Hello, Accurate194534, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Staszek Lem ( talk) 00:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove
maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Three Chimneys (Genesee Depot, Wisconsin), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Thank you.
• Gene93k (
talk)
02:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Accurate194534 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Editor has given no reason to unblock
Decline reason:
No reason given to unblock; I note WP:NOTTHEM comments lower on this page.-- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 20:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Guilty until proven innocent? What is this? I am a frequent wiki reader and I saw one article that did not meet notability. The name of this individual popped into my head, for he made very specific posts, specifically ones regarding amusement rides, in fact, the article on Windseeker has been edited by both the sock puppeteer and his sock puppet. The same sort of disruptive edits and frequent deletion requests have been shown. The user "Marvellous Spider-Man" was created almost immediately after he was banned in the last of nearly a dozen sock puppetry bans for said individual. Additionally, he added a frivolous category to the Barbary Slave Trade article, saying the it was "racism against whites." The user has no business being involved in this encyclopedia. My mission with these few edits was to help create a better encyclopedia here. That's all. Accurate194534 (talk) 20:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC) Additionally, just go to the individual's oldest posts in contributions. They are practically identical to the ones that Starship9000 and his sock puppets have continually edited. The latest contributions are all his typical AFD targets. Who knows how much damage he has done with his many PRODs, AFDs, and Speedy Deletions, almost exclusively being against people of eastern descent.
Accurate194534 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have not edited in years and completely lost old login info. Please reinstate
Decline reason:
I don't believe that you forgot your username. You certainly remember pages that you edited, so you can find it in the page history. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:26, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Hello, Accurate194534, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Staszek Lem ( talk) 00:13, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Please do not remove
maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to
Three Chimneys (Genesee Depot, Wisconsin), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been
reverted. Thank you.
• Gene93k (
talk)
02:59, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
Accurate194534 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
Editor has given no reason to unblock
Decline reason:
No reason given to unblock; I note WP:NOTTHEM comments lower on this page.-- Anthony Bradbury "talk" 20:54, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Guilty until proven innocent? What is this? I am a frequent wiki reader and I saw one article that did not meet notability. The name of this individual popped into my head, for he made very specific posts, specifically ones regarding amusement rides, in fact, the article on Windseeker has been edited by both the sock puppeteer and his sock puppet. The same sort of disruptive edits and frequent deletion requests have been shown. The user "Marvellous Spider-Man" was created almost immediately after he was banned in the last of nearly a dozen sock puppetry bans for said individual. Additionally, he added a frivolous category to the Barbary Slave Trade article, saying the it was "racism against whites." The user has no business being involved in this encyclopedia. My mission with these few edits was to help create a better encyclopedia here. That's all. Accurate194534 (talk) 20:18, 21 September 2016 (UTC) Additionally, just go to the individual's oldest posts in contributions. They are practically identical to the ones that Starship9000 and his sock puppets have continually edited. The latest contributions are all his typical AFD targets. Who knows how much damage he has done with his many PRODs, AFDs, and Speedy Deletions, almost exclusively being against people of eastern descent.
Accurate194534 ( block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))
Request reason:
I have not edited in years and completely lost old login info. Please reinstate
Decline reason:
I don't believe that you forgot your username. You certainly remember pages that you edited, so you can find it in the page history. Vanjagenije (talk) 11:26, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{ unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
( block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser ( log))