![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please don't accuse users of being socks without explanation! It isn't very nice. -- Rockstone talk to me! 21:06, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
22:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Amaury/2019 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
While I know I've been blocked before, that was way back in 2010, so I essentially have a clean record—or had until this recent block. Given that, while I have absolutely no problem with the administrator themselves, I believe this was a bad block, and it should not have been made. There were no official warnings or attempts to discuss from an administrator on either of the reasons given for the block—there weren't even any warnings in general, just a notice that I had a report filed against me at ANI—and given the time yesterday between my last related edit and the block—1:13 PM and 3:53 PM (PT), respectively—I feel that this block, regardless, is punitive, not preventative. Once the other editor started a talk page discussion on Descendants, I was discussing the issue. From what I've seen in the past, almost all administrators would be happy with that and just give editors warnings. Given my good-standing here, I just feel that a block is too extreme, when I could have just gotten a stern warning. Amaury • 15:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Bbb23 ( talk) 15:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BTW, Amaury, I'm starting to believe that you are correct that 2600:1700:B7A1:9A30:A4EE:4873:FD0E:E744 is a sock, per the DUCK test. However, you went about dealing with him in the wrong manner. p b p 20:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Amaury! I was quite bummed to read the ANI discussion and the block that your actions got you tangled into. I know you to be a very experienced and knowledgeable editor, and I know that this bump in the road is something you'll learn and move on from. I just wanted to send you a message to welcome you back, to encourage you to take what happened, self-reflect on ways that you can avoid this pitfall in the future, and apply it moving forward. I understand how easy it is to get caught up in the "sock puppet alert" mentality and how it can lead one to make assumptions as soon as you see something. I find myself doing it once in awhile, too... I'm sending you a message of understanding, compassion, and encouragement. If you need someone to talk to, please know that my user talk page is always open to you, and you're welcome there any time you'd like. Keep up the excellent work, take what happened as a learning opportunity, and move forward. We can do nothing about the past, but we can look forward and focus on the future. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 04:14, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Now that the flick has aired, the next order of business here, aside from a 'Plot' section, is to add a 'Casting' section, and move of all of the casting sources from the 'Cast' section to the new 'Casting' section. Just sayin'... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 07:08, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Except I think I saw a promo today that might have had Stony Blyden. I only saw the promo once, so I can't be sure... But I think it showed an older Stony Blyden. But no sign of the other two yet (and I find that really odd in Maemae Renfrow's case, as she shows no work on IMDb since S2...). Still, in a case where people only seem to be credited for the episodes they appear in, I'm not sure we need to record "absences" in this situation anyway. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
@ IJBall: The strange thing here is that unlike the second season, the new characters are appearing in the opening sequence in episodes before their official debut. @ Geraldo Perez: How do we handle the problem here regarding Jake? See the opening sequence here, which clearly shows Jake; however, the problem, as IJBall stated above, is that his actor, Wilson Radjou-Pujalte, is not credited as starring, but rather as co-starring in the end credits, this series' term for guest stars. How do we handle this? We have conflicting info, with actor credits saying guest star/recurring for Wilson Radjou-Pujalte, but the character he portrays, Jake, appearing in the opening sequence linked earlier, meaning main character. Amaury • 04:10, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
@ IJBall: You're already watching this, obviously, but I will need extra attention there. @ Geraldo Perez and MPFitz1968: I'm going to need more eyes at the article. (And, even though there's currently no active disruption there, List of Hunter Street episodes probably wouldn't hurt, either.) IPs repeatedly removing the fact that Jake is recurring in the third season. Amaury • 16:53, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
It's been over a year since the last new episode of this one aired, so I've "called it", and put the end dates in. I'll leave it to you to update the lede at your leisure as you see fit... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 01:04, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
I'll let you appraise the correctness of
this edit...
--
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
17:28, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Futon Critic recently updated with the August premieres for RMP. How does it work regarding 114? Up until now, none of the episodes have been separated into "1##A"/"1##B" for the series. Do they get added to the table separately like it is on Futon Critic in the A and B, or just put them in as one under "114" and give the airdate of the first (August 21) and maybe add a note saying the second part premiered on August 22? I haven't had this sort of scenario with a show until now. Magitroopa ( talk) 01:44, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Need more eyes here – IP repeatedly adding unsourced content about her participation the forthcoming season of Fuller House (which won't be released until "late 2019"), violating WP:CRYSTAL and WP:V. Pinging Geraldo Perez as well. If it happens a couple of more times, semiprotection may be required. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:56, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, the listings on this page are a bit out of wack as of right now- production codes from Futon Critic are being used wrong (duplicate production codes are being used instead of combining or using "###A"/"###B" when necessary), since episodes are not being listed together, duplicate sources from Showbuzz Daily are being used throughout (viewership for the two 102's, the two 103's, and many more in the table), episodes are currently listed in production order instead of original broadcast order, as well as even listing the season number of episodes when there's only one season. That being said, I would love to clean this up. Only problem is, it is an Italian series (country of origin of series is Italy) being aired on Nickelodeon in the US. I have no clue if because origin country is not US that some rules don't apply, but thought I would give it a go anyways. Would love for you to check my sandbox for it to see if it is fine before editing up the main page already on Wikipedia. If the sandbox entry is good, I assume I can just copy/paste that and replace the current table in the main article? I think you're the right person to ask about this, but if I need to discuss/ask this somewhere else first, would love to be directed to the right place regarding this. Thanks in advance. Magitroopa ( talk) 06:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Please read the policy at WP:BRD-NOT carefully. WP:BRDREVERT says, "If you revert twice, then you are no longer following the BRD cycle: If your reversion is reverted, then there may be a good reason for it. Go to the talk page to learn why you were reverted." Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 08:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
As you are familiar with guest vs recurring. — YoungForever (talk) 05:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
This could arguably be moved into Mainspace now (it technically meets WP:NFF, as filming has been completed, even if its lack of an "more exact" premiere date leaves it a little short on WP:TVSHOW...). But if you want to wait for a more specific release date, I would move it immediately upon that happening... However, in this case, I think we may need Admin help, or at least advice – currently, Zombies 2 is a redirect to Zombi 2. I'd argue that this deserves the Zombies 2 base title (we can always include a hatnote to Zombi 2...), but that's going to mean overwriting the current redirect, and even I as a page mover won't be able to do that. So you're going to need to think about which Admin you want to contact when you're ready to, and you'll need to explain all of this to them when you make the request. Just thinking ahead... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk)
The problem with the template is that the talk page hasn’t been touched in years and not many people would know how to view a template's talk page. Just saying, would you classify Pup Academy as acquired or original? Disney didn’t produce the series. Luigitehplumber ( talk) 22:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
I just saw a histmerge tag by IJBall that you already had a userspace draft for this. When the premiere date was announced and I couldn't find it in the main draftspace, I went ahead to create one. I should have probably checked with you guys first to see if there was some draft hidden somewhere; it might also be better to place drafts like these in the main draftspace for better visibility for anyone interested to collaborate. Starforce13 17:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Please don't accuse users of being socks without explanation! It isn't very nice. -- Rockstone talk to me! 21:06, 1 August 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
NinjaRobotPirate (
talk)
22:53, 1 August 2019 (UTC)Amaury/2019 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
While I know I've been blocked before, that was way back in 2010, so I essentially have a clean record—or had until this recent block. Given that, while I have absolutely no problem with the administrator themselves, I believe this was a bad block, and it should not have been made. There were no official warnings or attempts to discuss from an administrator on either of the reasons given for the block—there weren't even any warnings in general, just a notice that I had a report filed against me at ANI—and given the time yesterday between my last related edit and the block—1:13 PM and 3:53 PM (PT), respectively—I feel that this block, regardless, is punitive, not preventative. Once the other editor started a talk page discussion on Descendants, I was discussing the issue. From what I've seen in the past, almost all administrators would be happy with that and just give editors warnings. Given my good-standing here, I just feel that a block is too extreme, when I could have just gotten a stern warning. Amaury • 15:12, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Bbb23 ( talk) 15:23, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BTW, Amaury, I'm starting to believe that you are correct that 2600:1700:B7A1:9A30:A4EE:4873:FD0E:E744 is a sock, per the DUCK test. However, you went about dealing with him in the wrong manner. p b p 20:45, 2 August 2019 (UTC)
Hi Amaury! I was quite bummed to read the ANI discussion and the block that your actions got you tangled into. I know you to be a very experienced and knowledgeable editor, and I know that this bump in the road is something you'll learn and move on from. I just wanted to send you a message to welcome you back, to encourage you to take what happened, self-reflect on ways that you can avoid this pitfall in the future, and apply it moving forward. I understand how easy it is to get caught up in the "sock puppet alert" mentality and how it can lead one to make assumptions as soon as you see something. I find myself doing it once in awhile, too... I'm sending you a message of understanding, compassion, and encouragement. If you need someone to talk to, please know that my user talk page is always open to you, and you're welcome there any time you'd like. Keep up the excellent work, take what happened as a learning opportunity, and move forward. We can do nothing about the past, but we can look forward and focus on the future. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~ (talk) (contribs) 04:14, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Now that the flick has aired, the next order of business here, aside from a 'Plot' section, is to add a 'Casting' section, and move of all of the casting sources from the 'Cast' section to the new 'Casting' section. Just sayin'... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 07:08, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
Except I think I saw a promo today that might have had Stony Blyden. I only saw the promo once, so I can't be sure... But I think it showed an older Stony Blyden. But no sign of the other two yet (and I find that really odd in Maemae Renfrow's case, as she shows no work on IMDb since S2...). Still, in a case where people only seem to be credited for the episodes they appear in, I'm not sure we need to record "absences" in this situation anyway. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 22:20, 3 August 2019 (UTC)
@ IJBall: The strange thing here is that unlike the second season, the new characters are appearing in the opening sequence in episodes before their official debut. @ Geraldo Perez: How do we handle the problem here regarding Jake? See the opening sequence here, which clearly shows Jake; however, the problem, as IJBall stated above, is that his actor, Wilson Radjou-Pujalte, is not credited as starring, but rather as co-starring in the end credits, this series' term for guest stars. How do we handle this? We have conflicting info, with actor credits saying guest star/recurring for Wilson Radjou-Pujalte, but the character he portrays, Jake, appearing in the opening sequence linked earlier, meaning main character. Amaury • 04:10, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
@ IJBall: You're already watching this, obviously, but I will need extra attention there. @ Geraldo Perez and MPFitz1968: I'm going to need more eyes at the article. (And, even though there's currently no active disruption there, List of Hunter Street episodes probably wouldn't hurt, either.) IPs repeatedly removing the fact that Jake is recurring in the third season. Amaury • 16:53, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
It's been over a year since the last new episode of this one aired, so I've "called it", and put the end dates in. I'll leave it to you to update the lede at your leisure as you see fit... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 01:04, 5 August 2019 (UTC)
I'll let you appraise the correctness of
this edit...
--
IJBall (
contribs •
talk)
17:28, 7 August 2019 (UTC)
Futon Critic recently updated with the August premieres for RMP. How does it work regarding 114? Up until now, none of the episodes have been separated into "1##A"/"1##B" for the series. Do they get added to the table separately like it is on Futon Critic in the A and B, or just put them in as one under "114" and give the airdate of the first (August 21) and maybe add a note saying the second part premiered on August 22? I haven't had this sort of scenario with a show until now. Magitroopa ( talk) 01:44, 9 August 2019 (UTC)
Need more eyes here – IP repeatedly adding unsourced content about her participation the forthcoming season of Fuller House (which won't be released until "late 2019"), violating WP:CRYSTAL and WP:V. Pinging Geraldo Perez as well. If it happens a couple of more times, semiprotection may be required. -- IJBall ( contribs • talk) 16:56, 10 August 2019 (UTC)
Yeah, the listings on this page are a bit out of wack as of right now- production codes from Futon Critic are being used wrong (duplicate production codes are being used instead of combining or using "###A"/"###B" when necessary), since episodes are not being listed together, duplicate sources from Showbuzz Daily are being used throughout (viewership for the two 102's, the two 103's, and many more in the table), episodes are currently listed in production order instead of original broadcast order, as well as even listing the season number of episodes when there's only one season. That being said, I would love to clean this up. Only problem is, it is an Italian series (country of origin of series is Italy) being aired on Nickelodeon in the US. I have no clue if because origin country is not US that some rules don't apply, but thought I would give it a go anyways. Would love for you to check my sandbox for it to see if it is fine before editing up the main page already on Wikipedia. If the sandbox entry is good, I assume I can just copy/paste that and replace the current table in the main article? I think you're the right person to ask about this, but if I need to discuss/ask this somewhere else first, would love to be directed to the right place regarding this. Thanks in advance. Magitroopa ( talk) 06:03, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
Please read the policy at WP:BRD-NOT carefully. WP:BRDREVERT says, "If you revert twice, then you are no longer following the BRD cycle: If your reversion is reverted, then there may be a good reason for it. Go to the talk page to learn why you were reverted." Krimuk2.0 ( talk) 08:33, 19 August 2019 (UTC)
As you are familiar with guest vs recurring. — YoungForever (talk) 05:51, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
This could arguably be moved into Mainspace now (it technically meets WP:NFF, as filming has been completed, even if its lack of an "more exact" premiere date leaves it a little short on WP:TVSHOW...). But if you want to wait for a more specific release date, I would move it immediately upon that happening... However, in this case, I think we may need Admin help, or at least advice – currently, Zombies 2 is a redirect to Zombi 2. I'd argue that this deserves the Zombies 2 base title (we can always include a hatnote to Zombi 2...), but that's going to mean overwriting the current redirect, and even I as a page mover won't be able to do that. So you're going to need to think about which Admin you want to contact when you're ready to, and you'll need to explain all of this to them when you make the request. Just thinking ahead... -- IJBall ( contribs • talk)
The problem with the template is that the talk page hasn’t been touched in years and not many people would know how to view a template's talk page. Just saying, would you classify Pup Academy as acquired or original? Disney didn’t produce the series. Luigitehplumber ( talk) 22:46, 28 August 2019 (UTC)
I just saw a histmerge tag by IJBall that you already had a userspace draft for this. When the premiere date was announced and I couldn't find it in the main draftspace, I went ahead to create one. I should have probably checked with you guys first to see if there was some draft hidden somewhere; it might also be better to place drafts like these in the main draftspace for better visibility for anyone interested to collaborate. Starforce13 17:17, 30 August 2019 (UTC)