![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
It finally got renewed for a 2nd season. [1] — YoungForever (talk) 18:47, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
At least it's better late than never getting renew as we often see a lot of TV series getting cancel just after one season regardless of TV series doing well. — YoungForever (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
This is CriticismEdits, the real one. I got locked out of my account by someone, don’t know who it is. So if you find edits made by me on your followed by you, it is made by CriticismEdits, just a different username. RareButterflyDoors ( talk) 07:57, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Related discussion: The Lodge (TV series) from January 2019
Why do you feel that the short description template is unnecessary on The Lodge article? When you search for The Lodge, the short description says "british", rather than "British". Poor capitalisation. It feels like you’re sacrificing good grammar purely because you dislike my editing style. Change it yourself if need be. – Joesimnett ( talk) 09:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
"Eventually all articles should have a short description, either directly by using this template, in which case the short description will be unique to the article, or transcluded in another template...". Now, what I'm unclear on is where {{ Infobox television}} does the 'short description' automatically or not. Assuming it doesn't, it looks like these {{ Short description}} tags shouldn't be removed. Readers don't see them anyway, so it's not a big deal... FWIW. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 17:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
We have a page move edit-warer at this article, who is not following WP:BRD, and did not take this to WP:RM as I suggested. This is a controversial move, and should be reverted, so I'd appreciate some help here. Pinging Geraldo Perez and MPFitz1968 as well. Thanks -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 15:01, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments at Justthefacts9 ( talk · contribs)'s TP. He's a tough customer regarding edit summaries, with about 89.5% with no summary. Not the first time he's been advised about this, either; see this comment of mine on his TP, blanked within a day with no response. At least your post lasted slightly longer than mine before he wiped it; oh well. He's a bit "my way or the highway", and exhibits some ownership behavior on some articles as well, and can get bent out of shape if challenged on any of them, so keep an eye out. Happy editing! Mathglot ( talk) 09:52, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Have some WP:DE from some IPs at this article – need assistance. Thanks. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 05:07, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Draft:High School Musical: The Musical may be calling your name. See: High School Musical (franchise)#High School Musical: The Musical. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 21:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Do you have a way to check the end credits, to check this edit? -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 20:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
But I thought let's find out what user/admin they are talking about, which might help narrow the boomerang investigation for a reviewing admin... Leviv ich 06:15, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
I'm not going to your close, but the purpose of the discussion wasn't to get BMK sanctioned; if it was, I would've taken it to WP:ANEW. Also, BMK's block was over a dispute at an unrealted article. Perhaps I could've communicated more clearly, but I honestly was trying to find out the limits of WP:IAR, as I run into this sort of thing surprisingly frequently (and not just with BMK). Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 23:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Has anybody been able to find an actual Nickelodeon press release that supports this? -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 20:53, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Back to 'rowspan' violating WP:ACCESS use at Sabrina Carpenter. Will likely need to keep more eyes on this now, as this editor has shown they will not stop, and will brazenly ignore consensus on the issue as well. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
It finally got renewed for a 2nd season. [1] — YoungForever (talk) 18:47, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
At least it's better late than never getting renew as we often see a lot of TV series getting cancel just after one season regardless of TV series doing well. — YoungForever (talk) 05:40, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
This is CriticismEdits, the real one. I got locked out of my account by someone, don’t know who it is. So if you find edits made by me on your followed by you, it is made by CriticismEdits, just a different username. RareButterflyDoors ( talk) 07:57, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Related discussion: The Lodge (TV series) from January 2019
Why do you feel that the short description template is unnecessary on The Lodge article? When you search for The Lodge, the short description says "british", rather than "British". Poor capitalisation. It feels like you’re sacrificing good grammar purely because you dislike my editing style. Change it yourself if need be. – Joesimnett ( talk) 09:26, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
"Eventually all articles should have a short description, either directly by using this template, in which case the short description will be unique to the article, or transcluded in another template...". Now, what I'm unclear on is where {{ Infobox television}} does the 'short description' automatically or not. Assuming it doesn't, it looks like these {{ Short description}} tags shouldn't be removed. Readers don't see them anyway, so it's not a big deal... FWIW. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 17:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
We have a page move edit-warer at this article, who is not following WP:BRD, and did not take this to WP:RM as I suggested. This is a controversial move, and should be reverted, so I'd appreciate some help here. Pinging Geraldo Perez and MPFitz1968 as well. Thanks -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 15:01, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for your comments at Justthefacts9 ( talk · contribs)'s TP. He's a tough customer regarding edit summaries, with about 89.5% with no summary. Not the first time he's been advised about this, either; see this comment of mine on his TP, blanked within a day with no response. At least your post lasted slightly longer than mine before he wiped it; oh well. He's a bit "my way or the highway", and exhibits some ownership behavior on some articles as well, and can get bent out of shape if challenged on any of them, so keep an eye out. Happy editing! Mathglot ( talk) 09:52, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Have some WP:DE from some IPs at this article – need assistance. Thanks. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 05:07, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Draft:High School Musical: The Musical may be calling your name. See: High School Musical (franchise)#High School Musical: The Musical. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 21:01, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Do you have a way to check the end credits, to check this edit? -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 20:34, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
But I thought let's find out what user/admin they are talking about, which might help narrow the boomerang investigation for a reviewing admin... Leviv ich 06:15, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
I'm not going to your close, but the purpose of the discussion wasn't to get BMK sanctioned; if it was, I would've taken it to WP:ANEW. Also, BMK's block was over a dispute at an unrealted article. Perhaps I could've communicated more clearly, but I honestly was trying to find out the limits of WP:IAR, as I run into this sort of thing surprisingly frequently (and not just with BMK). Curly "JFC" Turkey 🍁 ¡gobble! 23:16, 20 February 2019 (UTC)
Has anybody been able to find an actual Nickelodeon press release that supports this? -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 20:53, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Back to 'rowspan' violating WP:ACCESS use at Sabrina Carpenter. Will likely need to keep more eyes on this now, as this editor has shown they will not stop, and will brazenly ignore consensus on the issue as well. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:41, 28 February 2019 (UTC)