You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Osteopathic medicine in the United States. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
Verbal
chat
17:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
|
- Write out both the full version and the abbreviation at first occurrence
- When introducing a new name in an article, it is good practice to use the full name on its first occurrence, followed by the abbreviated form in parentheses. For example, The New Democratic Party (NDP) won the 1990 Ontario election with a significant majority (first mention of New Democratic Party in the article), and The NDP quickly became unpopular with the voters (subsequent mention).
- Initial capitals are not used in the full name of an item just because capitals are used in the abbreviation.
Incorrect (not a name): We used Digital Scanning (DS) technology Correct: We used digital scanning (DS) technology Correct (name): produced by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
- If the full term is already in parentheses, use a comma and or to indicate the abbreviation; for example, They first debated the issue in 1992 (at a convention of the New Democratic Party, or NDP).
- Plural and possessive forms
- Acronyms and initialisms are pluralized by adding -s or -es as with any other nouns (They produced three CD-ROMs in the first year; The laptops were produced with three different BIOSes in 2006). As with other nouns, no apostrophe is used unless the form is a possessive.
- Periods (full stops) and spaces
- Acronyms and initialisms are generally not separated by full stops (periods) or blank spaces (GNP, NORAD, OBE, GmbH); many periods and spaces that were traditionally required have now dropped out of usage (PhD is preferred over Ph.D. and Ph. D.). Periods are not used in units of measurement (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) for more information).
- Truncated (Hon. for Honorable), compressed (cmte. for committee) and contracted (Dr. for Doctor) abbreviations may or may not be closed with a period; a consistent style should be maintained within an article. A period is more usual in American usage (Dr. Smith of 42 St. Joseph St.); no period is commonly preferred in British and other usage (Dr Smith of 42 St Joseph St, although one or other "St" might take a period, in such a case). Some British and other authorities prefer to drop the period from truncated and compressed abbreviations generally (XYZ Corp, ABC Ltd), a practice favored in science writing. Regardless of punctuation, such abbreviations are spaced if multi-word (op. cit. or op cit, not op.cit. or opcit).
- US and U.S.
- In American English, U.S. is the standard abbreviation for United States; US is becoming more common and is standard in other national forms of English. In longer abbreviations incorporating the country's initials (USN, USAF), periods are not used. When the United States is mentioned along with one or more other countries in the same sentence, U.S. or US can be too informal, and many editors avoid it especially at first mention of the country (France and the United States, not France and the U.S.). In a given article, if the abbreviated form of the United States appears predominantly alongside other abbreviated country names, for consistency it is preferable to avoid periods throughout; never add periods to the other abbreviations (the US, the UK and the PRC, not the U.S., the U.K. and the P.R.C.). The spaced U. S. is never used, nor is the archaic U.S. of A., except in quoted materials. U.S.A. and USA are not used unless quoted or as part of a proper name (Team USA).
- Do not use unwarranted abbreviations
- The use of abbreviations should be avoided when they would be confusing to the reader, interrupt the flow, or appear informal or lazy. For example, approx. for approximate or approximately should generally not be used, although it may be useful for reducing the width of an infobox or a table of data, or in a technical passage in which the term occurs many times.
- See also Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) for when to abbreviate units of measurement.
- Do not invent abbreviations or acronyms
- Generally avoid the making up of new abbreviations, especially acronyms. For example, while it is reasonable to provide World Union of Billiards as a translation of Union Mondiale de Billard, the former is not the organization's name, and it does not use the acronym or initialism WUB; when referring to it in short form, use the official abbreviation UMB. In a wide table of international economic data, it might be desirable to abbreviate a United States gross national product heading; this might be done with the widely recognized initialisms US and GNP spaced together, with a link to appropriate articles, if it is not already explained: US GNP, rather than the made-up initialism USGNP.
- HTML elements
-
The software that Wikipedia runs on does not support
HTML abbreviation elements (
<acronym>or<abbr>); therefore, these tags are not inserted into the source (see Mediazilla:671). Verbal chat 18:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Greetings! I am posting this as this user has revealed herself to be a Media Relations Specialist, a paid employee of the American Osteopathic Association. The following guildlines will help to guide you about which articles you may wish to excercise caution with when editing. 69.27.229.11 ( talk) 23:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
Hi AmericanOsteopathic,
Thanks for contacting me. I'm delighted you have an interest in Wikipedia.
You ask some great questions. I'll do the best I can to answer them.
As you may know, Wikipedia is the on-line encyclopedia that "anyone can edit." Anyone is allowed to contribute to Wikipedia, at any time.
You'll notice I said anyone, and not any "group."
Your attempt to edit a page discussing an organization or group of which you are a paid employee is frowned upon by Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy.
You can read about Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest Policy here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:COI
If you attempt to edit the article about Osteopathic medicine in the future, you might be banned from Wikipedia. I say might, because there is still a reasonable way for you to edit, even with your COI.
#1 Establish yourself as a reputable editor who is interested in making contributions to Wikipedia, outside of the area of Osteopathic medicine. Wikipedia frowns on edits done as part of employment. Wikipedians are volunteers. If you show you are legitimately interested in being an editor, outside of your position of media relations specialist, you may learn a lot about how Wikipedia works, and also be better positioned to make effective, meaningful contributions to Wikipedia. (Plus its really fun!)
#2 The best place to discuss article's content is not in private emails between editors. Discussions about article's content are best voiced on that article's talk page. The talk page for Osteopathic medicine in the United States is here:
#3 You (as a user) also have a talk page. It is located here:
#4 The cornerstone prinicples of the content on Wikipedia are "notability," "reliability" and "neutral point of view." Understanding these principles, specifically in the context of Wikipedia, is critical to being a member of the Wikipedia community. Here's links to the guildlines discussing these three concepts.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RS
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:N
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV
I have posted this information on your talk page, as well.
Let's continue our dicussion there! I'll meet you there. I'd love to help you in any way I can.
Sincerely,
Bryan Hopping T 23:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to explain Wikipedia guidelines to me. In the future, I will be sure to limit any editing I do on the site to updating factual and statistical information, such as updating statistics about the profession.-- Americanosteopathic ( talk) 16:20, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
American Osteopathic Association may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {{organization
- leadership/Pages/aoa-executive-director-bio.aspx] | title=Executive Director: Adrienne White-Faines]] </ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine page, your edit caused a broken reference name ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Osteopathic medicine in the United States. Note that the
three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the
three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be
blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a
consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue
dispute resolution.
Verbal
chat
17:58, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
|
- Write out both the full version and the abbreviation at first occurrence
- When introducing a new name in an article, it is good practice to use the full name on its first occurrence, followed by the abbreviated form in parentheses. For example, The New Democratic Party (NDP) won the 1990 Ontario election with a significant majority (first mention of New Democratic Party in the article), and The NDP quickly became unpopular with the voters (subsequent mention).
- Initial capitals are not used in the full name of an item just because capitals are used in the abbreviation.
Incorrect (not a name): We used Digital Scanning (DS) technology Correct: We used digital scanning (DS) technology Correct (name): produced by the British Broadcasting Corporation (BBC)
- If the full term is already in parentheses, use a comma and or to indicate the abbreviation; for example, They first debated the issue in 1992 (at a convention of the New Democratic Party, or NDP).
- Plural and possessive forms
- Acronyms and initialisms are pluralized by adding -s or -es as with any other nouns (They produced three CD-ROMs in the first year; The laptops were produced with three different BIOSes in 2006). As with other nouns, no apostrophe is used unless the form is a possessive.
- Periods (full stops) and spaces
- Acronyms and initialisms are generally not separated by full stops (periods) or blank spaces (GNP, NORAD, OBE, GmbH); many periods and spaces that were traditionally required have now dropped out of usage (PhD is preferred over Ph.D. and Ph. D.). Periods are not used in units of measurement (see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) for more information).
- Truncated (Hon. for Honorable), compressed (cmte. for committee) and contracted (Dr. for Doctor) abbreviations may or may not be closed with a period; a consistent style should be maintained within an article. A period is more usual in American usage (Dr. Smith of 42 St. Joseph St.); no period is commonly preferred in British and other usage (Dr Smith of 42 St Joseph St, although one or other "St" might take a period, in such a case). Some British and other authorities prefer to drop the period from truncated and compressed abbreviations generally (XYZ Corp, ABC Ltd), a practice favored in science writing. Regardless of punctuation, such abbreviations are spaced if multi-word (op. cit. or op cit, not op.cit. or opcit).
- US and U.S.
- In American English, U.S. is the standard abbreviation for United States; US is becoming more common and is standard in other national forms of English. In longer abbreviations incorporating the country's initials (USN, USAF), periods are not used. When the United States is mentioned along with one or more other countries in the same sentence, U.S. or US can be too informal, and many editors avoid it especially at first mention of the country (France and the United States, not France and the U.S.). In a given article, if the abbreviated form of the United States appears predominantly alongside other abbreviated country names, for consistency it is preferable to avoid periods throughout; never add periods to the other abbreviations (the US, the UK and the PRC, not the U.S., the U.K. and the P.R.C.). The spaced U. S. is never used, nor is the archaic U.S. of A., except in quoted materials. U.S.A. and USA are not used unless quoted or as part of a proper name (Team USA).
- Do not use unwarranted abbreviations
- The use of abbreviations should be avoided when they would be confusing to the reader, interrupt the flow, or appear informal or lazy. For example, approx. for approximate or approximately should generally not be used, although it may be useful for reducing the width of an infobox or a table of data, or in a technical passage in which the term occurs many times.
- See also Wikipedia:Manual of Style (dates and numbers) for when to abbreviate units of measurement.
- Do not invent abbreviations or acronyms
- Generally avoid the making up of new abbreviations, especially acronyms. For example, while it is reasonable to provide World Union of Billiards as a translation of Union Mondiale de Billard, the former is not the organization's name, and it does not use the acronym or initialism WUB; when referring to it in short form, use the official abbreviation UMB. In a wide table of international economic data, it might be desirable to abbreviate a United States gross national product heading; this might be done with the widely recognized initialisms US and GNP spaced together, with a link to appropriate articles, if it is not already explained: US GNP, rather than the made-up initialism USGNP.
- HTML elements
-
The software that Wikipedia runs on does not support
HTML abbreviation elements (
<acronym>or<abbr>); therefore, these tags are not inserted into the source (see Mediazilla:671). Verbal chat 18:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Greetings! I am posting this as this user has revealed herself to be a Media Relations Specialist, a paid employee of the American Osteopathic Association. The following guildlines will help to guide you about which articles you may wish to excercise caution with when editing. 69.27.229.11 ( talk) 23:20, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a
conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's
neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
Hi AmericanOsteopathic,
Thanks for contacting me. I'm delighted you have an interest in Wikipedia.
You ask some great questions. I'll do the best I can to answer them.
As you may know, Wikipedia is the on-line encyclopedia that "anyone can edit." Anyone is allowed to contribute to Wikipedia, at any time.
You'll notice I said anyone, and not any "group."
Your attempt to edit a page discussing an organization or group of which you are a paid employee is frowned upon by Wikipedia's conflict of interest policy.
You can read about Wikipedia's Conflict of Interest Policy here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:COI
If you attempt to edit the article about Osteopathic medicine in the future, you might be banned from Wikipedia. I say might, because there is still a reasonable way for you to edit, even with your COI.
#1 Establish yourself as a reputable editor who is interested in making contributions to Wikipedia, outside of the area of Osteopathic medicine. Wikipedia frowns on edits done as part of employment. Wikipedians are volunteers. If you show you are legitimately interested in being an editor, outside of your position of media relations specialist, you may learn a lot about how Wikipedia works, and also be better positioned to make effective, meaningful contributions to Wikipedia. (Plus its really fun!)
#2 The best place to discuss article's content is not in private emails between editors. Discussions about article's content are best voiced on that article's talk page. The talk page for Osteopathic medicine in the United States is here:
#3 You (as a user) also have a talk page. It is located here:
#4 The cornerstone prinicples of the content on Wikipedia are "notability," "reliability" and "neutral point of view." Understanding these principles, specifically in the context of Wikipedia, is critical to being a member of the Wikipedia community. Here's links to the guildlines discussing these three concepts.
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:RS
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:N
- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NPOV
I have posted this information on your talk page, as well.
Let's continue our dicussion there! I'll meet you there. I'd love to help you in any way I can.
Sincerely,
Bryan Hopping T 23:50, 10 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for taking the time to explain Wikipedia guidelines to me. In the future, I will be sure to limit any editing I do on the site to updating factual and statistical information, such as updating statistics about the profession.-- Americanosteopathic ( talk) 16:20, 18 December 2009 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
American Osteopathic Association may have broken the
syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s and 2 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- {{organization
- leadership/Pages/aoa-executive-director-bio.aspx] | title=Executive Director: Adrienne White-Faines]] </ref>
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 21:51, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine page, your edit caused a broken reference name ( help). ( Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot ( talk) 00:20, 27 January 2016 (UTC)