Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Liberal Initiative (Portugal), you may be
blocked from editing.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
01:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary, as you did at
Liberal Initiative (Portugal).
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
02:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at
Liberal Initiative (Portugal), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
02:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 03:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Liberal Initiative, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Vacant0 (
talk)
14:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
with its policy base described as combining economic liberalism with more progressive stances on cultural issues." is present on the page. You have been edit warring on the page since 2019, you should stop and take it to the talk page to discuss with other editors. Vacant0 ( talk) 14:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Toca em relva bro TheRealDiogoFaro ( talk) 15:05, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Vai ver o que aquele corno anda a fazer na página da IL. Vocês têm de deixar de ser mansos e permitir que a comunada adicione fontes bastante questionáveis para deturpar a imagem da IL. A estrangeirada come aquilo como se fosse verdade. O gajo está a destruir a página da IL, completamente passado dos cornos. 2001:8A0:6A16:8301:5E9:CBFF:1927:7FF5 ( talk) 19:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Liberal Initiative, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
03:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Liberal Initiative (Portugal), you may be
blocked from editing.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
01:05, 28 December 2020 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary, as you did at
Liberal Initiative (Portugal).
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
02:11, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at
Liberal Initiative (Portugal), you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
02:14, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello, and
welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly
reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "
edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the
normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a
consensus on the
talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. ProcrastinatingReader ( talk) 03:10, 30 December 2020 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to
Liberal Initiative, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Vacant0 (
talk)
14:29, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
with its policy base described as combining economic liberalism with more progressive stances on cultural issues." is present on the page. You have been edit warring on the page since 2019, you should stop and take it to the talk page to discuss with other editors. Vacant0 ( talk) 14:33, 29 July 2022 (UTC)
Toca em relva bro TheRealDiogoFaro ( talk) 15:05, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
Vai ver o que aquele corno anda a fazer na página da IL. Vocês têm de deixar de ser mansos e permitir que a comunada adicione fontes bastante questionáveis para deturpar a imagem da IL. A estrangeirada come aquilo como se fosse verdade. O gajo está a destruir a página da IL, completamente passado dos cornos. 2001:8A0:6A16:8301:5E9:CBFF:1927:7FF5 ( talk) 19:37, 7 January 2024 (UTC)
This is your only warning; if you
vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at
Liberal Initiative, you may be
blocked from editing without further notice.
Vif12vf/Tiberius (
talk)
03:08, 26 January 2024 (UTC)