Welcome!
Hello, AlastorMoody, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
PMDrive1061 (
talk)
20:06, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Your aim is "to provide assistance against the struggle with vandalism"? Am I reading that right? Peridon ( talk) 21:39, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Alastor,
I'm sorry but I have to catagorically disagree with your GA reassessment. See my comments at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mariah Carey (album)/1 and also see a rapidly developing discussion at [ WT:GA Nominations#Mariah Carey (album)].
No hard feelings and no offense but the album needs a lot of work. And even though I'm a fan myself the prognosis is not good lol -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 (talk2me) 21:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback. However I have to disagree with you on somethings. First of all to begin with, I don't know what to correct without a proper GA review to go by. Also, I've worked on the article for some time and it is "broad in its coverage" as it can get and expansive. If I do say so myself as long as articles cover the topic well itself, the complete size as a whole doesn't matter, as seen in GA's Favorite Girl, and U Smile, and several other articles I have reviewed and nominated myself. I am hoping you will reconsider and at least do a complete review of the article before I nominate it for reassessment. Candy o32 20:58, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Hey :). Please join the discussion here.-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 14:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
I have replied to your comments. Nergaal ( talk) 07:01, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, nominators will probably appreciate that you support so often, but I noticed you hardly drop more than a line even for long articles. Every pair of eyes looking at a nomination is valuable, so please engage in some critique, too. Hekerui ( talk) 09:40, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps you should consider the idea that someone might review a selection of articles, then post all the supports at once? Of course, it is easier to assume bad faith, but just saying it's a possibility. AD 12:35, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I was wondering if you could comment further at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of X-Men video games/archive1. Nomader and I do not see where the lead can be expanded and hope that you could clarify. ( Guyinblack25 talk 15:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC))
Hey. You had weighed in at the first FAC for South Park (season 13), which got hung up largely because of the image. Now there is a second FAC discussion ongoing, where once again the image is dominating the conversation. At the FA delegate's suggestion, I am asking everyone who participated in the first FAC to weigh in once again, if it's not too much trouble, but please comment on the full set of FA criteria rather than just the image fair use rationale, so we can work toward a consensus on the overall FAC. Thanks! — Hun ter Ka hn 17:47, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
I hope you don't forget this FLC. Since your last post on 12th December, you haven't visited and didn't address your comments.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 12:33, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, AlastorMoody, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
Wikipedian! Please
sign your messages on
discussion pages using four
tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out
Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --
PMDrive1061 (
talk)
20:06, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Your aim is "to provide assistance against the struggle with vandalism"? Am I reading that right? Peridon ( talk) 21:39, 15 July 2010 (UTC)
Hi Alastor,
I'm sorry but I have to catagorically disagree with your GA reassessment. See my comments at Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mariah Carey (album)/1 and also see a rapidly developing discussion at [ WT:GA Nominations#Mariah Carey (album)].
No hard feelings and no offense but the album needs a lot of work. And even though I'm a fan myself the prognosis is not good lol -- Lil_℧niquℇ №1 (talk2me) 21:46, 16 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your feedback. However I have to disagree with you on somethings. First of all to begin with, I don't know what to correct without a proper GA review to go by. Also, I've worked on the article for some time and it is "broad in its coverage" as it can get and expansive. If I do say so myself as long as articles cover the topic well itself, the complete size as a whole doesn't matter, as seen in GA's Favorite Girl, and U Smile, and several other articles I have reviewed and nominated myself. I am hoping you will reconsider and at least do a complete review of the article before I nominate it for reassessment. Candy o32 20:58, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
Hey :). Please join the discussion here.-- CallMeNathan • Talk2Me 14:28, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
I have replied to your comments. Nergaal ( talk) 07:01, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Hey, nominators will probably appreciate that you support so often, but I noticed you hardly drop more than a line even for long articles. Every pair of eyes looking at a nomination is valuable, so please engage in some critique, too. Hekerui ( talk) 09:40, 18 November 2010 (UTC)
Perhaps you should consider the idea that someone might review a selection of articles, then post all the supports at once? Of course, it is easier to assume bad faith, but just saying it's a possibility. AD 12:35, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. I was wondering if you could comment further at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of X-Men video games/archive1. Nomader and I do not see where the lead can be expanded and hope that you could clarify. ( Guyinblack25 talk 15:48, 16 December 2010 (UTC))
Hey. You had weighed in at the first FAC for South Park (season 13), which got hung up largely because of the image. Now there is a second FAC discussion ongoing, where once again the image is dominating the conversation. At the FA delegate's suggestion, I am asking everyone who participated in the first FAC to weigh in once again, if it's not too much trouble, but please comment on the full set of FA criteria rather than just the image fair use rationale, so we can work toward a consensus on the overall FAC. Thanks! — Hun ter Ka hn 17:47, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
I hope you don't forget this FLC. Since your last post on 12th December, you haven't visited and didn't address your comments.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 12:33, 1 January 2011 (UTC)