This is Akhshartag's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
02:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hello, Akhshartag
Thank you for creating Kurkha.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 01:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Apaugasma. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Alevism, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. ☿
Apaugasma (
talk
☉)
22:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Rakesh Narwani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
09:54, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Akhshartag!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
RPSkokie (
talk)
09:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
|
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.— Ermenrich ( talk) 12:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theseus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Phaedra and Aethra. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pythagoras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mnesarchus.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Haplogroup J (Y-DNA), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cypriots.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Melqart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heroes.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
I recommend you read this recent discussion at WT:CGR to gain an understanding of the current consensus on what is required before adding deity equivalencies to infoboxes. – Michael Aurel ( talk) 13:27, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I have noticed that you have added the "Arab Christian saints" category to a multitude of pages of Saints from various countries in the Middle East/West Asia without backing up these claims. Please be aware that not only Arabs are present in these regions as many other ethnic groups such as Syrians (in a historical context referring to Arameans/native Levantines), Maronites, Assyrians, Greeks, Copts and others inhabit or inhabited these areas as well. If you wish to add information regarding the ethnicity of a Saint please provide a source when doing so. Red Phoenician ( talk) 02:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Saint Salib, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 07:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abibus of Edessa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agreement.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
Pbritti (
talk)
23:32, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Pbritti. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Seraphim Rose, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. It looks like you're also leaning towards
edit-warring. Please refrain from
disruptive editing. Let me know if you want to discuss things. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
03:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please respond here or on one of the talk pages where I will ping you for discussion. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
13:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Arab Christians, you may be blocked from editing. This edit suggests that you are unwilling to respond civilly to other editors who have concerns about your editing. Please engage in discussion. ~ Pbritti ( talk) 19:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saint Apostolos the New, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magnesia.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
02:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Nah nigga im still here
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
11:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
03:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Akhshartag. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Rakesh Narwani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Isaac Attallah. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and several issues with copyright violation of https://orthochristian.com/140813.html. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 10:15, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
This is Akhshartag's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
02:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Hello, Akhshartag
Thank you for creating Kurkha.
User:North8000, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Nice work
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
North8000 ( talk) 01:45, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Apaugasma. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Alevism, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you. ☿
Apaugasma (
talk
☉)
22:55, 11 March 2023 (UTC)
An article you recently created,
Rakesh Narwani, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from
reliable,
independent sources in order to show it meets
WP:GNG. It should have at least three, to be safe. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG.(
?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (
verifiability is of
central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to
draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's
general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
Onel5969
TT me
09:54, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, Akhshartag!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
RPSkokie (
talk)
09:21, 12 May 2023 (UTC)
|
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.— Ermenrich ( talk) 12:47, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Theseus, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Phaedra and Aethra. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:00, 16 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pythagoras, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mnesarchus.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 10:29, 23 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Haplogroup J (Y-DNA), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cypriots.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Melqart, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Heroes.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:01, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
I recommend you read this recent discussion at WT:CGR to gain an understanding of the current consensus on what is required before adding deity equivalencies to infoboxes. – Michael Aurel ( talk) 13:27, 6 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I have noticed that you have added the "Arab Christian saints" category to a multitude of pages of Saints from various countries in the Middle East/West Asia without backing up these claims. Please be aware that not only Arabs are present in these regions as many other ethnic groups such as Syrians (in a historical context referring to Arameans/native Levantines), Maronites, Assyrians, Greeks, Copts and others inhabit or inhabited these areas as well. If you wish to add information regarding the ethnicity of a Saint please provide a source when doing so. Red Phoenician ( talk) 02:34, 30 August 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that
this edit performed by you, on the page
Saint Salib, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) ( talk) 07:09, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:02, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abibus of Edessa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Agreement.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:59, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello. I have noticed that you
often edit without using an
edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in
your preferences. Thanks!
Pbritti (
talk)
23:32, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
Pbritti. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article,
Seraphim Rose, but you didn't provide a
reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to
include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at
referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. It looks like you're also leaning towards
edit-warring. Please refrain from
disruptive editing. Let me know if you want to discuss things. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
03:07, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being
blocked from editing—especially if you violate the
three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three
reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Please respond here or on one of the talk pages where I will ping you for discussion. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
13:33, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing.
If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Arab Christians, you may be blocked from editing. This edit suggests that you are unwilling to respond civilly to other editors who have concerns about your editing. Please engage in discussion. ~ Pbritti ( talk) 19:02, 26 September 2023 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Saint Apostolos the New, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Magnesia.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:04, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at
Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on
edit warring. Thank you. ~
Pbritti (
talk)
02:33, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
Nah nigga im still here
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
11:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC){{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Daniel Case (
talk)
03:36, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Hello, Akhshartag. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Rakesh Narwani, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 10:01, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for your contributions to Isaac Attallah. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and several issues with copyright violation of https://orthochristian.com/140813.html. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Vanderwaalforces ( talk) 10:15, 21 October 2023 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Daniel Case ( talk) 04:13, 8 November 2023 (UTC)