Hi, I'm Bfpage. Abhishek aradhya, thanks for creating Aradhya!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Nice job on the article. I encourage you to keep on editing because this article has the potential of being even better.
Best regards,
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. bpage ( talk) 18:14, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Aradhya, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 06:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Idea Cellular, you may be
blocked from editing. —
Spaceman
Spiff
06:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Ass hole
Hello Abhishek aradhya, see here. Regards -- Serols ( talk) 15:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Yaduveer Krishnadatta Chamaraja Wadiyar.
ArglebargleIV (
talk)
03:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
BMW, you may be
blocked from editing. Your change was unexplained and unsourced. If this is not a deliberate factual error, you must cite a source and always provide an edit summary which properly explains your changes.
Murph9000 (
talk)
11:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Murph9000 ( talk) 11:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Abhishek aradhya. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about in the article
Jio, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Employees [1] of a company should not be editing its article, articles relating to their competitors, or industry areas where it would be possible to insert bias towards your company. Your unexplained edits, many lacking sources, create a major problem for this article and all of the articles within the same industry that you have been editing. Please read the conflict of interest policy closely, as you are in violation of it. Murph9000 ( talk) 11:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
The article Aradhya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
~ Winged Blades
Godric
15:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Hi, I'm Bfpage. Abhishek aradhya, thanks for creating Aradhya!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Nice job on the article. I encourage you to keep on editing because this article has the potential of being even better.
Best regards,
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. bpage ( talk) 18:14, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Aradhya, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 06:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at
Idea Cellular, you may be
blocked from editing. —
Spaceman
Spiff
06:30, 16 September 2016 (UTC) Ass hole
Hello Abhishek aradhya, see here. Regards -- Serols ( talk) 15:39, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with
this edit to
Yaduveer Krishnadatta Chamaraja Wadiyar.
ArglebargleIV (
talk)
03:03, 17 September 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to
vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at
BMW, you may be
blocked from editing. Your change was unexplained and unsourced. If this is not a deliberate factual error, you must cite a source and always provide an edit summary which properly explains your changes.
Murph9000 (
talk)
11:19, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled " Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! Murph9000 ( talk) 11:21, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
Hello, Abhishek aradhya. We
welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things
you have written about in the article
Jio, you may have a
conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the
conflict of interest guideline and
FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Employees [1] of a company should not be editing its article, articles relating to their competitors, or industry areas where it would be possible to insert bias towards your company. Your unexplained edits, many lacking sources, create a major problem for this article and all of the articles within the same industry that you have been editing. Please read the conflict of interest policy closely, as you are in violation of it. Murph9000 ( talk) 11:32, 18 September 2016 (UTC)
The article Aradhya has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
I'm not seeing any significant and/or non-trivial coverage in any reliable source (books, scholarly dissertations et al), to justify a standalone article.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your
edit summary or on
the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the
proposed deletion process, but other
deletion processes exist. In particular, the
speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and
articles for deletion allows discussion to reach
consensus for deletion.
~ Winged Blades
Godric
15:50, 7 June 2018 (UTC)