved since I got VandalProof. As a result, my User page is now a target of revenge. So I know I'm doing something right! Cheers and take care! Anger22 09:44, 5 May 2006 (UTC)
I wish to give u a app. for co-owner of Cody Inc.(last one just quit becuase i lowered his pay from $200 an hour to $94 a hour lol)(U WONT GET PAID) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Codyman3 ( talk • contribs) .
MWHAHAHA I OWN U MWAHAHAHAHA Just Kidding i thought was funny —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Codyman3 ( talk • contribs) .
Stop editing or I'll attack! Get back to work. :D —
nathanrd
o
tco
m (Got something to say?
Say it.)
03:16, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Hello AmiDaniel!
The articles Church in india and True Jesus Church india (which was created User:True jesus, who is a vandal) should be deleted because the original article already existed with the True Jesus Church in India. Jose77 21:23, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
uh... what the title says. You have better things to do!! Eagle ( talk) ( desk) 23:45, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
Its the first time I ever used the Notify AIV function and I obviously messed it up as it added you instead of the IP address (you actually warned of the same IP anyway) - I quickly removed but not a good look. Oops my bad, sorry! - Gl e n T C (Stollery) 00:08, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
I have begun to get rid of old bugs on the bug report page, I am not removing anything that may be of help to other users I put all bug reports that I deleted in an archive called User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs/Version 1.1.0 and older fixes. It is linked to at the top of the Bug report page.
P.S. You dont need to respond unless you have suggestions for me, else your silence is all I need. Eagle talk 02:38, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Comply with what your talk page says, get off and study!!!! Have you willpower? Eagle talk 03:19, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Geeze. 3 more contribs after this...
Can you stop... plus why is your monobook blocked, I was going to impose you wikibreak on you!!!! by the wikibreak enforcer... Its a shame that you ask us to block you, but then give us no means to do so... Eagle talk 03:30, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Though I thought I would note that you have now exceeded 500 edits while on "wikibreak" and that is over less than 10 days, May I ask what kind of break is that??? Eagle talk 03:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
03:53, 7 May 2006 (hist) (diff) m User talk:AmiDaniel (→What am I to do - Such a heavy burden to be the one...)
He responded on the bug report pages... I found it because I have been doing some work there, removing old bugs
User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs#'Your log-in request failed' (back to square one)... Eagle talk 04:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Note the ones I had in green text, that signals that the info is useful to others and needs to be on 1) the welcome page or 2) elsewhere. Eagle talk 04:31, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
We will figure that out later, once you decide, let me know, and I will automatically replace the whole page, by bot user:Gnome (Bot), so it is not a big deal, as that can be done by automation. Eagle talk 05:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
AmiDaniel (
Talk)
04:42, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
LOL, I would leave the red fonts though, I find them very attention getting for you, and perhaps more important, others who are putting bugs of there own in. Eagle talk
Lol, I am working on the lightning bolt now... I am going to have to look over the green check marks... remember, If they are fixed, I am going archive them. If you noticed I did not archive any green titles, that is because they are a "user help" thing, Perhaps we need to make a page called trouble shooting??? Eagle talk 04:46, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
I will be glad to write the FAQ, this is my thing:-) I will get to it in about 15 min... and I can tell pretty well what has been fixed, my suggestion to you is to look at some of those "red" flags, as some are really old, and you have not replyed. Eagle talk 04:52, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
lol... we really should not be editconflicting... because soooomebody is not even supposed to be here...
that aside, I just figured out your last revert, I will have to sort this out agian, please give me 5 minutes without you editing on the bug fix page... Eagle talk 05:07, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Please tell me what the four symbols are for....
04:58, 7 May 2006 (hist) (diff) User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs (New format ... hopefully without an edit conflict ... goddammit, sorry whoever's edits I just removed!) (top)
Funny, you could not tell it was me... who else would it be?? Eagle talk 05:04, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Change the definition of check mark to potentally usefull to other users.... As under the current definition they all will go to archive:-) Eagle talk 05:16, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
when is which used, unresolved and uhhh not fixed are one and the same. Eagle talk 05:40, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Make note of it in the conversation... remember I or others can't read inbetween the lines! Eagle talk 05:57, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Go and look please, Mod functions not recognizing my update to main program page(you know which one). Eagle talk 08:10, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
See if you can recognize my removal of the test edit. Eagle talk 08:37, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
I did, but it won't pick it up... Eagle talk 08:44, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Have fun with it... By the way I successfully added a user... go figure, look it up in my contribs if you wish. And I need to sign Eagle talk 08:53, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Hey try this, put me in with out the underscore, I will relog in if I must. Eagle talk 08:59, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
HaHa edit conflict... I have not had one of those yet!!! honestly, not today
any way what I meant was reset the mods with my username with out an underscore
let me try it agian....
have a look
nope Eagle talk 09:18, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
oh and if you did not realize I ADDED a user with no problems at all, and my name states moderator as well. Any way, good night Eagle talk 09:22, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Oh and um, with all of those really nice features and fixes, such as no more popups, java, ect. Why not realease it now... you can always put out new revisions, but what you have is some MAJOR changes and would be very welcome to all. Eagle talk 09:11, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
|
|
One thing I noticed is that when VandalProof loads the users for approval, if the user messed up the formatting, the program goofs. Here is a possible solution using regexes, (Machine generated VB code, best I can do:-)
Public Dim Userfication as Regex = New Regex( _ "({{user2.*?}})", _ RegexOptions.IgnoreCase _ Or RegexOptions.CultureInvariant _ Or RegexOptions.IgnorePatternWhitespace _ Or RegexOptions.Compiled _ )
This looks for {{user2|<the user's name>}} if it is in the user2 template the code will pick it up. Hope this helps.
Eagle
talk
22:03, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about that, that was not intentional... (perhaps payback for your edit conflicts, oh enjoy comming up with other reasons:-) Eagle talk 00:04, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Look at my reply to you at Wikipedia:Signature Poll/GeorgeMoney. GeorgeMoney ( talk · contribs) 02:11, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Actually, that's the IP range used by the banned user Amorrow. It may be a little too broad to rangeblock. -- Curps 07:23, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
I am not vandalising, an opposing fan destroyed our page and I am removing all the stupid flags and words he used.
Thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Airy ( talk • contribs) .
I noticed an attack on all cyprus soccer websites and I hope so that will not last long.
So I wanted to ask you if you thought I was experienced enough to use vandalproof. Other users are telling me that I am a little underexperienced, but I have over 250 edits. Just wanted to know what you thought. By the way, Ive been looking thru your talk page and see that you have a lot of exams and stuff. Are you in college or high school? Just curious. Wikipeedio 22:22, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
thanks AmiDaniel for you comment on my rfa, after the concerns you raised i thought that it might bea good idea to answer them directly so that other pepole could also benifit from them, anyway thanks for the time you took to respond to my rfa, happy editing Benon 22:56, 8 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi Ami,
Would it be possible to remove my messages on your page. This page came up on the google search engine near my personal website. Did not realise this was a blogg. Can you please help with some other stuff that has cropped up online.
Thanks.
<name removed> 00:52, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
you r mean —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.237.144.169 ( talk • contribs) .
![]() |
---|
| ||
Volume 2, Issue 19 | 8 May 2006 | |
|
| |
Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | |
|
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.
I redirected CAD to CAD (disambiguation), but it was immediately reverted by User:ILovePlankton using VandalProof. That page was simply a less-comprehensive version of the latter page, and the redirection was totally in keeping with the sentiments expressed on its talk page. ILovePlankton should not be so trigger-happy. 86.40.156.73 19:50, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
As above, I'm shocked to see that you are watching my page! But thankyou, as I was not on last night... hence the lack of edit conflicts...I do do that to you rather often... that is weird:-). Please feel free to respond on my talk page anytime that you desire... I don't care, as long as the user gets the advice they need!!! Eagle talk 00:38, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about the evil thing on my userpage. I'll try to make it look more like a practical joke (link doesn't redirect to your talkpage)
-- Primat e #101 01:55, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Thanks Ami for instructing me, I am new to the Wiki ways and practices. By the way, what's your opinion in the "RAD Data Communications" deletion issue? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by John hyams ( talk • contribs) .
Glad you like it :) The things you mentioned were bothering me too. — kooo 06:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)
Are you a control freak? Do I need to get a permission from you to create an accout on wikipedia? What about your username? What if I say your user name is highly highly inappropriate? If an article with title "tru jesus church" can be very appropriate, how come a user name "true jesus" is highly inappropriate? BTW, I don't give a shit to threat of blocking my user name. I knew 1000 ways to get around it. I have only edited a crap article "true jesus church". User Jose77 and a couple others were keep begging for the article translation. They bug me and my friends too. What do you I should do such article? Translate it saying "True jesus church" is the only true church and others are crap? Should I say that if you go to true jesus church, you can fly in the air. There is no necessity of car, bus, plane or anything.. Is that what you think? Does such article deserve any place in wikipedia. Did you do anything to stop it? I am not even warning you. Lets see if you keep, or delete my comment.
-- True jesus 18:05, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
I know there are only four right now, but I choose to go ahead and create an archive. User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Abuse/May-June2006.
I set the policy for this as: Reports in which over 10 (ten) days have passed since the last post may be placed into archive.
I thought that this is most appropriate, as if nobody posts after 10 days, the issue is over. Eagle talk 20:13, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
Your AN/I note raises, IMHO, some interesting questions apropos of this user. I certainly don't think his user name to be particularly disruptive (I am generally of the view that all user names should be permitted, inasmuch as I cannot imagine that valuable contributors would ever allow their imputing impropriety to a user name to disrupt the collaborative editing process, if only because I would necessarily infer intellectual infirmity from one's inability to cope with a user name he/she finds offensive, but I know that my beliefs don't command community support), even as a different user name might lend itself to better community interaction. I think the user certainly has been altogether trollish in his/her contributions, and I think a short block is likely in order. Because the user is relatively new, he/she may change his/her ways (as you well note on the user's talk page) and become a good editor; the fact of the user's user name and the singularity of his/her contributions, though, suggest an intent to troll/disrupt and lead one to fear that good faith is not present. You might be able to find support for an "exhausting the community's patience" indef block, but I think perhaps a 24-hr block might be in order, after which perhaps an RfC would be in order should disruption continue (I suppose one only needs to go that route, though, if the community doesn't think an indef block to be appropriate; here, since the user has shown no intention or capability to contribute productively, the community might quickly find its patience exhausted). Joe 21:58, 11 May 2006 (UTC)
for having an open mind. TheJ abb erw ʘck 06:32, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi,
I've been doing a lot of RC patrolling recently on Wikipedia and see a lot of people use your VandalProof application- when I looked into it, this page sent me here to request it!
Hope your Wikibreak was relaxing,
Kind regards,
EvocativeIntrigue 16:48, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Hi, I am Eagle talk, I am a fellow moderator on VP. Currently the program is not recognizing my user name as a moderator. As such the program does not always recognize some of the changes I make to the VP official welcom page. (you know what I am talking about). This problem has been documented on User talk:AmiDaniel/VP/Bugs#Moderator update is not working. I request a "Null" edit to that page, The reason is a user I added is having problems logging in.
No longer needed, I posted this becuase I figured you would be on, agianst your wikibreak:-( Eagle talk 22:25, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
fisrt off... back to the usual. (you getting an edit conflict:-)
Second, thank you for confirming that, I suspected that you did that on purpose:-) No matter what, you have connect to the internet with an open browser, and you would rather your program work on connecting to the internet and checking the approved list, rather than generating some fancy graphic:-). I have done this also for similar reasons on programs of my own:-).