Please feel free to talk to me. Alison Chabloz ( talk) 23:34, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
I have removed usernames from the reference tags on your userpage. It made it appear that those editors made the edits that added your name to the article. I searched and confirmed that Widefox did not make the edit that had his name attached. I did not search for the other name but removed it any way. You need to make sure when you make edits that you do not attribute edits to someone that did not make them. As a suggestion, I would consider taking the content on your userpage down. Your name has been removed from the articles and you no longer have to point it out that your name is in those articles. ~ GB fan 16:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Yes, that's fine. There seem to be no clear instructions on how to fill in the 'cite web' templates. Apologies for my newbie error. However, I would like to point out that someone with over 60k edits to their name might have reacted sooner to what was a clear violation of BLP rules regards edits (made by others) to an article nonetheless published by this very same 60k+ editor. I will update my userpage accordingly, once I have digested the fuller implications of the past few days' events and learned the outcome of my present legal situation. Alison Chabloz ( talk) 17:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Because Wikipedia is completely voluntary, under no circumstances are editors obligated or expected to make any edits, respond to any messages, or to otherwise have any involvement.
Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information.
There are no set crews or teams working on articles on any topic, just those who come along and volunteer information at any time they wish.
Anyone can take a break for any period of time or drop out whenever they like.
You can always stop working on one group of articles, take up working on another for a while, then resume the previous one, with no expectations from others.(emphasis own)
The false assertion is that any editor is in any way responsible or has any sort of duty for other editor's edits is preposterous, misrepresents, and misleads involvement and duties, especially when using the incorrect term "publisher". To clarify the role of a publisher, see publisher#Legal issues. I am sorry you have felt the need to get involved holding WP to its good standards, but I personally neither know, nor care about any of which you talk about. We do, however work by WP:CONSENSUS here, and two of us have advised you to remove what you put on your user page, which you have yet to do, as well as fix these false assertions. Widefox; talk 02:54, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Alison Chabloz. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Campaign Against Antisemitism, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Widefox; talk 10:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GorillaWarfare
(talk)
19:00, 2 July 2019 (UTC)( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Just adding an on-wiki note for any reviewing admins that this user has made a legal threat towards me via email. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Alison Chabloz ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #25791 was submitted on Jul 03, 2019 12:02:19. This review is now closed.
Please feel free to talk to me. Alison Chabloz ( talk) 23:34, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
I have removed usernames from the reference tags on your userpage. It made it appear that those editors made the edits that added your name to the article. I searched and confirmed that Widefox did not make the edit that had his name attached. I did not search for the other name but removed it any way. You need to make sure when you make edits that you do not attribute edits to someone that did not make them. As a suggestion, I would consider taking the content on your userpage down. Your name has been removed from the articles and you no longer have to point it out that your name is in those articles. ~ GB fan 16:50, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Yes, that's fine. There seem to be no clear instructions on how to fill in the 'cite web' templates. Apologies for my newbie error. However, I would like to point out that someone with over 60k edits to their name might have reacted sooner to what was a clear violation of BLP rules regards edits (made by others) to an article nonetheless published by this very same 60k+ editor. I will update my userpage accordingly, once I have digested the fuller implications of the past few days' events and learned the outcome of my present legal situation. Alison Chabloz ( talk) 17:41, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Because Wikipedia is completely voluntary, under no circumstances are editors obligated or expected to make any edits, respond to any messages, or to otherwise have any involvement.
Please be advised that nothing found here has necessarily been reviewed by people with the expertise required to provide you with complete, accurate or reliable information.
There are no set crews or teams working on articles on any topic, just those who come along and volunteer information at any time they wish.
Anyone can take a break for any period of time or drop out whenever they like.
You can always stop working on one group of articles, take up working on another for a while, then resume the previous one, with no expectations from others.(emphasis own)
The false assertion is that any editor is in any way responsible or has any sort of duty for other editor's edits is preposterous, misrepresents, and misleads involvement and duties, especially when using the incorrect term "publisher". To clarify the role of a publisher, see publisher#Legal issues. I am sorry you have felt the need to get involved holding WP to its good standards, but I personally neither know, nor care about any of which you talk about. We do, however work by WP:CONSENSUS here, and two of us have advised you to remove what you put on your user page, which you have yet to do, as well as fix these false assertions. Widefox; talk 02:54, 18 November 2017 (UTC)
Hello, Alison Chabloz. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Campaign Against Antisemitism, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Widefox; talk 10:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
GorillaWarfare
(talk)
19:00, 2 July 2019 (UTC)( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Just adding an on-wiki note for any reviewing admins that this user has made a legal threat towards me via email. GorillaWarfare (talk) 20:11, 2 July 2019 (UTC)
Alison Chabloz ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
UTRS appeal #25791 was submitted on Jul 03, 2019 12:02:19. This review is now closed.