Spelling/grammar: Meets standard It should be "in the form of a vibrant" instead of "in the form a vibrant". Also, in the last paragraph of the main body, the sentence "And has collaborated with" is a fragment. It has no subject.
Language: Meets standard
Organization: Exceeds standard
Coding: Exceeds standard
Validity: Meets standard
Completion: Exceeds standard
Relevance: Meets standard
Citations: Exceeds standard
References: Exceeds standard
You did a great job. It goes into great detail. The research seems very thorough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arakuresacred ( talk • contribs) 03:51, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Nearly Meets Standard
Exceeds Standard
Nearly Meets Standard
Exceeds Standard
Meets Standard
Exceeds Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Great job on this, it was interesting to read about, and was definetly new information for me. Thanks, NiciaD ( talk) 04:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Exceeeds Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard I like how your contriubtion was written in chronological order of events.
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Nearly Meets Standard Some grammar mistakes.
Meets Standard
Nearly Meets standard I think the organization should be more clear, for example, adding some sub-title to show the main idea of the paragraph.
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Nearly Meets Standard I think that you should add more information about the history of Steer Art in Lisbon because in the introduction paragraph, you mention some information about that.
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Spelling/grammar: Meets standard It should be "in the form of a vibrant" instead of "in the form a vibrant". Also, in the last paragraph of the main body, the sentence "And has collaborated with" is a fragment. It has no subject.
Language: Meets standard
Organization: Exceeds standard
Coding: Exceeds standard
Validity: Meets standard
Completion: Exceeds standard
Relevance: Meets standard
Citations: Exceeds standard
References: Exceeds standard
You did a great job. It goes into great detail. The research seems very thorough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arakuresacred ( talk • contribs) 03:51, 22 March 2018 (UTC)
Nearly Meets Standard
Exceeds Standard
Nearly Meets Standard
Exceeds Standard
Meets Standard
Exceeds Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Great job on this, it was interesting to read about, and was definetly new information for me. Thanks, NiciaD ( talk) 04:35, 20 March 2018 (UTC)
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Exceeeds Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard I like how your contriubtion was written in chronological order of events.
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Nearly Meets Standard Some grammar mistakes.
Meets Standard
Nearly Meets standard I think the organization should be more clear, for example, adding some sub-title to show the main idea of the paragraph.
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Nearly Meets Standard I think that you should add more information about the history of Steer Art in Lisbon because in the introduction paragraph, you mention some information about that.
Meets Standard
Meets Standard
Meets Standard