![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Akerans has not edited Wikipedia since December 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
/Archive 1 |
A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Restoring Honor rally was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.
Thank you, AGK 21:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
All material on that article was used with permission from the owner of the company. They are contacting the wikipedia admins. Please give it some time. :)
Debolina Sengupta 21:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Debolina Sengupta ( talk • contribs)
The request for mediation concerning Restoring Honor rally, to which you were are a party, has been accepted. Please watchlist the case page (which is where the mediation will take place). For guidance on accepted cases, refer to this resource. A mediator should be assigned to this dispute within two weeks. If you have any queries, please contact a Committee member or the mediation mailing list.
For the Mediation Committee,
AGK
19:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Message delivered by
MediationBot, on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
Thank you for correcting my referencing on this page. I was online trying to work out how to reference things properly when you did it for me. Thanks a lot. Do you know how to add images? I haven't mastered that yet and would love to get the album art up for this album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravenvenom ( talk • contribs) 05:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Reply to your message on Rohatgi.
Read your reply and reread it again and again. I have posted reliable sources that show box-office collections and release dates of her B-grade sleazy films. In case you want to continue, then maybe a media article in the papers will show how her PR team is trying to falsify facts about her life and her work. Now, this is a PROPER warning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hello5678 ( talk • contribs) 08:01, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Greetings!
I have agreed to mediate the Restoring Honor case. I'm requesting that all parties start with opening statements, instructions are at the top of the page. Thanks for agreeing to go to mediation, I'm hopeful we can get this resolved to the satisfaction of all parties. Don't hesitate to contact me with any questions or issues. -- WGFinley ( talk) 00:52, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Akerans,
I removed three pictures of H.H. K'ung that were on his page. There were 4 pictures, one portrait of H.H. K'ung and three others all of which contained Adolph Hitler. H.H. K'ung was the Premier of China and held other posts such as the Head of the Central Bank and Minister of Finance. Just because he met with Hitler one time prior to World War II doesn't mean that he should be portrayed with Hitler in 75% of his pictures on Wikipedia. It's silly and misrepresents him. Why do you keep reversing it? Do I need to post some pictures of him with Churchil and Roosevelt and Chiang Kai-Chek? And if I wanted to do so, how would I do that? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gekung ( talk • contribs) 18:41, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
That would apply to the project page itself. So your point would be? The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous ( talk) 02:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
I, in error, tried to add/.alter a friend's page but changed my mind and tagged what I thought was my addition but I tagged his whole article because I did not know what I was doing I thought I was tagging any changes I made to be deleted. I messed up and will not try add to wikipedia again but would feel bad if he lost his page due to my error. Please revert to copy of article after my edits/tags. I did them at work so my ip address was not the same as my home IP. Can you revert to earlier version? Help I am so sorry Fixer789 ( talk) 19:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
I altered /Andrew james dubats earlier today and I did not even know I had to make a user account before I did it. I made this account after reading a bit but realised I am over my head and did not know how to fix my errors. Fixer789 ( talk) 19:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
I altered "Andrew james dubats" earlier today and I did not even know I had to make a user account before I did it. I thought I fixed it by tagging my keystrokes for deletion but instead tagged his page for deletion,( because I was at work and rushed and am an idiot)I made this account after reading a bit but realised I am over my head and did not know how to fix my errors. I do not want him to lose his page over my mistakes. Can his page be reverted to before my messing around? Fixer789 ( talk) 19:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
I now believe after reading your requirements think that he very well may meet the citeria for a low profile subject due to his interviews with music artists for Specs Howard. I feel very bad that my block deletion may be the reason for any problems with his page. I hope this is not the case. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Fixer789 (
talk •
contribs)
20:02, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Fixer789 (
talk •
contribs)
20:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your proper formatting of that page. I am contributing info on that page with reliable sources. But I am very poor in editing, Sir. After placing text and saving the page I noticed that despite repeated efforts, the words Kulothunga Chola III have come in bold at four or five places. I cannot seem to correct the problem. Shall be grateful for your help and guidance.
Also in case you read that page you will find some paras repeating. This is to inform you that my edit of that page is not yet over. Some overview was added by me long time back, now I have books with me while editing. Broadly those repeats are original texts which have to be appropriately paraphrased quoting sources of info. I have also arrange those texts chronologically. As I proceed with the work, I will keep deleting the unwanted/unnecessary material. Till that time, let that (useless) text remain please, for it will help me with editing the page. Thanks.
Srirangam99 ( talk) 10:54, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Srirangam99 ( talk) 04:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Book Name: "A History of South India", K.A.Nilakanta Sastri, (2002)(Oxford University Press), page: 178 ISBN no. 0 19 560 686 8
Sir, thanks for your immense help in taking your time out to review and appropriate re-paraphrase sections of the article. Naturally, the (edited portion) of the article (yet incomplete) reads far, far better now. You also left a note on my talk page and left a few remarks and suggestions. With your permission, I will refer to those points and leave the final decision on only one or two points with you. I think majority of edits made by you have contributed to the article quality being better and there are absolutely no issues as far as I am concerned. The point was this (with reference to your re-paraphrasing):
Your second re-phrasing was:
Please see also the first sentence, where the phrase 'The tireless Parakramabahu' was also used by the author K.A.N.Sastri only, with the whole para being placed by me word by word.
Hi Akerans, Thanks for the assist on the references on Lutheran Evangelical Protestant Church page. That's much better. HIS2008 ( talk) 19:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
BS24 is on indefinite block for abusing multiple accounts. [1] This editor has had many socks and is likely to return under a new account. The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous ( talk) 17:49, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
It is noted that you altered the Ed Cunningham article on 3 November 2010 because of "This section needs to be rewritten without making claims from primary sources (i.e. youtube videos) and remarks from self published sources (i.e. my.journalstar.com).)" As per Wikipedia policy (shortcut WP:NEWSBLOG), newspaper blogs (huskerextra.com and journalstar.com are controlled by and owned by the Lincoln Journal-Star, which is the primary newspaper for Lincoln, NE) "are acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control." References 2 and 3 are factual articles. Reference 5 states specifically that the opinion stated is indeed an opinion. As per Wikipedia rules, the journalist's name is included. Furthermore, huskerextra.com and the journalstar.com are secondary sources ("second hand accounts, at least one step removed from an event. They rely for their material on primary sources, often making analytic or evaluative claims about them").
Also, a Youtube video that is taken directly from television (references 1 and 4) may not fit within the category of a primary source. Per Wikipedia, "primary sources are very close to an event, often accounts written by people who are directly involved, offering an insider's view of an event, a period of history, a work of art, a political discussion, and so on." (see Policy shortcut: WP:PSTS). In these cases, the Youtube videos are the actual events - not accounts written (or even talked about) by people who are directly involved, etc. Per Wikipedia, "primary sources are permitted if used carefully," and "all interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source...." These particular Youtube videos do not contain any "interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims" about the issue. Any claims, analyses, etc. contained in the Youtube videos ARE the issue. A similar example to this might be an article about State of the Union addresses that contains links to Youtube where the addresses have been posted without any extraneous commentary.
At most, the final sentence of the "Commentary Controversy" may arguably not fit within the rules and regulations of Wikipedia, but everything prior is permissible. If you have any suggestions on how to best phrase this, I would welcome your suggestions. Otherwise, I will look at ways to modify it so as to coincide with Wikipedia regulations (like the previous sentences). I would appreciate it if all prior sentences were not removed (although if there are better ways to word sentences, that could be beneficial), particularly as they fall within Wikipedia rules and regulations, as well as because they provide valuable information regarding a particular article on Wikipedia.
I used information at the following links on making the above assertions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SPS#Newspaper_and_magazine_blogs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOR#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources
Rouxinol ( talk) 20:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Look at this. The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous ( talk) 04:23, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the tips....appreciate it much —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srizvi82 ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello - just wondering why you removed mention of the sale of her house on the grounds that it was unsourced despite 1) a source being provided and 2) she's stated in many articles that she finds the upkeep too expensive. Andrew G. Doe ( talk) 16:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Akerans, regarding your revert [2], you may have not seen that none of my changes were in any sections the mediation and also my mediation statement is about. (If you want I can also clarify my mediation statement that it is only about the crowd section and lead regarding the crowd size.) Note that the article is not protected exactly for the reason that changes to other sections are valid. Do you have any issues with the content of my changes? If not I would put them in back. Thank you! 82.135.29.209 ( talk) 18:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I moved the discussion to Talk:Restoring_Honor_rally#Recent_changes_by_Arzel_and_Akerans, so please respond there. Thank you! 82.135.29.209 ( talk) 18:25, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Akerans, please note that it is not acceptable that you just delete a paragraph without giving any reason about what is wrong with the text. If you continue with such disruptive behavior, then there is no alternative to escalate and report this behavior to admins. I suggest that instead of just removing things you don't like it's a better idea to contribute constructively by adding information and improving existing information. I am of course open for any discussion and improvements of my contributions, but please use a constructive approach. Thank you! 82.135.29.209 ( talk) 21:38, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
When you haver a moment if you could look at my discussion page. Another editor is threatning me when I asked not to revert my edit without discussion. He also is wrong about consenus. A dicey topic as it is claimed by many people to stop discussion. thanks Basil rock ( talk) 20:57, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
This article i created was deleted back in the summer, as I was away from wikipedia for a long time I did not notice this happening. Yes it is fair that there is no notable online resources that covered the previous event. I will rectify this in getting resources saved for the one in 2011. But to re-instate the article is the evidence I will provide at the end of this comment suffice? It is a "draft" calendar for 2011 DTL clay shooting in the UK for championships, drafted by the UK governing body Clay Pigeon Shooting Association It clearly shows the location for the event in 2011 at Culbann C.P.C.
http://www.cpsa.co.uk/userfiles/file/Calendar2011.pdf
Thanks for any help. -- Weeman com ( talk) 19:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Weeman com ( talk) 18:00, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
I have a great concern in regards to user @Gabirro.
He seems somewhat disillusioned in regards to the nativity of the Angolan president. He also makes abruptly and slanderous claims in regards to José Eduardo dos Santos, his government and the Angolan people in general. Most of the links the user @Gabirro post on José Eduardo dos Santos’ Wikipedia page is sabotage and a direct violation of Wikipedia TOS.
( Bet2008 ( talk) 14:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)).
I have a great concern in regards to the perseverance of user @Gabirro. He/She continues to violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article in regards to José Eduardo dos Santos, his government and to the people of Angola in general.
( Bet2008 ( talk) 21:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC)).
Please update your listing for Eastern National. Their website has been updated, and there is incorrect information listed on the Wikipedia page. I see from the log that someone else attempted to update it, but you removed their entries.
Please visit www.easternnational.org to view the updated information. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.111.220.150 ( talk) 16:44, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
![]() | This user may have left Wikipedia. Akerans has not edited Wikipedia since December 2010. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
/Archive 1 |
A request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to Restoring Honor rally was recently filed. As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. The process of mediation is entirely voluntary and focuses exclusively on the content issues over which there is disagreement. Please review the request page and the guide to mediation requests and then indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate. Discussion relating to the mediation request welcome at the case talk page.
Thank you, AGK 21:35, 3 October 2010 (UTC)
All material on that article was used with permission from the owner of the company. They are contacting the wikipedia admins. Please give it some time. :)
Debolina Sengupta 21:15, 4 October 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Debolina Sengupta ( talk • contribs)
The request for mediation concerning Restoring Honor rally, to which you were are a party, has been accepted. Please watchlist the case page (which is where the mediation will take place). For guidance on accepted cases, refer to this resource. A mediator should be assigned to this dispute within two weeks. If you have any queries, please contact a Committee member or the mediation mailing list.
For the Mediation Committee,
AGK
19:45, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Message delivered by
MediationBot, on
behalf of the Mediation Committee.
Thank you for correcting my referencing on this page. I was online trying to work out how to reference things properly when you did it for me. Thanks a lot. Do you know how to add images? I haven't mastered that yet and would love to get the album art up for this album. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravenvenom ( talk • contribs) 05:22, 8 October 2010 (UTC)
Reply to your message on Rohatgi.
Read your reply and reread it again and again. I have posted reliable sources that show box-office collections and release dates of her B-grade sleazy films. In case you want to continue, then maybe a media article in the papers will show how her PR team is trying to falsify facts about her life and her work. Now, this is a PROPER warning. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hello5678 ( talk • contribs) 08:01, 9 October 2010 (UTC)
Greetings!
I have agreed to mediate the Restoring Honor case. I'm requesting that all parties start with opening statements, instructions are at the top of the page. Thanks for agreeing to go to mediation, I'm hopeful we can get this resolved to the satisfaction of all parties. Don't hesitate to contact me with any questions or issues. -- WGFinley ( talk) 00:52, 13 October 2010 (UTC)
Hi Akerans,
I removed three pictures of H.H. K'ung that were on his page. There were 4 pictures, one portrait of H.H. K'ung and three others all of which contained Adolph Hitler. H.H. K'ung was the Premier of China and held other posts such as the Head of the Central Bank and Minister of Finance. Just because he met with Hitler one time prior to World War II doesn't mean that he should be portrayed with Hitler in 75% of his pictures on Wikipedia. It's silly and misrepresents him. Why do you keep reversing it? Do I need to post some pictures of him with Churchil and Roosevelt and Chiang Kai-Chek? And if I wanted to do so, how would I do that? Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Gekung ( talk • contribs) 18:41, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
That would apply to the project page itself. So your point would be? The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous ( talk) 02:04, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
I, in error, tried to add/.alter a friend's page but changed my mind and tagged what I thought was my addition but I tagged his whole article because I did not know what I was doing I thought I was tagging any changes I made to be deleted. I messed up and will not try add to wikipedia again but would feel bad if he lost his page due to my error. Please revert to copy of article after my edits/tags. I did them at work so my ip address was not the same as my home IP. Can you revert to earlier version? Help I am so sorry Fixer789 ( talk) 19:24, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
I altered /Andrew james dubats earlier today and I did not even know I had to make a user account before I did it. I made this account after reading a bit but realised I am over my head and did not know how to fix my errors. Fixer789 ( talk) 19:32, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
I altered "Andrew james dubats" earlier today and I did not even know I had to make a user account before I did it. I thought I fixed it by tagging my keystrokes for deletion but instead tagged his page for deletion,( because I was at work and rushed and am an idiot)I made this account after reading a bit but realised I am over my head and did not know how to fix my errors. I do not want him to lose his page over my mistakes. Can his page be reverted to before my messing around? Fixer789 ( talk) 19:42, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
I now believe after reading your requirements think that he very well may meet the citeria for a low profile subject due to his interviews with music artists for Specs Howard. I feel very bad that my block deletion may be the reason for any problems with his page. I hope this is not the case. —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Fixer789 (
talk •
contribs)
20:02, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Thank you —Preceding
unsigned comment added by
Fixer789 (
talk •
contribs)
20:10, 15 October 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your proper formatting of that page. I am contributing info on that page with reliable sources. But I am very poor in editing, Sir. After placing text and saving the page I noticed that despite repeated efforts, the words Kulothunga Chola III have come in bold at four or five places. I cannot seem to correct the problem. Shall be grateful for your help and guidance.
Also in case you read that page you will find some paras repeating. This is to inform you that my edit of that page is not yet over. Some overview was added by me long time back, now I have books with me while editing. Broadly those repeats are original texts which have to be appropriately paraphrased quoting sources of info. I have also arrange those texts chronologically. As I proceed with the work, I will keep deleting the unwanted/unnecessary material. Till that time, let that (useless) text remain please, for it will help me with editing the page. Thanks.
Srirangam99 ( talk) 10:54, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
Srirangam99 ( talk) 04:38, 21 October 2010 (UTC)
Book Name: "A History of South India", K.A.Nilakanta Sastri, (2002)(Oxford University Press), page: 178 ISBN no. 0 19 560 686 8
Sir, thanks for your immense help in taking your time out to review and appropriate re-paraphrase sections of the article. Naturally, the (edited portion) of the article (yet incomplete) reads far, far better now. You also left a note on my talk page and left a few remarks and suggestions. With your permission, I will refer to those points and leave the final decision on only one or two points with you. I think majority of edits made by you have contributed to the article quality being better and there are absolutely no issues as far as I am concerned. The point was this (with reference to your re-paraphrasing):
Your second re-phrasing was:
Please see also the first sentence, where the phrase 'The tireless Parakramabahu' was also used by the author K.A.N.Sastri only, with the whole para being placed by me word by word.
Hi Akerans, Thanks for the assist on the references on Lutheran Evangelical Protestant Church page. That's much better. HIS2008 ( talk) 19:39, 23 October 2010 (UTC)
BS24 is on indefinite block for abusing multiple accounts. [1] This editor has had many socks and is likely to return under a new account. The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous ( talk) 17:49, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
It is noted that you altered the Ed Cunningham article on 3 November 2010 because of "This section needs to be rewritten without making claims from primary sources (i.e. youtube videos) and remarks from self published sources (i.e. my.journalstar.com).)" As per Wikipedia policy (shortcut WP:NEWSBLOG), newspaper blogs (huskerextra.com and journalstar.com are controlled by and owned by the Lincoln Journal-Star, which is the primary newspaper for Lincoln, NE) "are acceptable as sources so long as the writers are professionals and the blog is subject to the newspaper's full editorial control." References 2 and 3 are factual articles. Reference 5 states specifically that the opinion stated is indeed an opinion. As per Wikipedia rules, the journalist's name is included. Furthermore, huskerextra.com and the journalstar.com are secondary sources ("second hand accounts, at least one step removed from an event. They rely for their material on primary sources, often making analytic or evaluative claims about them").
Also, a Youtube video that is taken directly from television (references 1 and 4) may not fit within the category of a primary source. Per Wikipedia, "primary sources are very close to an event, often accounts written by people who are directly involved, offering an insider's view of an event, a period of history, a work of art, a political discussion, and so on." (see Policy shortcut: WP:PSTS). In these cases, the Youtube videos are the actual events - not accounts written (or even talked about) by people who are directly involved, etc. Per Wikipedia, "primary sources are permitted if used carefully," and "all interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims about primary sources must be referenced to a secondary source...." These particular Youtube videos do not contain any "interpretive claims, analyses, or synthetic claims" about the issue. Any claims, analyses, etc. contained in the Youtube videos ARE the issue. A similar example to this might be an article about State of the Union addresses that contains links to Youtube where the addresses have been posted without any extraneous commentary.
At most, the final sentence of the "Commentary Controversy" may arguably not fit within the rules and regulations of Wikipedia, but everything prior is permissible. If you have any suggestions on how to best phrase this, I would welcome your suggestions. Otherwise, I will look at ways to modify it so as to coincide with Wikipedia regulations (like the previous sentences). I would appreciate it if all prior sentences were not removed (although if there are better ways to word sentences, that could be beneficial), particularly as they fall within Wikipedia rules and regulations, as well as because they provide valuable information regarding a particular article on Wikipedia.
I used information at the following links on making the above assertions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:SPS#Newspaper_and_magazine_blogs http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOR#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources
Rouxinol ( talk) 20:22, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Look at this. The Artist AKA Mr Anonymous ( talk) 04:23, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Thank you very much for the tips....appreciate it much —Preceding unsigned comment added by Srizvi82 ( talk • contribs) 23:39, 7 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello - just wondering why you removed mention of the sale of her house on the grounds that it was unsourced despite 1) a source being provided and 2) she's stated in many articles that she finds the upkeep too expensive. Andrew G. Doe ( talk) 16:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi Akerans, regarding your revert [2], you may have not seen that none of my changes were in any sections the mediation and also my mediation statement is about. (If you want I can also clarify my mediation statement that it is only about the crowd section and lead regarding the crowd size.) Note that the article is not protected exactly for the reason that changes to other sections are valid. Do you have any issues with the content of my changes? If not I would put them in back. Thank you! 82.135.29.209 ( talk) 18:15, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
I moved the discussion to Talk:Restoring_Honor_rally#Recent_changes_by_Arzel_and_Akerans, so please respond there. Thank you! 82.135.29.209 ( talk) 18:25, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
Akerans, please note that it is not acceptable that you just delete a paragraph without giving any reason about what is wrong with the text. If you continue with such disruptive behavior, then there is no alternative to escalate and report this behavior to admins. I suggest that instead of just removing things you don't like it's a better idea to contribute constructively by adding information and improving existing information. I am of course open for any discussion and improvements of my contributions, but please use a constructive approach. Thank you! 82.135.29.209 ( talk) 21:38, 15 November 2010 (UTC)
When you haver a moment if you could look at my discussion page. Another editor is threatning me when I asked not to revert my edit without discussion. He also is wrong about consenus. A dicey topic as it is claimed by many people to stop discussion. thanks Basil rock ( talk) 20:57, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
This article i created was deleted back in the summer, as I was away from wikipedia for a long time I did not notice this happening. Yes it is fair that there is no notable online resources that covered the previous event. I will rectify this in getting resources saved for the one in 2011. But to re-instate the article is the evidence I will provide at the end of this comment suffice? It is a "draft" calendar for 2011 DTL clay shooting in the UK for championships, drafted by the UK governing body Clay Pigeon Shooting Association It clearly shows the location for the event in 2011 at Culbann C.P.C.
http://www.cpsa.co.uk/userfiles/file/Calendar2011.pdf
Thanks for any help. -- Weeman com ( talk) 19:08, 27 November 2010 (UTC)
Weeman com ( talk) 18:00, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
I have a great concern in regards to user @Gabirro.
He seems somewhat disillusioned in regards to the nativity of the Angolan president. He also makes abruptly and slanderous claims in regards to José Eduardo dos Santos, his government and the Angolan people in general. Most of the links the user @Gabirro post on José Eduardo dos Santos’ Wikipedia page is sabotage and a direct violation of Wikipedia TOS.
( Bet2008 ( talk) 14:12, 27 December 2010 (UTC)).
I have a great concern in regards to the perseverance of user @Gabirro. He/She continues to violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory or otherwise controversial content into an article in regards to José Eduardo dos Santos, his government and to the people of Angola in general.
( Bet2008 ( talk) 21:33, 27 December 2010 (UTC)).
Please update your listing for Eastern National. Their website has been updated, and there is incorrect information listed on the Wikipedia page. I see from the log that someone else attempted to update it, but you removed their entries.
Please visit www.easternnational.org to view the updated information. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.111.220.150 ( talk) 16:44, 31 January 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
14:22, 24 November 2015 (UTC)