Welcome to Wikipedia. It would be appreciated if you would not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. - Smerdis of Tlön ( talk) 20:53, 27 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Unfortunately it seems that the great bulk of this article is copied directly from the church's website: [1]. I have removed this text, but if you have or obtain permission from the site's owners to use it unaltered, it can be restored - although you will have gathered from the discussions that if it is, it is likely to require a lot of editing. A fresh article, perhaps shorter and in a more neutral tone, using some of the independent references now added, may well be helpful in regard to the discussion about its possible deletion. HeartofaDog ( talk) 01:43, 28 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Eternal Sacred Order of Cherubim and Seraphim. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. The Deletion discussion has not yet been concluded Mayalld ( talk) 11:08, 28 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mayalld ( talk) 11:47, 28 November 2007 (UTC) reply

Thanks for uploading Image:1175439857 62.49.27.213.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{ GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{ non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 22:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. B ( talk) 22:06, 6 January 2008 (UTC) reply