An article you recently created,
List of Israeli films of 2016, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk) 07:50, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
-- Jorm ( talk) 15:12, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Would you mind looking at the Call-out Culture article? It's been edited basically down to a sentence or two by Bacondrum. Thanks. -- DeRossitt ( talk) 22:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, please read WP:PROD as a prod cannot be replaced once removed for any reason. Also, I remember this subject had significant coverage in the UK such as the BBC, Channel 4, Guardian etc.If you disagree then please take to WP:AFD, regards Atlantic306 ( talk) 21:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Gab (social network); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹 🌉 22:11, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 12:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. This prohibition is preferably enforced by the use of extended confirmed protection, but where that is not feasible, it may also be enforced by reverts, page protections, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters.
The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:
Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the above methods. This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, noticeboard discussions, etc. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required.
I note that there has been at least on complaint about your use of an article talk page, so you need to watch that.
Doug Weller
talk 12:10, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Welcome. It can take a while to get you sealegs, our rules are Byzantine. Nevertheless, welcome, it's nice when intelligent new editors join the project. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 20:05, 16 May 2019 (UTC) |
Thanks you Bijnorlion ( talk) 16:42, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Is it inappropriate to include a cultural history assessment of a town in the heading of an article? That's what I was trying to do in the Sheridan, Wyoming article with the cited quote from Kathryn Schulz, instead of leaving the entire intro to demographic data. If you read the cited article from Schulz, the cosmopolitan quote is right there. The cosmopolitan mix of people and cultural influences she describes is fully backed up and cited in the history section below. "The town has displayed what one writer dubbed "a kind of frontier-cosmopolitan chic," since at least 1909, which developed from its mix of cowboy, American Indian, immigrant, and tourist influences. [1]" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.72.157.115 ( talk • contribs) 21:04, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Alex.osheter,
This is Sean King. I used to be a Wikipedia contributor and I wanted to simply thank you for what you're doing to challenge the strong bias and inaccurate statements on the pages for Gab and Epik.
There is an Administrative Notice Board report ( which can be found here) concerning Bacondrum's edits to the Call-out culture article. I am posting this notice on the Talk pages of the ten most frequent contributors to the article who have accounts on Wikipedia. -- DeRossitt ( talk) 23:06, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
~ Kvng ( talk) 21:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Template:TracklistData has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 15:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
List of Israeli films of 2016, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from
reliable,
independent sources. (
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
CASSIOPEIA(
talk) 07:50, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
-- Jorm ( talk) 15:12, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Would you mind looking at the Call-out Culture article? It's been edited basically down to a sentence or two by Bacondrum. Thanks. -- DeRossitt ( talk) 22:38, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi, please read WP:PROD as a prod cannot be replaced once removed for any reason. Also, I remember this subject had significant coverage in the UK such as the BBC, Channel 4, Guardian etc.If you disagree then please take to WP:AFD, regards Atlantic306 ( talk) 21:07, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an
edit war according to the reverts you have made on
Gab (social network); that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to
collaborate with others, to avoid editing
disruptively, and to
try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Tsumikiria⧸ 🌹 🌉 22:11, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 12:01, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
All IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. This prohibition is preferably enforced by the use of extended confirmed protection, but where that is not feasible, it may also be enforced by reverts, page protections, blocks, the use of pending changes, and appropriate edit filters.
The sole exceptions to this prohibition are:
Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may use the Talk: namespace to post constructive comments and make edit requests related to articles within the topic area, provided they are not disruptive. Talk pages where disruption occurs may be managed by any of the above methods. This exception does not apply to other internal project discussions such as AfDs, WikiProjects, noticeboard discussions, etc. Editors who are not eligible to be extended-confirmed may not create new articles, but administrators may exercise discretion when deciding how to enforce this remedy on article creations. Deletion of new articles by editors who do not meet the criteria is permitted but not required.
I note that there has been at least on complaint about your use of an article talk page, so you need to watch that.
Doug Weller
talk 12:10, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
|
Welcome. It can take a while to get you sealegs, our rules are Byzantine. Nevertheless, welcome, it's nice when intelligent new editors join the project. E.M.Gregory ( talk) 20:05, 16 May 2019 (UTC) |
Thanks you Bijnorlion ( talk) 16:42, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Is it inappropriate to include a cultural history assessment of a town in the heading of an article? That's what I was trying to do in the Sheridan, Wyoming article with the cited quote from Kathryn Schulz, instead of leaving the entire intro to demographic data. If you read the cited article from Schulz, the cosmopolitan quote is right there. The cosmopolitan mix of people and cultural influences she describes is fully backed up and cited in the history section below. "The town has displayed what one writer dubbed "a kind of frontier-cosmopolitan chic," since at least 1909, which developed from its mix of cowboy, American Indian, immigrant, and tourist influences. [1]" — Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.72.157.115 ( talk • contribs) 21:04, 17 May 2019 (UTC)
Hi Alex.osheter,
This is Sean King. I used to be a Wikipedia contributor and I wanted to simply thank you for what you're doing to challenge the strong bias and inaccurate statements on the pages for Gab and Epik.
There is an Administrative Notice Board report ( which can be found here) concerning Bacondrum's edits to the Call-out culture article. I am posting this notice on the Talk pages of the ten most frequent contributors to the article who have accounts on Wikipedia. -- DeRossitt ( talk) 23:06, 3 June 2019 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
~ Kvng ( talk) 21:52, 20 August 2019 (UTC)
Template:TracklistData has been
nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at
the entry on the Templates for discussion page. –
Jonesey95 (
talk) 15:58, 13 December 2022 (UTC)