Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 21:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ali55te. Just a notice: it's best to avoid templating the regulars, such as this. Please also note the definition of vandalism, which isn't an edit you disagree with. I am also going to introduce two templates of my own below: one which is a belated welcome, and the other which introduces notifications of sanctions for editors who act impolitely in any way, or who edit war concerning issues related to the Caucuses, as I thought you might be unaware. Thanks! Magog the Ogre ( talk) 07:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
|
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia- Azerbaijan and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 07:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm not involved in the particulars of the dispute here. In fact I'm entirely unqualified to do so. If you think you were acting completely correctly, feel free to speak to admin Dbachmann, who is familiar with the background. Really I don't have a horse in this race, but referring to well intentioned edits as vandalism is a bad sign for me. You might want to check out WP:DV, which deals with that very issue. In addition, I see three different people you've been edit warring with in the past few days, and that's not good. Please try to come to a consensus on the talk page first. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 01:32, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Well, you've only received a notice. You haven't even had the sanctions placed on you, and I don't have plans to do so at the moment. I'd be glad to cross out some of the wording though, mainly "if you engage in further inappropriate behavior." Magog the Ogre ( talk) 03:21, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
An AE proceeding was launched against User:Dighapet [1]. This may concern you since you were involved in editing articles with his participation. Gorzaim ( talk) 00:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 23:59, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ali55te. FYI, I just noticed that you voted "oppose" twice. Take care. Dr.K. λogos πraxis 04:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Ali55te. When you have time, could you check Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Meowy ? Thank you. Takabeg ( talk) 09:57, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Could you please explain why you deleted my edit in the talk page of that article? Filanca ( talk) 21:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
I am carrying this discussion to the talk page of the article. Meanwhile, please do not delete the sourced material. For one thing, it will be your third revert, which may be violating a Wikipedia rule. Let us speak about it first. Filanca ( talk) 19:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
On my last edit I wrote that only L-3 document contains the Armenian quote and I added the reference to documents 1014-PS, 789-Ps. You somehow read that wrongly and reverted the edit so now it writes that 3 documents include the armenian quote and you removed all the references to the 1014 and 789. Just read my last edit carefully and try to recover that part. I said 3 documents include the Hitler's speech on that day not the Armenian quote. Ali55te ( talk) 01:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
I have seen that you add a sentence to the origin of the document with referencing Arnold Reisman, but he is not a historian and he is not recognized as a genocide scholar. If his sentences can be written as a fact like that than the we can clearly write that the quote is from the Hitler's speech with referencing the genocide scholars. I think you should move that statement to the contesting interpretations and change the title of the subsection to Origin of the document according to Louis P. Lochner 23:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali55te ( talk • contribs)
Ali55te ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Someone openned a sockpuppet investigation related to me and another person. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Xebulon/Archive#30_September_2011 an administrator with a checkuser privilage checked the accoutns and he wrote that I have no connection with the Xebulon and the other account has. But it seems like AGK read that wrongly because he blocked me and he did not do anything about the other person. I sent some e-mails to the Admins, sorry for that interruption because it took some time to realse that I can not reach my talk page because it is redirected by AGK. Thank you for your interest
Accept reason:
I only did our duty. Now you came back here, you have right to edit. But we have good chance to control your hyper biased edits. Takabeg ( talk) 16:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Takabeg ( talk) 16:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conscience Films is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conscience Films until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dac04 ( talk) 16:38, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
User:Grandmaster has filed an AE report on Nagorno-Karabakh trying to limit participation in the article. Take a look as a user active on the article’s talk pages. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Nagorno-Karabakh_article Dehr ( talk) 16:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
I would like to pick the brain of more experienced users about the ongoing exchange between [User:Grandmaster] and a couple of administrators. Grandmaster suggests to restrict access to some and potentially to all articles in Armenia-Azerbaijan by excluding new users [9]. You can reply on my home page if you wish. Dehr ( talk) 19:19, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Armenian Genocide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Smith ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nakhchivan (city), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Tamzara. Parishan ( talk) 12:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for opposing the denial of the Armenian Genocide. May I ask how you place the notification on your page about opposing the denial. I also want this. HyeSK ( talk) 22:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)HyeSK
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 21:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ali55te. Just a notice: it's best to avoid templating the regulars, such as this. Please also note the definition of vandalism, which isn't an edit you disagree with. I am also going to introduce two templates of my own below: one which is a belated welcome, and the other which introduces notifications of sanctions for editors who act impolitely in any way, or who edit war concerning issues related to the Caucuses, as I thought you might be unaware. Thanks! Magog the Ogre ( talk) 07:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
|
The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose, at their own discretion, sanctions on any editor working on pages broadly related to Armenia- Azerbaijan and related conflicts if the editor repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process. If you engage in further inappropriate behavior in this area, you may be placed under sanctions including blocks, a revert limitation or an article ban. The committee's full decision can be read at Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Armenia-Azerbaijan 2#Final decision. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 07:44, 9 March 2011 (UTC)
I'm not involved in the particulars of the dispute here. In fact I'm entirely unqualified to do so. If you think you were acting completely correctly, feel free to speak to admin Dbachmann, who is familiar with the background. Really I don't have a horse in this race, but referring to well intentioned edits as vandalism is a bad sign for me. You might want to check out WP:DV, which deals with that very issue. In addition, I see three different people you've been edit warring with in the past few days, and that's not good. Please try to come to a consensus on the talk page first. Magog the Ogre ( talk) 01:32, 11 March 2011 (UTC)
Well, you've only received a notice. You haven't even had the sanctions placed on you, and I don't have plans to do so at the moment. I'd be glad to cross out some of the wording though, mainly "if you engage in further inappropriate behavior." Magog the Ogre ( talk) 03:21, 21 March 2011 (UTC)
An AE proceeding was launched against User:Dighapet [1]. This may concern you since you were involved in editing articles with his participation. Gorzaim ( talk) 00:33, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 23:59, 6 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi Ali55te. FYI, I just noticed that you voted "oppose" twice. Take care. Dr.K. λogos πraxis 04:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi, Ali55te. When you have time, could you check Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Meowy ? Thank you. Takabeg ( talk) 09:57, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
Could you please explain why you deleted my edit in the talk page of that article? Filanca ( talk) 21:49, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
I am carrying this discussion to the talk page of the article. Meanwhile, please do not delete the sourced material. For one thing, it will be your third revert, which may be violating a Wikipedia rule. Let us speak about it first. Filanca ( talk) 19:01, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
On my last edit I wrote that only L-3 document contains the Armenian quote and I added the reference to documents 1014-PS, 789-Ps. You somehow read that wrongly and reverted the edit so now it writes that 3 documents include the armenian quote and you removed all the references to the 1014 and 789. Just read my last edit carefully and try to recover that part. I said 3 documents include the Hitler's speech on that day not the Armenian quote. Ali55te ( talk) 01:10, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
I have seen that you add a sentence to the origin of the document with referencing Arnold Reisman, but he is not a historian and he is not recognized as a genocide scholar. If his sentences can be written as a fact like that than the we can clearly write that the quote is from the Hitler's speech with referencing the genocide scholars. I think you should move that statement to the contesting interpretations and change the title of the subsection to Origin of the document according to Louis P. Lochner 23:36, 29 September 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ali55te ( talk • contribs)
Ali55te ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Someone openned a sockpuppet investigation related to me and another person. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Xebulon/Archive#30_September_2011 an administrator with a checkuser privilage checked the accoutns and he wrote that I have no connection with the Xebulon and the other account has. But it seems like AGK read that wrongly because he blocked me and he did not do anything about the other person. I sent some e-mails to the Admins, sorry for that interruption because it took some time to realse that I can not reach my talk page because it is redirected by AGK. Thank you for your interest
Accept reason:
I only did our duty. Now you came back here, you have right to edit. But we have good chance to control your hyper biased edits. Takabeg ( talk) 16:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Takabeg ( talk) 16:05, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Conscience Films is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Conscience Films until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Dac04 ( talk) 16:38, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
User:Grandmaster has filed an AE report on Nagorno-Karabakh trying to limit participation in the article. Take a look as a user active on the article’s talk pages. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Nagorno-Karabakh_article Dehr ( talk) 16:50, 27 February 2012 (UTC)
I would like to pick the brain of more experienced users about the ongoing exchange between [User:Grandmaster] and a couple of administrators. Grandmaster suggests to restrict access to some and potentially to all articles in Armenia-Azerbaijan by excluding new users [9]. You can reply on my home page if you wish. Dehr ( talk) 19:19, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Hi. When you recently edited Armenian Genocide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roger Smith ( check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 10:57, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nakhchivan (city), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Armenian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 08:54, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Please see Talk:Tamzara. Parishan ( talk) 12:34, 10 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for opposing the denial of the Armenian Genocide. May I ask how you place the notification on your page about opposing the denial. I also want this. HyeSK ( talk) 22:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)HyeSK