"Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free".
Hello, All Worlds, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Epipelagic (
talk)
20:06, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Please read up on this policy page WP:COPYVIO. This is taken VERY seriously here. He iro 02:26, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to visit me at my talk page. Thank you. This is an almost word for word copy and paste WP:COPYVIO from the source. Please read this policy page and do not repeat this behabior. If you insert copyright violations into articles, it opens up the project to legal action from the copyright holders. If you repeat this behavior, I will take this matter to the admin boards to seek their input on the matter. He iro 03:23, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I am sorry t revert, but I really tried to find a few solid WP:RS sources about the rooftop story and could not confirm it. Do you have a better source than the passing mention in that article? Thanks. History2007 ( talk) 12:20, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
I will work on that and research more on it and get back to you as soon as I can. All Worlds ( talk) 12:39, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
The Amazing Book of Useless Information: http://books.google.com/books?id=zXKVsRH3PFsC&pg=PA15&dq=Pope+Nicholas+I++cockerel&hl=en&sa=X&ei=OQzAT-jDNYqk9ATu2dGcCw&sqi=2&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=cockerel&f=false page 15
The Naked Truth By J. R. Farrell http://books.google.com/books?id=lXWDZnersAAC&pg=PA91&dq=Pope++cockerel&hl=en&sa=X&ei=IBDAT9TtCo-m8gSSqKTDCw&ved=0CEIQ6AEwAzhG#v=onepage&q=Pope%20%20cockerel&f=false page 91
American folk sculpture by Robert Charles Bishop Dutton, 1974 Tradition maintains that a ninth-century pope decreed every church should be capped by a cock, an emblem alluding to Christ's statement to Peter http://books.google.com/books?ei=fVzAT83dMJGE8ATb8NGoCw&id=IxjaAAAAMAAJ&dq=Pope++cockerel&q=Tradition+maintains+that+a+ninth-century+pope+decreed+every+church+should+be+capped+by+a+cock%2C+an+emblem+alluding+to+Christ%27s+statement+to+Peter page 44
Our Vanishing Landscape By Eric Sloane http://books.google.com/books?id=WhfIGc61EdsC&pg=PA96&lpg=PA96&dq=pope+Nicholas++steeple+cock&source=bl&ots=_R7N1FjFcd&sig=zzVICjxFLGSnAU6q55G12S8hSzU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pGXAT8r8G4Sm8gSK6rGjCw&ved=0CFYQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=pope%20Nicholas%20cock&f=false page 96
![]() |
Civility Award | |
After our recent interaction, and having checked out some of your other interactions, I humbly award you the barnstar of civility. For not being offended by reversions and requests for citations and instead responding with sound research and a level head. DoctorLazarusLong ( talk) 04:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks for finding a new source to use on
Cafeteria Christianity.
—
Tom Morris (
talk)
17:06, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
If you read the articles on the Psalms, the books Solomon was supposed to have written, Jeremiah, etc you see that their author ship is disputed, yet your edits don't reflect that and are thus a violation of our core policy WP:NPOV. If I don't beat you to it, could you fix it? You can copy material from other articles but you must put in the edit summary, with a wikilink, a link to that article and say you've copied it from there. You also need to start using WP:Edit summaries. Thanks. Dougweller ( talk) 05:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
For your gracious email. I see you are still having the sort of problems that new editors often encounter, but if you persevere and try to follow our polices and guidelines you will succeed I'm sure. Dougweller ( talk) 09:05, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Leo G. Perdue, All Worlds!
Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I removed a section header.
To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Thank you for the help cleaning up that page. All Worlds ( talk) 08:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions! You don't need to put quotation marks around small snippets of text that you are referencing. Just paraphrase it as best you can. Editor2020 ( talk) 15:32, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
I presume you are one of the latest editors of the article Cockfight. I invite you to see if you agree with the content I added to the article today. Yours, -- Cacucho ( talk) 18:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
I haven't figured this out yet, but James Crenshaw should NOT be deleted. He is one of the most prolific and prominent of current academic bible scholars. He has held named chairs at Duke and Vanderbilt. My university library shows 16 books by him, but that's not all there are. submitted by Michael Fox. MichaelVFox ( talk) 19:51, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
The article
James L. Crenshaw has been
proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Stuartyeates (
talk)
03:09, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agonist (Christian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agonist (Christian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. St Anselm ( talk) 19:50, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sacred cockfight is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred cockfight until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 16:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
"Then you will know the truth, and the truth will set you free".
Hello, All Worlds, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
talk pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on
my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome!
Epipelagic (
talk)
20:06, 23 June 2012 (UTC)
Please read up on this policy page WP:COPYVIO. This is taken VERY seriously here. He iro 02:26, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to visit me at my talk page. Thank you. This is an almost word for word copy and paste WP:COPYVIO from the source. Please read this policy page and do not repeat this behabior. If you insert copyright violations into articles, it opens up the project to legal action from the copyright holders. If you repeat this behavior, I will take this matter to the admin boards to seek their input on the matter. He iro 03:23, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Hi, I am sorry t revert, but I really tried to find a few solid WP:RS sources about the rooftop story and could not confirm it. Do you have a better source than the passing mention in that article? Thanks. History2007 ( talk) 12:20, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
I will work on that and research more on it and get back to you as soon as I can. All Worlds ( talk) 12:39, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
The Amazing Book of Useless Information: http://books.google.com/books?id=zXKVsRH3PFsC&pg=PA15&dq=Pope+Nicholas+I++cockerel&hl=en&sa=X&ei=OQzAT-jDNYqk9ATu2dGcCw&sqi=2&ved=0CDIQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=cockerel&f=false page 15
The Naked Truth By J. R. Farrell http://books.google.com/books?id=lXWDZnersAAC&pg=PA91&dq=Pope++cockerel&hl=en&sa=X&ei=IBDAT9TtCo-m8gSSqKTDCw&ved=0CEIQ6AEwAzhG#v=onepage&q=Pope%20%20cockerel&f=false page 91
American folk sculpture by Robert Charles Bishop Dutton, 1974 Tradition maintains that a ninth-century pope decreed every church should be capped by a cock, an emblem alluding to Christ's statement to Peter http://books.google.com/books?ei=fVzAT83dMJGE8ATb8NGoCw&id=IxjaAAAAMAAJ&dq=Pope++cockerel&q=Tradition+maintains+that+a+ninth-century+pope+decreed+every+church+should+be+capped+by+a+cock%2C+an+emblem+alluding+to+Christ%27s+statement+to+Peter page 44
Our Vanishing Landscape By Eric Sloane http://books.google.com/books?id=WhfIGc61EdsC&pg=PA96&lpg=PA96&dq=pope+Nicholas++steeple+cock&source=bl&ots=_R7N1FjFcd&sig=zzVICjxFLGSnAU6q55G12S8hSzU&hl=en&sa=X&ei=pGXAT8r8G4Sm8gSK6rGjCw&ved=0CFYQ6AEwBQ#v=onepage&q=pope%20Nicholas%20cock&f=false page 96
![]() |
Civility Award | |
After our recent interaction, and having checked out some of your other interactions, I humbly award you the barnstar of civility. For not being offended by reversions and requests for citations and instead responding with sound research and a level head. DoctorLazarusLong ( talk) 04:23, 16 June 2012 (UTC) |
Thanks for finding a new source to use on
Cafeteria Christianity.
—
Tom Morris (
talk)
17:06, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
If you read the articles on the Psalms, the books Solomon was supposed to have written, Jeremiah, etc you see that their author ship is disputed, yet your edits don't reflect that and are thus a violation of our core policy WP:NPOV. If I don't beat you to it, could you fix it? You can copy material from other articles but you must put in the edit summary, with a wikilink, a link to that article and say you've copied it from there. You also need to start using WP:Edit summaries. Thanks. Dougweller ( talk) 05:03, 17 September 2012 (UTC)
For your gracious email. I see you are still having the sort of problems that new editors often encounter, but if you persevere and try to follow our polices and guidelines you will succeed I'm sure. Dougweller ( talk) 09:05, 26 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for creating Leo G. Perdue, All Worlds!
Wikipedia editor I dream of horses just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
I removed a section header.
To reply, leave a comment on I dream of horses's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Thank you for the help cleaning up that page. All Worlds ( talk) 08:03, 27 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions! You don't need to put quotation marks around small snippets of text that you are referencing. Just paraphrase it as best you can. Editor2020 ( talk) 15:32, 2 October 2012 (UTC)
I presume you are one of the latest editors of the article Cockfight. I invite you to see if you agree with the content I added to the article today. Yours, -- Cacucho ( talk) 18:19, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
I haven't figured this out yet, but James Crenshaw should NOT be deleted. He is one of the most prolific and prominent of current academic bible scholars. He has held named chairs at Duke and Vanderbilt. My university library shows 16 books by him, but that's not all there are. submitted by Michael Fox. MichaelVFox ( talk) 19:51, 30 April 2013 (UTC)
The article
James L. Crenshaw has been
proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
Stuartyeates (
talk)
03:09, 6 October 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Agonist (Christian) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Agonist (Christian) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. St Anselm ( talk) 19:50, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sacred cockfight is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sacred cockfight until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Squeamish Ossifrage ( talk) 16:45, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
16:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)