Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Thank you.--
Sandor Clegane (
talk)
03:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
In the first instance, the history has indicated that this author has relevance to be featured in Wikipedia through extensive writings of interest to both public and private sectors internationally. Secondly, the author's books are listed in Google Books, as well as by more than three dozen book retailers world-wide, some of whom refer directly to the Wikipedia page. The author's particulars have been posted on Wikipedia for benefit of a large international interest group which warrants the posting. Thirdly, there is no conflict of this posting. The article does however require proper Wikipedia construct, which the author's book publisher will amend in due course. Lastly, it is beyond us that you have promoted yourself to being the Wikipedia watchdog of internationally sought-after information, which seems apparent that you bear no knowledge of.
Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered
vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being
blocked from editing Wikipedia. By the way, if the author's publisher is editing the article, then there is definitely a
conflict of interest. --
Sandor Clegane (
talk)
22:03, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Your details have been accessed and passed on. Say what?-- Sandor Clegane ( talk) 03:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Rudolph Frederick Stapelberg, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudolph Frederick Stapelberg. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sandor Clegane ( talk) 03:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- You have removed the AfD notification from the article; I reinstated it. Please refrain from removing such notifications. Drmies ( talk) 14:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Thank you.--
Sandor Clegane (
talk)
03:54, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
In the first instance, the history has indicated that this author has relevance to be featured in Wikipedia through extensive writings of interest to both public and private sectors internationally. Secondly, the author's books are listed in Google Books, as well as by more than three dozen book retailers world-wide, some of whom refer directly to the Wikipedia page. The author's particulars have been posted on Wikipedia for benefit of a large international interest group which warrants the posting. Thirdly, there is no conflict of this posting. The article does however require proper Wikipedia construct, which the author's book publisher will amend in due course. Lastly, it is beyond us that you have promoted yourself to being the Wikipedia watchdog of internationally sought-after information, which seems apparent that you bear no knowledge of.
Please stop. Continuing to remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to may be considered
vandalism. Further edits of this type may result in you being
blocked from editing Wikipedia. By the way, if the author's publisher is editing the article, then there is definitely a
conflict of interest. --
Sandor Clegane (
talk)
22:03, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
Your details have been accessed and passed on. Say what?-- Sandor Clegane ( talk) 03:35, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
An article that you have been involved in editing, Rudolph Frederick Stapelberg, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rudolph Frederick Stapelberg. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Sandor Clegane ( talk) 03:50, 19 May 2009 (UTC)
- You have removed the AfD notification from the article; I reinstated it. Please refrain from removing such notifications. Drmies ( talk) 14:43, 19 May 2009 (UTC)