Hi, and welcome to my talk page. I have a few rules:
Thanks, Ai y da 20:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, AlysTarr, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on
my talk page. Or, please come to the
new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here!
Hersfold (
talk/
work) 18:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Alys! I saw that you used my Protestant userbox (thanks); it's always nice to see another Christian out there! -- P.B. Pilhet 23:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Curses! Your user page just made me lose the game. Again. Anyway...
Thanks for uploading Image:Aiydasandbox.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Test
I was just doing my job :) Take care! -- Emc² • contact me 17:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I am getting envious -- you have been here only for a few months, and your page has already been vandalized a zillion times. How come you are so popular, and I am not? -- Aleph-4 17:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you! I am thrilled to be adopted. (Someone actually likes me!)
I hope I will make you proud..
-- Witchzilla 19:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report about 72.240.61.138 ( talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. ·· coel acan 17:32, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
It's cool. =) Keep up the recent changes patrol. ·· coel acan 18:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
The
Person Who Keeps blanking [
[1]] Has Struck Again.
Just Thought You Should Know.
See
Speak
Pray
Hey on the users talk page when you press edit there should be 1,2,3,4 tabs with all the reasons! Its all on WP:TW somewhere! Andy talk 21:55, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Naraht and AphiO1925 are wile-wiki-users and belongs to a friendly mission fraternity. Why they are doing things in changing and reverting of shared ideas on discussion page of Tau Gamma Phi article?
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:38, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
You sent me a message concerning editing the entry on Nuweiba (Egypt). The URL is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuweiba. You said it was not a "constructive" edit. I suspect this was an automatic message based on me removing an entire section (albeit a very short one consisting on one short paragraph). I think my edit was constructive. The section talks about "archaeological developments" claiming that some "historians" now believe that Red Sea crossing took place there. But that whole thing is based on the ideas of Ron Wyatt, who is neither an archaeologist nor an historian. So there is nothing tangible in that whole section and wikipedia would be well advised to allow it to be removed. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.111.254 ( talk) 15:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
With reference to your removal of a link I posted on Nadine Dorries MP's page, your edit was as follows: (cur | prev) 19:31, 14 August 2011 Aiyda (talk | contribs) (34,786 bytes) (→Abstinence and child sex abuse: No fan of Dorries *at all* but we can't just mention random blogs which attack her) The point of this reference was to site informed criticism of Dorries's comments, the blogger mentioned, who's post received national press coverage at the time, is a victim of childhood sexual abuse, and is therefore quite qualified to attack these remarks. Although you may not be a "fan" of Dorries the version that has my link removed has NO informed criticism at all for these obscene remarks, hardly fair, eh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toss.er live ( talk • contribs)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome to my talk page. I have a few rules:
Thanks, Ai y da 20:59, 17 January 2008 (UTC)
Hello, AlysTarr, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.
If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on
my talk page. Or, please come to the
new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
We're so glad you're here!
Hersfold (
talk/
work) 18:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Hi, Alys! I saw that you used my Protestant userbox (thanks); it's always nice to see another Christian out there! -- P.B. Pilhet 23:42, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Curses! Your user page just made me lose the game. Again. Anyway...
Thanks for uploading Image:Aiydasandbox.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.
For more information on using images, see the following pages:
This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:04, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
Test
I was just doing my job :) Take care! -- Emc² • contact me 17:50, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
I am getting envious -- you have been here only for a few months, and your page has already been vandalized a zillion times. How come you are so popular, and I am not? -- Aleph-4 17:16, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you, Thank you, Thank you! I am thrilled to be adopted. (Someone actually likes me!)
I hope I will make you proud..
-- Witchzilla 19:16, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for making a report about 72.240.61.138 ( talk · contribs · block log) on Wikipedia:Administrator intervention against vandalism. Reporting and removing vandalism is vital to the functioning of Wikipedia and all users are encouraged to revert, warn, and report vandalism. However, administrators are generally only able to block users if they have received a recent final warning (one that mentions that the user may be blocked) and they have recently vandalized after that warning was given. The reported user has not yet been blocked because it appears this has not occurred yet. If this user continues to vandalize even after their final warning, please report them to the AIV noticeboard again. Thank you. ·· coel acan 17:32, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
It's cool. =) Keep up the recent changes patrol. ·· coel acan 18:19, 27 April 2007 (UTC)
The
Person Who Keeps blanking [
[1]] Has Struck Again.
Just Thought You Should Know.
See
Speak
Pray
Hey on the users talk page when you press edit there should be 1,2,3,4 tabs with all the reasons! Its all on WP:TW somewhere! Andy talk 21:55, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
Naraht and AphiO1925 are wile-wiki-users and belongs to a friendly mission fraternity. Why they are doing things in changing and reverting of shared ideas on discussion page of Tau Gamma Phi article?
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. PeterSymonds (talk) 21:38, 15 June 2008 (UTC)
You sent me a message concerning editing the entry on Nuweiba (Egypt). The URL is http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuweiba. You said it was not a "constructive" edit. I suspect this was an automatic message based on me removing an entire section (albeit a very short one consisting on one short paragraph). I think my edit was constructive. The section talks about "archaeological developments" claiming that some "historians" now believe that Red Sea crossing took place there. But that whole thing is based on the ideas of Ron Wyatt, who is neither an archaeologist nor an historian. So there is nothing tangible in that whole section and wikipedia would be well advised to allow it to be removed. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.17.111.254 ( talk) 15:03, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
With reference to your removal of a link I posted on Nadine Dorries MP's page, your edit was as follows: (cur | prev) 19:31, 14 August 2011 Aiyda (talk | contribs) (34,786 bytes) (→Abstinence and child sex abuse: No fan of Dorries *at all* but we can't just mention random blogs which attack her) The point of this reference was to site informed criticism of Dorries's comments, the blogger mentioned, who's post received national press coverage at the time, is a victim of childhood sexual abuse, and is therefore quite qualified to attack these remarks. Although you may not be a "fan" of Dorries the version that has my link removed has NO informed criticism at all for these obscene remarks, hardly fair, eh? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Toss.er live ( talk • contribs)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)