Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Night on Bald Mountain have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 07:27, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your edits regarding the infoboxes of music biographies are angering local editors, and don't think I didn't notice that you are perusing my edit history and manually undoing my edits, specifically the short descriptions of Australian prime ministers. You need to stop. Thrakkx ( talk) 04:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Cello, you may be
blocked from editing.
Kpddg
(talk)
04:23, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue to
harass other editors, you may be
blocked from editing. Please stop sifting through my edit history, policing my edits, and reverting those which you do not understand.
Thrakkx (
talk)
14:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Aesthetic Writer! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Grimes2 ( talk) 08:42, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
There's a discussion on my talk to explain my revert. You seem to misread the guideline. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
English is not my first language: I don't understand the one line on your brandnew user page. I'm interested in how you - a new user as of today, and making good changes (Monteverdi ...) - come up with a belief that was strange already in 2010, but certainly doesn't work in 2022: that composers are somehow different from other creative minds. - Also: there is no need to reach a consensus if all agree anyway; a talk page discussion is needed only if an edit gets reverted. Please keep things simple. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:29, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
How did you find Disinfobox? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:42, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Please stop reverting infoboxes that were stable, and stop adding the hidden message. I'd hate to report you. There are discretionary sanctions out, and if you know disinfobox, you'll know that, too. All unrest in the field of infoboxes is unwanted, both directions, - we call that "disruptive". Peace, please. Bishonen, please watch. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you are in great danger of being reverted (and warned) if, as at Eric Gill, you delete materials without supplying any kind of edit comment.
It is good practice to supply an edit comment for every edit you make, even if it's only "copyedit" or "rm surplus ext link" – it need not be long.
Unexplained edits automatically attract other editors' attention as it is a typical behaviour of vandals and one-time visitors, so, best avoided.
All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 09:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Please start using edit summaries and responding to questions from other editors on your talk page. This is the minimum communication Wikipedia requires from editors.
valereee (
talk)
17:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
I reverted your edit here because you removed a valid template without any explanation. I see that you joined the site only four days ago but you have already done 461 edits. Many of them utilise functionality that I wouldn't expect a new editor to know about. If you have an existing account, you need to record it on your user page and mention the differences between the two; and vice-versa.
You have been warned several times already about your usage of the site but have so far failed to WP:ENGAGE with anyone. That is a requirement if you are challenged per WP:LISTENTOUS, which I suggest you read. I can only add to the complaints made above by Gerda Arendt, Thrakkx, Kpddg, Valereee, Chiswick Chap, and Simplexity22. You need to be very careful indeed about how you continue or your account is likely to be blocked. No Great Shaker ( talk) 15:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
( edit conflict)The list of editors is growing, Johnbod! I have another list which contains functions, templates, policies and guidelines used by Aesthetic Writer with such familiarity that they are apparently second nature. I would like to know how a "new editor" can possibly know about and freely use these items, some of them completely new to me:
Can we please have a response per WP:ENGAGE including an explanation of how you have come to possess so much knowledge of the site and also why you are frequently making contentious edits that, as John points out, are a nuisance and need to be reverted? No Great Shaker ( talk) 16:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
I have to explain what I did,
I did because of Wikipedia:Manual of Style, WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS and other means whatsoever, since I tried to defend against their contributors of Wikipedia, before I did something that request I preferred. I edit some infoboxes of people (which whom are notable), I added links to IMSLP to Stravinsky works (which was recently added in January 2022 in Canada were is hosted). But since thrakkx, removing some flags from infoboxes of military personnel (mostly for U.S.), other contributors restored their flags and icons, including Bipin Rawat and Alois Brunner, and for some short descriptions (excluding lists). Since Thrakkx conflicted my edits to Leopold Mozart using my IP address, also I restored this version for "Men" article as unconstructive editing.
For Gerda Arendt, I'd removing some infoboxes of composers without consensus via talk page it would be necessary.
Since I removed and/or replace links from YouTube which had been identified as copyright violation, then I removed two honorific prefixes for South African presidents (which DrKay removed "His Excellency" as unsourced material) and one for UN secretary general Gutteres (which didn't have a presidential role in Portugal). But I apologized what I did to some contributors.
I'd edit, revert or modify by years of politicians, but quickly reverted due to RfC discussion for Australian prime ministers. -- Aesthetic Writer ( talk) 16:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
valereee (
talk)
19:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Aesthetic Writer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
As per above, I was trying to help for namespaces on Wikipedia, then someone who modify like good contributors in short description. Since I made a disruptive edits as my responsibility for regarding namespaces in each article.
Then I was reviewing Thrakkx's actions for changes/removes short description, infoboxes and hatnotes. Recently, I reverted, restored or undid for list of J. S. Bach's works and some articles for short description. Because it's not just a harassment idea, but only I need for discussion (for consensus) as a WP:BOLD edit.
For Arendt, I'd been misunderstood since it's been modifying the infobox like classical composers, without seeking new consensus.
Recently, I replied that my languages are incomprehensive, Because Wikipedia is a multilingual site over 325 languages (because I edit this French article for Jimmy Wales's picture for infobox) for which official Wikipedias have been created under the auspices of the Wikimedia Foundation. Aesthetic Writer ( talk) 23:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This really doesn't make much sense at all. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 04:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() |
Hello, Aesthetic Writer!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Slywriter (
talk)
02:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
|
Hello, Aesthetic Writer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Jet Boy (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aesthetic Writer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Jet Boy".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Night on Bald Mountain have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
Thank you. ClueBot NG ( talk) 07:27, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Your edits regarding the infoboxes of music biographies are angering local editors, and don't think I didn't notice that you are perusing my edit history and manually undoing my edits, specifically the short descriptions of Australian prime ministers. You need to stop. Thrakkx ( talk) 04:24, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at
Cello, you may be
blocked from editing.
Kpddg
(talk)
04:23, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. Wikipedia aims to provide a safe environment for its collaborators, and harassing other users potentially compromises that safe environment. If you continue to
harass other editors, you may be
blocked from editing. Please stop sifting through my edit history, policing my edits, and reverting those which you do not understand.
Thrakkx (
talk)
14:24, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi Aesthetic Writer! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.
Happy editing! Grimes2 ( talk) 08:42, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
There's a discussion on my talk to explain my revert. You seem to misread the guideline. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 08:48, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
English is not my first language: I don't understand the one line on your brandnew user page. I'm interested in how you - a new user as of today, and making good changes (Monteverdi ...) - come up with a belief that was strange already in 2010, but certainly doesn't work in 2022: that composers are somehow different from other creative minds. - Also: there is no need to reach a consensus if all agree anyway; a talk page discussion is needed only if an edit gets reverted. Please keep things simple. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 09:29, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
How did you find Disinfobox? -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:42, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Please stop reverting infoboxes that were stable, and stop adding the hidden message. I'd hate to report you. There are discretionary sanctions out, and if you know disinfobox, you'll know that, too. All unrest in the field of infoboxes is unwanted, both directions, - we call that "disruptive". Peace, please. Bishonen, please watch. -- Gerda Arendt ( talk) 16:59, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
Hi, you are in great danger of being reverted (and warned) if, as at Eric Gill, you delete materials without supplying any kind of edit comment.
It is good practice to supply an edit comment for every edit you make, even if it's only "copyedit" or "rm surplus ext link" – it need not be long.
Unexplained edits automatically attract other editors' attention as it is a typical behaviour of vandals and one-time visitors, so, best avoided.
All the best, Chiswick Chap ( talk) 09:46, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
Please start using edit summaries and responding to questions from other editors on your talk page. This is the minimum communication Wikipedia requires from editors.
valereee (
talk)
17:06, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
I reverted your edit here because you removed a valid template without any explanation. I see that you joined the site only four days ago but you have already done 461 edits. Many of them utilise functionality that I wouldn't expect a new editor to know about. If you have an existing account, you need to record it on your user page and mention the differences between the two; and vice-versa.
You have been warned several times already about your usage of the site but have so far failed to WP:ENGAGE with anyone. That is a requirement if you are challenged per WP:LISTENTOUS, which I suggest you read. I can only add to the complaints made above by Gerda Arendt, Thrakkx, Kpddg, Valereee, Chiswick Chap, and Simplexity22. You need to be very careful indeed about how you continue or your account is likely to be blocked. No Great Shaker ( talk) 15:08, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
( edit conflict)The list of editors is growing, Johnbod! I have another list which contains functions, templates, policies and guidelines used by Aesthetic Writer with such familiarity that they are apparently second nature. I would like to know how a "new editor" can possibly know about and freely use these items, some of them completely new to me:
Can we please have a response per WP:ENGAGE including an explanation of how you have come to possess so much knowledge of the site and also why you are frequently making contentious edits that, as John points out, are a nuisance and need to be reverted? No Great Shaker ( talk) 16:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
I have to explain what I did,
I did because of Wikipedia:Manual of Style, WP:IMPLICITCONSENSUS and other means whatsoever, since I tried to defend against their contributors of Wikipedia, before I did something that request I preferred. I edit some infoboxes of people (which whom are notable), I added links to IMSLP to Stravinsky works (which was recently added in January 2022 in Canada were is hosted). But since thrakkx, removing some flags from infoboxes of military personnel (mostly for U.S.), other contributors restored their flags and icons, including Bipin Rawat and Alois Brunner, and for some short descriptions (excluding lists). Since Thrakkx conflicted my edits to Leopold Mozart using my IP address, also I restored this version for "Men" article as unconstructive editing.
For Gerda Arendt, I'd removing some infoboxes of composers without consensus via talk page it would be necessary.
Since I removed and/or replace links from YouTube which had been identified as copyright violation, then I removed two honorific prefixes for South African presidents (which DrKay removed "His Excellency" as unsourced material) and one for UN secretary general Gutteres (which didn't have a presidential role in Portugal). But I apologized what I did to some contributors.
I'd edit, revert or modify by years of politicians, but quickly reverted due to RfC discussion for Australian prime ministers. -- Aesthetic Writer ( talk) 16:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
valereee (
talk)
19:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)Aesthetic Writer ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
As per above, I was trying to help for namespaces on Wikipedia, then someone who modify like good contributors in short description. Since I made a disruptive edits as my responsibility for regarding namespaces in each article.
Then I was reviewing Thrakkx's actions for changes/removes short description, infoboxes and hatnotes. Recently, I reverted, restored or undid for list of J. S. Bach's works and some articles for short description. Because it's not just a harassment idea, but only I need for discussion (for consensus) as a WP:BOLD edit.
For Arendt, I'd been misunderstood since it's been modifying the infobox like classical composers, without seeking new consensus.
Recently, I replied that my languages are incomprehensive, Because Wikipedia is a multilingual site over 325 languages (because I edit this French article for Jimmy Wales's picture for infobox) for which official Wikipedias have been created under the auspices of the Wikimedia Foundation. Aesthetic Writer ( talk) 23:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
Decline reason:
This really doesn't make much sense at all. NinjaRobotPirate ( talk) 04:21, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() |
Hello, Aesthetic Writer!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the
Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the
Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
Slywriter (
talk)
02:01, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
|
Hello, Aesthetic Writer. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that
Draft:Jet Boy (film), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months
may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please
edit it again or
request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot ( talk) 03:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, Aesthetic Writer. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, " Jet Boy".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 02:01, 17 July 2022 (UTC)
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review
the candidates and submit your choices on the
voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{
NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page.
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
01:55, 29 November 2022 (UTC)