This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
No rescue squad, just me and Thaddeus. I had brought this article back from deletion with only 2 sources and I built it to what it is now. This is only my second article and first Afd argument. I feel snowballed but the non-nonsensical arguments of Epbr123 and Hullaballoo and very frustrated that certain key policies, especially concerning interviews are primary sources, need to be changed. - Stillwaterising ( talk) 05:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I think the odds are in your favor, but there might be an appeal seeing how lengthy and heated the discussion has gone on. Good luck! Airplaneman talk 05:47, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello airplaneman,and thank you for welcoming me to wiki! I have 2 questions and i'm hoping to get some answers.1 could you please show me how to edit my user page? 2 Could you also show me how to design my user page? Thank you and again,thank you for welcoming me to wiki! 7oh!7 ( talk) 14:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)7oh!7
Hope you don't mind, but I've removed your speedy on Fustiballus (see also Fustibalus). Seems the previous editor was confused with their own tagging of it and broke the template. How it ought to read is as it currently is, a redirect to cope with accidental mis-spellings. Clearly not G2 material.
If you disagree, of course feel free to re-tag it. Andy Dingley ( talk) 16:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome. I thank HotCat! :D Airplaneman talk 17:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on "pedro fiorito", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dorieo( talk) 18:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Can you review The Tide for me? Also, does the article To Plant a Seed need the cleanup and rewrite tags?
-- ŁσςhĢσσbïï ( talk) 18:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. I'll see if I can get more references. -- ŁσςhĢσσbïï ( talk) 18:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
One more thing, please! Does the article The Great I Am need the tags at the top? Thank you so much Mr. Airplaneman! -- ŁσςhĢσσbïï ( talk) 19:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
You know, it might help if you'd wait a bit after an article was created before making the sort of edits you did to that article. I'd just put it aside to get some information I needed and you waded in and made some ridiculous edits. For example, I'd put in [[ in music|]] with the intent to get the precise year, and you changed it to [[In Music]], as if there was an intent to link to an article called "In Music"! And what's worse, you put that in AFTER I FOUND the proper year. Also, you put in {{stub}} when there was a more appropriate stub type to use, and {{unreferenced}} just because I hadn't finished the article yet, so references had not yet been added! If you'd waited more than the less than a minute you did before editing, I wouldn't have had to revert most of what you did! – BRG ( talk) 19:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Airplaneman, thank you very much for your message. Unfortunately I know very little English. I simply translate articles into Spanish and little else. Greetings.-- Dorieo ( talk) 17:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
from the category description: This category should not contain any redirects itself; there are so many of them that a category of them all would be unmanageable – I reverted your addition of Category:Redirects to a redirect I was watching. If you think it makes sense to add those for some reason, please change the description of the category first (possibly after discussion). Take care, and have fun! -- Alvestrand ( talk) 06:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Instead of hitting the minus sign to remove a category, hit the plus sign the way you would if you just wanted to make a minor spelling correction — and then completely replace the old category you want to remove with the new one you want to add. For instance, in , I expanded "reality television participants", but then replaced that text with "Participants in American reality television series" before hitting save. Bearcat ( talk) 08:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
I've actually been a member for about 3 1/2 years now – I didn't realise welcoming was a thing that happened! :-) I don't do much editing though, I must admit. I'll read the articles you suggested – they look useful. Thanks again! ClinkingDog ( talk) 15:18, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
So, I started working a little on Nico's article and I'll probably do a lot more when I'm on break. Can you give me a few suggestions for improvement on the article? Other than, of course, basic grammatical fixes. I tried to rework the Last Olympian section this afternoon because the end of that summary made absolutely no sense. Thanks! PrincessofLlyr ( talk) 01:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
OK. This is really hard to explain, so I'll provide the diff. Instead of writing the same reference twice, you can give it a name and just provide the name in other places which use the same reference. That's where the a b c d etc. blue links that sometimes show up in a reflist come from-multiple citations of the same reference. I'll continue looking! Airplaneman talk 05:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Overload! I think I'll have to keep reading and messing around before I fully comprehend all of it. I looked at what you did on Nico, makes perfect sense. It might just take a couple practice edits before I actually get it right! As for Briares, does that mean we should add it to the list? I'll see what I can do about the in-universe stuff on Nico, although I have to agree that that's probably one of the things I'm not as good at. I'm not sure how much I'll get done this weekend (weekends are crazy for me), but I'll keep working whenever I have time. Thanks for the help! PrincessofLlyr ( talk) 18:04, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I thought of another question. Does an article automatically upgrade (say, to C-class) or does it have to be reviewed or something? Oh, and I hope you feel better soon. Not that I would mind a day off school...but I think most people dislike being sick! Thanks! PrincessofLlyr ( talk) 19:15, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Dear Airplaneman, Many thanks for the words of encouragement, always well received, especially by this newbie! I am writing in the hope you can help me resolve the current issue I have with the Wendy McMurdo page, having exhausted my limited abilities to ensure the removal (so far) of the banner at the top of her page which says currently "This biography of a living person does not cite any references or sources ... etc". Her notability isn't in question, and the references I have used, are all entirely verifiable, being as they are almost entirely in the public arena, eg internationally published books, internationally held exhibitions with other famous (and verifiable) artists, or long published media such as mute. May I presume the banner remains at present as I have incorrectly posted the information, rather than the information being considered to be less than sufficient for meeting the wiki standards for notability or verification? Eitherway, I would be very grateful to receive your help in ensuring the correctness of the information presented in wikipedia, and look forward to hearing from you in due course. With thanks and kind regards Roboticus2 ( talk) 17:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Check |isbn=
value: length (
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Dear Airplaneman, fantastic, really appreciate the work you've put in, the page looks perfect! I'll have a go at citing the books inline as you say, over the next few days, and eitherway very grateful for your help! Kind regards, Roboticus2 ( talk) 09:55, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Bell River Complex is a copyvio from http://www.sfu.ca/mdd/gangue/Gangue65.pdf, please have a look.-- Stone ( talk) 22:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.
There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #9. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know. --NBahn ( talk) 04:55, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
did you edit my bmets page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goffy3 ( talk • contribs) 15:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
I noticed on your userpage that you play the violin, but you don't have the violinist userbox! If you want it, here it is:
{{ User violin}}
{{ User violin-1}}
{{ User violin-2}}
{{ User violin-3}}
{{ User violin-4}}
levels by adding -1 -2 -3 -4 to the end. Play well!-- fetch comms ☛ 00:16, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome. I really appreciate it. Yuan Lin ( talk) 21:18, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
When you have a lot of information from the same website, do you place the reference at the end of each sentence or at the end of all the information from that source? Yuan Lin ( talk) 21:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
“ | A good thing to use is "ref tools". Enable it by:
|
” |
It really helps a lot. By the way, I noticed that you made some changes to my new article Prelude in C minor, BWV 999. Thanks! :) Oh, and by the way, if you go to an article called The 39 Clues, you might find a lot of grammar mistakes. I haven't had time myself to correct them. Could you please do it for me? Yuan Lin ( talk) 23:01, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I think this might interest you. There's a group that is dedicated to improving articles that are about Classical Music. Just go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Classical music/Compositions task force. At the middle of the article there is list of members (you'll see my name there). add #, a space, and three tides at the bottom of the list on the edit page and you're in the club! :)
Please do not use correction scripts on any page that is not in the article namespace (that is, the name has nothing before the beginning of the name like [[Albert Einstein]], or has just a colon, like [[:Albert Einstein]]. This is because such pages may have deliberate errors that are used to show what users ought not do.
Also, please do not change html entities that start with an ampersand and end with a semicolon into characters, because some of these characters look nearly identical in some fonts, and editors can't tell what they are. -- Jc3s5h ( talk) 01:31, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm back again! Could you take a look at this, please? #36, the part about the Companion books. (I can't figure out how to add that into the link. Any suggestions?) Thanks! PrincessofLlyr ( talk) 03:07, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for signing and fixing the # thingy! I had started it before learning about that Wikitext function thingy and then forgot to change it. Thanks again :D fetch comms ☛ 23:38, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
You could assign a bot, like User:MiszaBot II to automatically archive talk pages. Extremepro ( talk) 11:56, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Airplaneman, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have changed a page you tagged ( Last Man Standing - The Drinking Game) from being tagged for speedy deletion to being tagged for proposed deletion. The speedy deletion criteria are very narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks again! JohnCD ( talk) 21:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I was able to find references to expand Saint Nicholas Society in the City of New York, which you had tagged for speedy deletion. I think that notability is now clear. – Eastmain ( talk) 03:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to wikiproject warriors!
As the other memebers appear to be inactive, I have taken it upon my self to welcome you.
Anyways, thanks for joining, and I'm sure you can help me a lot, since I'm still a fairly new user.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 03:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
I think you noticed this on the character list page, but its on every page: the ord priority is used instead of importance, so none of the pages have an importance rating. I started fixing them, but its kind of tedious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brambleclawx ( talk • contribs) 03:59, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, actually, I've put a suggestion for it to be merged on that page. and is there any sort of gadget that will remind me to sign my posts, cuz i forget a lot Brambleclawx ( talk) 23:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm fine with the rainbow border you made, but the green you chose is a bit blinding/distracting, so maybe choose a lighter green...? Brambleclawx ( talk) 21:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Never mind, I did it myself. Brambleclawx ( talk) 23:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
This is what I envision as the current characters page after I finish the split, but I need help adding citations.
List of characters in the Warriors novel series
Brambleclawx ( talk) 20:01, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Good idea
Brambleclawx (
talk)
20:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I was looking over all the other pages, and I'm realising that a lot of links (on the pages themselves, and on other warriors pages), will need to be fixed. Brambleclawx ( talk) 17:08, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I've gotta admit: even though I'm a year older than you, your organisation skills are a lot better than mine. So yeah, I'll move it in by next weekend, as long as nothing weird comes up and delays me. I'm actually spending a lot of time now trying to cite sources: most of the character pages cited nothing, so i went and cited all the relevant books. As I said before, I don't mind you editing those pages, since I know you will not try to vandalise it. So if you have time, you can help me cite the books. usually I cite like this: <ref name=booknameorsimplifiedbookname> Hunter, Erin. (200X) ''[[Bookname (Warriors)|Bookname]]'' (number of pages)pp. </ref>. some of the ref names i've used are: intothewild, moonrise, and catsotc (otc stands for of the clans). That way, afterwards, I just have to type <ref name=bookname></ref>. but I suppose you already knew how to do that.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 22:58, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Oh. I didn't know that. Thanks. and by the way, don't bother putting a tb template on my page: I have this page in my watchlist.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 23:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Well, the issue is that most of them have few or no citations, so they might be subjected to deletion. So if you could add some citations first, sure. Brambleclawx ( talk) 00:09, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
apparently, you need to put a copied template on it to give credit to the original contributors. Brambleclawx ( talk) 00:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Er... well i was talking to an admin about it... lemme see... its here. And there, I'm directed to read Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 01:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for doing that, I really appreciate it. Brambleclawx ( talk) 01:24, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
I have now moved the pages into the mainspace: I would like you to add citations for the tribe page and the cats outside clans page.
I will also begin to fix links Brambleclawx ( talk) 00:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Hey, do you believe me when I say the cat on the cover of Twilight is Crowfeather? 'Cuz there's some editor who keeps changing it to Cinderpelt even though I have put proof for it in a hidden comment. Brambleclawx ( talk) 02:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Do you think its necessary to make searches of ThunderClan, WindClan, etc. become redirects? and apparently, if you search "shadowclan", you immediately arrive on a page about an MMORPG. Brambleclawx ( talk) 01:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I made the redirects for River, Sky and Wind clans, but i dunno how to do the shadowclan one. Also, creation of a new page called "ThunderClan" is currently protected from re-creation, cuz its been deleted 7 times under that name, and 4 times under the name "list of ThunderClan cats, and im not sure if its a wise idea to bring this up with editors, since they've deleted this page about 11 times in the past, and im not sure if this could be deleted under WP:CSD#G4. anyways, if you could do the ShadowClan one, I'd appreciate it. also, I don't know if its necessary to immediately redirect seraches of Tribe of Rushing Water to the warriors article, since i have no idea if this might actually point to another article.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 23:48, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I've talked to an admin, and i now have old versions of those pages under my userpage:
User:Brambleclawx/List of ThunderClan Cats, User:Brambleclawx/List of RiverClan Cats, User:Brambleclawx/List of WindClan Cats, User:Brambleclawx/List of ShadowClan Cats, and User:Brambleclawx/List of SkyClan Cats.
From what I can tell, the new pages should be safe from Wikipedia:CSD#G4, since they are substantially different from what they were before. The only one that worries me is the SkyClan page, which still looks very much like it did before. My idea is this: transfer the information listed in the old deleted article (accessible through the link i gave) about the old SkyClan cats (the ones that got driven out), then add a minor characters table like the other Clan pages. And do you feel there might be an issue with self-Published sources? uz its kinda hard to find any other source relating to warriors...
Brambleclawx ( talk) 20:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Great!
In case you didnt notice yet, we've lost one more WikiProject Warriors member to the inactive list: Bramblestar (ShadowClan Leader), his reasoning being this.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 21:57, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Well, actually, that guy was previously listed under "Possibly Inactive", so he didnt get a role call message, and since he was active, i decided to contact him. I have left a message for TakaraLioness, who, if im not mistaken, is the single editor who has edited the Warriors page the most.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 22:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Sure. I've done that now to redirects for the plays and short stories. Brambleclawx ( talk) 21:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
I've been looking over some Wikipedia guidleines: I am so sure that Night Whispers (Warriors) is going to get deleted, since Wikipedia discourages articles about unreleased books, and there's virtually no information on the page at the moment, because there really isn't much we can put on the page... ideas?
All the book specific pages probably need an overhaul as well: Wikipedia also does not like pages that are bascially just plot summaries.
And I'm still working on grammar and spelling for all pages. I think by January, Warriors (novel series) might be ready for nomination for GA status. Brambleclawx ( talk) 02:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
An easy way is to find one page that lists critiques for the book, and search that reviewer for reviews on the other books as well. Brambleclawx ( talk) 02:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Oh. I know you're probably just as busy as i am, but if you have time, i'd like your help making all the references on Warriors (novel series) use the same format. It looks neater, and its easier to cite. also, some people cited the book description pages on HarperCollins and amazon instead of the book itself. That probably needs fixing. But I guess this will take time, since we're both busy with school. If I had more time, I could probably do it quite quickly. But I'll really appreciate help with this. Brambleclawx ( talk) 03:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Airplaneman, thanks for the message. The Dell Adamo comment read to me as more like trivia and seemed out of place in the MacBook Air article. It's interesting no doubt, but I didn't get the impression it really belonged, which is why I removed it. I also feel the phrasing, "At the time of release, Apple described…" was enough to imply that there would be obvious future contesters for 'thinnest laptop' status. If you specifically mention Dell Adamo, does that mean any thinner laptops in the future will also need to be listed there alongside? EssentialParadox ( talk) 00:47, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Airplaneman. In reviewing CSD nominations, I have noted that two of your recent nominations (Pimpinela and S dnem rozhdeniya Vika) sucked (i.e. were not in accordance with policy). Please be more careful when tagging other contributors' work for speedy deletion. We're getting a bad rep (e.g., the WSJ front page article earlier this week) because of reflexive actions such as the ones you took. -- Y not? 15:30, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
...very much for your kind welcome on my talk page. Your link collection is indeed very helpful. Thanks, -- Firefly's luciferase ( talk) 00:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I accept your adoption program. I was kind of adopted before, but my adoptee turned semi-retired. Anyway, thanks for the offer and get in touch. VTomi ( talk) 20:18, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Note: Significant changes have been made to the article being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concerto in G Major since your last comments. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 00:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
No rescue squad, just me and Thaddeus. I had brought this article back from deletion with only 2 sources and I built it to what it is now. This is only my second article and first Afd argument. I feel snowballed but the non-nonsensical arguments of Epbr123 and Hullaballoo and very frustrated that certain key policies, especially concerning interviews are primary sources, need to be changed. - Stillwaterising ( talk) 05:13, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
I think the odds are in your favor, but there might be an appeal seeing how lengthy and heated the discussion has gone on. Good luck! Airplaneman talk 05:47, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello airplaneman,and thank you for welcoming me to wiki! I have 2 questions and i'm hoping to get some answers.1 could you please show me how to edit my user page? 2 Could you also show me how to design my user page? Thank you and again,thank you for welcoming me to wiki! 7oh!7 ( talk) 14:16, 9 November 2009 (UTC)7oh!7
Hope you don't mind, but I've removed your speedy on Fustiballus (see also Fustibalus). Seems the previous editor was confused with their own tagging of it and broke the template. How it ought to read is as it currently is, a redirect to cope with accidental mis-spellings. Clearly not G2 material.
If you disagree, of course feel free to re-tag it. Andy Dingley ( talk) 16:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome. I thank HotCat! :D Airplaneman talk 17:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on "pedro fiorito", requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{
hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on
the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dorieo( talk) 18:22, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Can you review The Tide for me? Also, does the article To Plant a Seed need the cleanup and rewrite tags?
-- ŁσςhĢσσbïï ( talk) 18:39, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Thank you. I'll see if I can get more references. -- ŁσςhĢσσbïï ( talk) 18:50, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
One more thing, please! Does the article The Great I Am need the tags at the top? Thank you so much Mr. Airplaneman! -- ŁσςhĢσσbïï ( talk) 19:05, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
You know, it might help if you'd wait a bit after an article was created before making the sort of edits you did to that article. I'd just put it aside to get some information I needed and you waded in and made some ridiculous edits. For example, I'd put in [[ in music|]] with the intent to get the precise year, and you changed it to [[In Music]], as if there was an intent to link to an article called "In Music"! And what's worse, you put that in AFTER I FOUND the proper year. Also, you put in {{stub}} when there was a more appropriate stub type to use, and {{unreferenced}} just because I hadn't finished the article yet, so references had not yet been added! If you'd waited more than the less than a minute you did before editing, I wouldn't have had to revert most of what you did! – BRG ( talk) 19:36, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
Hi Airplaneman, thank you very much for your message. Unfortunately I know very little English. I simply translate articles into Spanish and little else. Greetings.-- Dorieo ( talk) 17:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
from the category description: This category should not contain any redirects itself; there are so many of them that a category of them all would be unmanageable – I reverted your addition of Category:Redirects to a redirect I was watching. If you think it makes sense to add those for some reason, please change the description of the category first (possibly after discussion). Take care, and have fun! -- Alvestrand ( talk) 06:26, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
Instead of hitting the minus sign to remove a category, hit the plus sign the way you would if you just wanted to make a minor spelling correction — and then completely replace the old category you want to remove with the new one you want to add. For instance, in , I expanded "reality television participants", but then replaced that text with "Participants in American reality television series" before hitting save. Bearcat ( talk) 08:05, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
I've actually been a member for about 3 1/2 years now – I didn't realise welcoming was a thing that happened! :-) I don't do much editing though, I must admit. I'll read the articles you suggested – they look useful. Thanks again! ClinkingDog ( talk) 15:18, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
So, I started working a little on Nico's article and I'll probably do a lot more when I'm on break. Can you give me a few suggestions for improvement on the article? Other than, of course, basic grammatical fixes. I tried to rework the Last Olympian section this afternoon because the end of that summary made absolutely no sense. Thanks! PrincessofLlyr ( talk) 01:58, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
OK. This is really hard to explain, so I'll provide the diff. Instead of writing the same reference twice, you can give it a name and just provide the name in other places which use the same reference. That's where the a b c d etc. blue links that sometimes show up in a reflist come from-multiple citations of the same reference. I'll continue looking! Airplaneman talk 05:26, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Overload! I think I'll have to keep reading and messing around before I fully comprehend all of it. I looked at what you did on Nico, makes perfect sense. It might just take a couple practice edits before I actually get it right! As for Briares, does that mean we should add it to the list? I'll see what I can do about the in-universe stuff on Nico, although I have to agree that that's probably one of the things I'm not as good at. I'm not sure how much I'll get done this weekend (weekends are crazy for me), but I'll keep working whenever I have time. Thanks for the help! PrincessofLlyr ( talk) 18:04, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
I thought of another question. Does an article automatically upgrade (say, to C-class) or does it have to be reviewed or something? Oh, and I hope you feel better soon. Not that I would mind a day off school...but I think most people dislike being sick! Thanks! PrincessofLlyr ( talk) 19:15, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Dear Airplaneman, Many thanks for the words of encouragement, always well received, especially by this newbie! I am writing in the hope you can help me resolve the current issue I have with the Wendy McMurdo page, having exhausted my limited abilities to ensure the removal (so far) of the banner at the top of her page which says currently "This biography of a living person does not cite any references or sources ... etc". Her notability isn't in question, and the references I have used, are all entirely verifiable, being as they are almost entirely in the public arena, eg internationally published books, internationally held exhibitions with other famous (and verifiable) artists, or long published media such as mute. May I presume the banner remains at present as I have incorrectly posted the information, rather than the information being considered to be less than sufficient for meeting the wiki standards for notability or verification? Eitherway, I would be very grateful to receive your help in ensuring the correctness of the information presented in wikipedia, and look forward to hearing from you in due course. With thanks and kind regards Roboticus2 ( talk) 17:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
{{
cite book}}
: Check |isbn=
value: length (
help); Unknown parameter |coauthors=
ignored (|author=
suggested) (
help)
Dear Airplaneman, fantastic, really appreciate the work you've put in, the page looks perfect! I'll have a go at citing the books inline as you say, over the next few days, and eitherway very grateful for your help! Kind regards, Roboticus2 ( talk) 09:55, 14 November 2009 (UTC)
Bell River Complex is a copyvio from http://www.sfu.ca/mdd/gangue/Gangue65.pdf, please have a look.-- Stone ( talk) 22:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
You are receiving this message either because you received a similar one before and didn't object, or you requested to receive a similar one in the future.
There is a planning discussion taking place here for DC Meetup #9. If you don't wish to receive this message again, please let me know. --NBahn ( talk) 04:55, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
did you edit my bmets page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Goffy3 ( talk • contribs) 15:36, 21 November 2009 (UTC)
I noticed on your userpage that you play the violin, but you don't have the violinist userbox! If you want it, here it is:
{{ User violin}}
{{ User violin-1}}
{{ User violin-2}}
{{ User violin-3}}
{{ User violin-4}}
levels by adding -1 -2 -3 -4 to the end. Play well!-- fetch comms ☛ 00:16, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for the welcome. I really appreciate it. Yuan Lin ( talk) 21:18, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
When you have a lot of information from the same website, do you place the reference at the end of each sentence or at the end of all the information from that source? Yuan Lin ( talk) 21:52, 22 November 2009 (UTC)
“ | A good thing to use is "ref tools". Enable it by:
|
” |
It really helps a lot. By the way, I noticed that you made some changes to my new article Prelude in C minor, BWV 999. Thanks! :) Oh, and by the way, if you go to an article called The 39 Clues, you might find a lot of grammar mistakes. I haven't had time myself to correct them. Could you please do it for me? Yuan Lin ( talk) 23:01, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I think this might interest you. There's a group that is dedicated to improving articles that are about Classical Music. Just go to Wikipedia:WikiProject Classical music/Compositions task force. At the middle of the article there is list of members (you'll see my name there). add #, a space, and three tides at the bottom of the list on the edit page and you're in the club! :)
Please do not use correction scripts on any page that is not in the article namespace (that is, the name has nothing before the beginning of the name like [[Albert Einstein]], or has just a colon, like [[:Albert Einstein]]. This is because such pages may have deliberate errors that are used to show what users ought not do.
Also, please do not change html entities that start with an ampersand and end with a semicolon into characters, because some of these characters look nearly identical in some fonts, and editors can't tell what they are. -- Jc3s5h ( talk) 01:31, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm back again! Could you take a look at this, please? #36, the part about the Companion books. (I can't figure out how to add that into the link. Any suggestions?) Thanks! PrincessofLlyr ( talk) 03:07, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for signing and fixing the # thingy! I had started it before learning about that Wikitext function thingy and then forgot to change it. Thanks again :D fetch comms ☛ 23:38, 23 November 2009 (UTC)
You could assign a bot, like User:MiszaBot II to automatically archive talk pages. Extremepro ( talk) 11:56, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Airplaneman, and thanks for your work patrolling new changes. I am just informing you that I have changed a page you tagged ( Last Man Standing - The Drinking Game) from being tagged for speedy deletion to being tagged for proposed deletion. The speedy deletion criteria are very narrow to protect the encyclopedia, and do not fit the page in question. Please review the criteria for speedy deletion before tagging further pages. If you have any questions or problems, please let me know. Thanks again! JohnCD ( talk) 21:10, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
I was able to find references to expand Saint Nicholas Society in the City of New York, which you had tagged for speedy deletion. I think that notability is now clear. – Eastmain ( talk) 03:01, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to wikiproject warriors!
As the other memebers appear to be inactive, I have taken it upon my self to welcome you.
Anyways, thanks for joining, and I'm sure you can help me a lot, since I'm still a fairly new user.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 03:30, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
I think you noticed this on the character list page, but its on every page: the ord priority is used instead of importance, so none of the pages have an importance rating. I started fixing them, but its kind of tedious. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brambleclawx ( talk • contribs) 03:59, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
Yeah, actually, I've put a suggestion for it to be merged on that page. and is there any sort of gadget that will remind me to sign my posts, cuz i forget a lot Brambleclawx ( talk) 23:42, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
I'm fine with the rainbow border you made, but the green you chose is a bit blinding/distracting, so maybe choose a lighter green...? Brambleclawx ( talk) 21:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Never mind, I did it myself. Brambleclawx ( talk) 23:22, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
This is what I envision as the current characters page after I finish the split, but I need help adding citations.
List of characters in the Warriors novel series
Brambleclawx ( talk) 20:01, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
Good idea
Brambleclawx (
talk)
20:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
I was looking over all the other pages, and I'm realising that a lot of links (on the pages themselves, and on other warriors pages), will need to be fixed. Brambleclawx ( talk) 17:08, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
I've gotta admit: even though I'm a year older than you, your organisation skills are a lot better than mine. So yeah, I'll move it in by next weekend, as long as nothing weird comes up and delays me. I'm actually spending a lot of time now trying to cite sources: most of the character pages cited nothing, so i went and cited all the relevant books. As I said before, I don't mind you editing those pages, since I know you will not try to vandalise it. So if you have time, you can help me cite the books. usually I cite like this: <ref name=booknameorsimplifiedbookname> Hunter, Erin. (200X) ''[[Bookname (Warriors)|Bookname]]'' (number of pages)pp. </ref>. some of the ref names i've used are: intothewild, moonrise, and catsotc (otc stands for of the clans). That way, afterwards, I just have to type <ref name=bookname></ref>. but I suppose you already knew how to do that.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 22:58, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Oh. I didn't know that. Thanks. and by the way, don't bother putting a tb template on my page: I have this page in my watchlist.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 23:54, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Well, the issue is that most of them have few or no citations, so they might be subjected to deletion. So if you could add some citations first, sure. Brambleclawx ( talk) 00:09, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
apparently, you need to put a copied template on it to give credit to the original contributors. Brambleclawx ( talk) 00:35, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Er... well i was talking to an admin about it... lemme see... its here. And there, I'm directed to read Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 01:22, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Thanks for doing that, I really appreciate it. Brambleclawx ( talk) 01:24, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
I have now moved the pages into the mainspace: I would like you to add citations for the tribe page and the cats outside clans page.
I will also begin to fix links Brambleclawx ( talk) 00:51, 2 December 2009 (UTC)
Hey, do you believe me when I say the cat on the cover of Twilight is Crowfeather? 'Cuz there's some editor who keeps changing it to Cinderpelt even though I have put proof for it in a hidden comment. Brambleclawx ( talk) 02:02, 3 December 2009 (UTC)
Do you think its necessary to make searches of ThunderClan, WindClan, etc. become redirects? and apparently, if you search "shadowclan", you immediately arrive on a page about an MMORPG. Brambleclawx ( talk) 01:52, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I made the redirects for River, Sky and Wind clans, but i dunno how to do the shadowclan one. Also, creation of a new page called "ThunderClan" is currently protected from re-creation, cuz its been deleted 7 times under that name, and 4 times under the name "list of ThunderClan cats, and im not sure if its a wise idea to bring this up with editors, since they've deleted this page about 11 times in the past, and im not sure if this could be deleted under WP:CSD#G4. anyways, if you could do the ShadowClan one, I'd appreciate it. also, I don't know if its necessary to immediately redirect seraches of Tribe of Rushing Water to the warriors article, since i have no idea if this might actually point to another article.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 23:48, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I've talked to an admin, and i now have old versions of those pages under my userpage:
User:Brambleclawx/List of ThunderClan Cats, User:Brambleclawx/List of RiverClan Cats, User:Brambleclawx/List of WindClan Cats, User:Brambleclawx/List of ShadowClan Cats, and User:Brambleclawx/List of SkyClan Cats.
From what I can tell, the new pages should be safe from Wikipedia:CSD#G4, since they are substantially different from what they were before. The only one that worries me is the SkyClan page, which still looks very much like it did before. My idea is this: transfer the information listed in the old deleted article (accessible through the link i gave) about the old SkyClan cats (the ones that got driven out), then add a minor characters table like the other Clan pages. And do you feel there might be an issue with self-Published sources? uz its kinda hard to find any other source relating to warriors...
Brambleclawx ( talk) 20:53, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Great!
In case you didnt notice yet, we've lost one more WikiProject Warriors member to the inactive list: Bramblestar (ShadowClan Leader), his reasoning being this.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 21:57, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Well, actually, that guy was previously listed under "Possibly Inactive", so he didnt get a role call message, and since he was active, i decided to contact him. I have left a message for TakaraLioness, who, if im not mistaken, is the single editor who has edited the Warriors page the most.
Brambleclawx ( talk) 22:14, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Sure. I've done that now to redirects for the plays and short stories. Brambleclawx ( talk) 21:02, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
I've been looking over some Wikipedia guidleines: I am so sure that Night Whispers (Warriors) is going to get deleted, since Wikipedia discourages articles about unreleased books, and there's virtually no information on the page at the moment, because there really isn't much we can put on the page... ideas?
All the book specific pages probably need an overhaul as well: Wikipedia also does not like pages that are bascially just plot summaries.
And I'm still working on grammar and spelling for all pages. I think by January, Warriors (novel series) might be ready for nomination for GA status. Brambleclawx ( talk) 02:14, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
An easy way is to find one page that lists critiques for the book, and search that reviewer for reviews on the other books as well. Brambleclawx ( talk) 02:24, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Oh. I know you're probably just as busy as i am, but if you have time, i'd like your help making all the references on Warriors (novel series) use the same format. It looks neater, and its easier to cite. also, some people cited the book description pages on HarperCollins and amazon instead of the book itself. That probably needs fixing. But I guess this will take time, since we're both busy with school. If I had more time, I could probably do it quite quickly. But I'll really appreciate help with this. Brambleclawx ( talk) 03:06, 9 December 2009 (UTC)
Hi Airplaneman, thanks for the message. The Dell Adamo comment read to me as more like trivia and seemed out of place in the MacBook Air article. It's interesting no doubt, but I didn't get the impression it really belonged, which is why I removed it. I also feel the phrasing, "At the time of release, Apple described…" was enough to imply that there would be obvious future contesters for 'thinnest laptop' status. If you specifically mention Dell Adamo, does that mean any thinner laptops in the future will also need to be listed there alongside? EssentialParadox ( talk) 00:47, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
Hello Airplaneman. In reviewing CSD nominations, I have noted that two of your recent nominations (Pimpinela and S dnem rozhdeniya Vika) sucked (i.e. were not in accordance with policy). Please be more careful when tagging other contributors' work for speedy deletion. We're getting a bad rep (e.g., the WSJ front page article earlier this week) because of reflexive actions such as the ones you took. -- Y not? 15:30, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
...very much for your kind welcome on my talk page. Your link collection is indeed very helpful. Thanks, -- Firefly's luciferase ( talk) 00:21, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Hey, I accept your adoption program. I was kind of adopted before, but my adoptee turned semi-retired. Anyway, thanks for the offer and get in touch. VTomi ( talk) 20:18, 29 November 2009 (UTC)
Note: Significant changes have been made to the article being discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Concerto in G Major since your last comments. davidwr/( talk)/( contribs)/( e-mail) 00:52, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |