|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Flixborough disaster has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Flixborough disaster was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://www.icheme.org/resources/safety_centre/publications/~/media/Documents/icheme/Safety%20Centre/HSE%20reports/Flixborough.pdf) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
18:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
If you do not wish to use this account, you can simply stop editing. User talk pages are not normally deleted, see WP:DELTALK; with a few exceptions described at WP:BLANKING you are welcome to blank anything from your talk page, but the history is preserved for the record. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 09:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Jens Rasmussen may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of FSS Code, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.techstreet.com/products/1787130.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot ( talk) 08:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
The article MATTE has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:NOTDICT, not mentioned at Seveso II Directive so can't be redirected there
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
|
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page
Flixborough disaster has been reverted.
Your edit
here to
Flixborough disaster was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our
external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (
http://www.icheme.org/resources/safety_centre/publications/~/media/Documents/icheme/Safety%20Centre/HSE%20reports/Flixborough.pdf) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an
external link that does comply with our
policies and
guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to
undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's
external links guideline for more information, and consult my
list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see
my FAQ page. Thanks! --
XLinkBot (
talk)
18:30, 15 June 2012 (UTC)
If you do not wish to use this account, you can simply stop editing. User talk pages are not normally deleted, see WP:DELTALK; with a few exceptions described at WP:BLANKING you are welcome to blank anything from your talk page, but the history is preserved for the record. Regards, JohnCD ( talk) 09:23, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
BracketBot. I have automatically detected that
your edit to
Jens Rasmussen may have broken the
syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just
edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on
my operator's talk page.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot ( talk) 12:05, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of FSS Code, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.techstreet.com/products/1787130.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot ( talk) 08:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
The article MATTE has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:NOTDICT, not mentioned at Seveso II Directive so can't be redirected there
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot ( talk) 10:00, 14 November 2023 (UTC)