![]() |
Hi AlexVegaEsquire! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC) |
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 04:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)I have started a section at Talk:Kevin_Deutsch#Dispute for you and the other user to discuss your disagreements, since apparently neither one of you know how to do that. Ian.thomson ( talk) 23:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
You reverted my edit to Kevin Deutsch with the comment, Undid edit because it ciolates Wiki's living person's policies. Deutsch has written thousands of articles and a fraction of them have been qstnd. Revision contains other inaccuracies. However, my edit, on which I commented Typo, merely changed the words "this mother's name" to "his mother's name". Please take more care when making revisions. -- Pemilligan ( talk) 13:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
I am having a difficult time keeping my sourced information in the article, particularly in the introduction. The information re: the article subject specializing in stories about "gangs and drug trafficking" is at the heart of the article, and had been part of it for months. SnowFire, a user who recently began making major revisions to the article, continues to undo my sourced and accurate revisions without good cause. Can a moderate please resolve our dispute? I work a sixty hour week and consider contributory encyclopedias an interesting/valuable hobby, but having my edits wiped out by someone who seems to have a serious grudge about the article subject is disheartening. Thank you.
I have been monitoring the recent edit war and feel the party who wanted article subject denial in lead of article is correct. I cannot see how this can be avoided given seriousness of accusations. I created the page for this writer back before this controversy happened and feel he has pretty forcefully denied the allegations.
What's the rationale for not including in lead?
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
SnowFire (
talk)
14:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Deutsch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Deutsch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Carrite ( talk) 12:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.
![]() |
Hi AlexVegaEsquire! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 11 November 2016 (UTC) |
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Ramaksoud2000 ( Talk to me) 04:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)I have started a section at Talk:Kevin_Deutsch#Dispute for you and the other user to discuss your disagreements, since apparently neither one of you know how to do that. Ian.thomson ( talk) 23:38, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
You reverted my edit to Kevin Deutsch with the comment, Undid edit because it ciolates Wiki's living person's policies. Deutsch has written thousands of articles and a fraction of them have been qstnd. Revision contains other inaccuracies. However, my edit, on which I commented Typo, merely changed the words "this mother's name" to "his mother's name". Please take more care when making revisions. -- Pemilligan ( talk) 13:39, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
I am having a difficult time keeping my sourced information in the article, particularly in the introduction. The information re: the article subject specializing in stories about "gangs and drug trafficking" is at the heart of the article, and had been part of it for months. SnowFire, a user who recently began making major revisions to the article, continues to undo my sourced and accurate revisions without good cause. Can a moderate please resolve our dispute? I work a sixty hour week and consider contributory encyclopedias an interesting/valuable hobby, but having my edits wiped out by someone who seems to have a serious grudge about the article subject is disheartening. Thank you.
I have been monitoring the recent edit war and feel the party who wanted article subject denial in lead of article is correct. I cannot see how this can be avoided given seriousness of accusations. I created the page for this writer back before this controversy happened and feel he has pretty forcefully denied the allegations.
What's the rationale for not including in lead?
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
SnowFire (
talk)
14:47, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Deutsch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kevin Deutsch until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Carrite ( talk) 12:55, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
There is currently a discussion at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved.
{{
unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the
Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.