Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. 1.157.62.240 ( talk) 06:40, 13 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Snow Day (2022 film), you may be blocked from editing. 2001:8003:1D9D:3B00:9D1F:3B84:2A98:468E ( talk) 23:33, 16 February 2024 (UTC) reply

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Snow Day (2022 film). This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 23:40, 16 February 2024 (UTC) reply

Your edit to Belva Davis has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. –  Muboshgu ( talk) 19:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC) reply

Please do not add or change content, as you did at KRON-TV, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mvcg66b3r ( talk) 16:26, 25 April 2024 (UTC) reply

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of most-viewed Indian YouTube videos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Punjabi.

( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:54, 7 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft or article is about an unreleased film. The film notability guideline identifies three stages in the production cycle for films:

• 1. Planned films that have not begun production ( principal photography or animation). These planned films do not satisfy film notability.
• 2. Films that are confirmed by reliable sources to have begun production, but have not been released. These films are only notable if production itself satisfies general notability in terms of significant coverage. Mere mention of the start of production does not satisfy notability.
• 3. Films that have been released, whose notability is determined by reception and reviews, or a major notable award for excellence in some aspect of filmmaking.

This film page must be evaluated based on general notability of production.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:No Time to Spy: A Loud House Movie and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Hello, Akandkur! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon ( talk) 05:23, 24 May 2024 (UTC) reply

Why did you make the old Disney Junior logo free? Another extended confirmed user, please switch back to the non-free one, which is File:Disney Junior.svg. 2603:7000:B800:3400:D863:20AE:1D17:199F ( talk) 00:44, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Please stop making fair use stuff free, or you will be blocked indefinitely. 2603:7000:B800:3400:D863:20AE:1D17:199F ( talk) 00:48, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Please stop. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Disney Junior, you may be blocked from editing. 2603:7000:B800:3400:D863:20AE:1D17:199F ( talk) 00:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC) reply

I don't care how right you claim to be. No Time To Spy: A Loud House Movie is a film produced by Nickelodeon Movies. It is clearly evident in both the opening and closing logos of the film (both on Paramount+ and the Nickelodeon broadcast), AND in the end credits of the film. You need to stop. This editing conflict is painfully annoying from you, and you aren't really doing us any favors. If this continues, you may be blocked from editing. Multiplivision ( talk) 17:10, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Well, did you look at IMDb for proof? It shows as Nickelodeon Productions since it aired on TV. Akhil K. ( talk) 17:24, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Do you seriously think IMDb is going to have the most proper information? IMDb is loitered with false information. Multiplivision ( talk) 17:26, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

The edits I've done to those isn't painfully annoying from me. How is it to you? Akhil K. ( talk) 17:27, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Just stop with the annoying edits. Multiplivision ( talk) 17:29, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Fine. Akhil K. ( talk) 17:30, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply

Thank you. Multiplivision ( talk) 17:35, 23 June 2024 (UTC) reply