→Images: provide link |
PadmaDharma101 (
talk |
contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
--[[User:PadmaDharma101|PadmaDharma101]] ([[User talk:PadmaDharma101|talk]]) 06:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC) |
--[[User:PadmaDharma101|PadmaDharma101]] ([[User talk:PadmaDharma101|talk]]) 06:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
: You are welcome to take the issue to [[WP:ANI]]. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare#top|talk]]) 06:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC) |
: You are welcome to take the issue to [[WP:ANI]] cause im an Admin. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare#top|talk]]) 06:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC) |
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
.
Sorry, it was just an edit conflict. I am fixing your corrections. David G Brault ( talk) 07:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Ah, I see untangling this will take some time. I will have to dust off my copies of Gavin Flood and R&M and start checking citations. Have left a suitably worded suggestion on FTN, will follow-up in a bit. -- Relata refero ( disp.) 23:47, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Abece, I came here to just let you know that I find your proposal mostly acceptable. We'll deal with the details when we get to it. For now, please continue to work on your proposal. I thought I'd say this on the article talk page itself, but I noticed that Fowler's already laid waste to that thread with his signature off-topic babble. Sarvagnya 00:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Is there a way to stop some editors from removing citations and messing up FA articles, say like locking up the page? I hate to see any page locked up, but at times it seems needed. Please see Tamil language and Chola dynasty, two of the FAs being messed up by a group of editors. Can you help?-- Aadal ( talk) 03:08, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
As you have suggested I wanted to discuss your revert on [1]. Maybe you can spell it out for us please. Not that I insist that it should be there, but its a valid addition of the meaning of the word. In Sanskrit word very often taken apart when meaning is described. Wikidās ॐ 22:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Please post and follow-ups at Krishna talk page so that the conversation is not duplicated any further. Abecedare ( talk) 00:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the wonderful suggestion. I agree that reviewing featured article candidates would certainly help, and I would love to do so as soon as I get a chance. Cheers. -- Shruti14 t c s 23:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello there. The article 2008 attacks on North Indians in Maharashtra is undergoing a peer review. Can you give your views on it? Here is the link to its peer review. KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 ( talk) 13:50, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
If you keep reverting my edits or interupting my edits you will be reported to authority.
and Image:Brahmana.jpg is my photo. if i notice you keep gonig through my edits you will be informed. even if you think its copied please provide accurate investagation.
-- PadmaDharma101 ( talk) 06:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
→Images: provide link |
PadmaDharma101 (
talk |
contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 52: | Line 52: | ||
--[[User:PadmaDharma101|PadmaDharma101]] ([[User talk:PadmaDharma101|talk]]) 06:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC) |
--[[User:PadmaDharma101|PadmaDharma101]] ([[User talk:PadmaDharma101|talk]]) 06:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
: You are welcome to take the issue to [[WP:ANI]]. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare#top|talk]]) 06:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC) |
: You are welcome to take the issue to [[WP:ANI]] cause im an Admin. [[User:Abecedare|Abecedare]] ([[User talk:Abecedare#top|talk]]) 06:44, 27 April 2008 (UTC) |
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
.
Sorry, it was just an edit conflict. I am fixing your corrections. David G Brault ( talk) 07:16, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Ah, I see untangling this will take some time. I will have to dust off my copies of Gavin Flood and R&M and start checking citations. Have left a suitably worded suggestion on FTN, will follow-up in a bit. -- Relata refero ( disp.) 23:47, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Hi Abece, I came here to just let you know that I find your proposal mostly acceptable. We'll deal with the details when we get to it. For now, please continue to work on your proposal. I thought I'd say this on the article talk page itself, but I noticed that Fowler's already laid waste to that thread with his signature off-topic babble. Sarvagnya 00:14, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Is there a way to stop some editors from removing citations and messing up FA articles, say like locking up the page? I hate to see any page locked up, but at times it seems needed. Please see Tamil language and Chola dynasty, two of the FAs being messed up by a group of editors. Can you help?-- Aadal ( talk) 03:08, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
As you have suggested I wanted to discuss your revert on [1]. Maybe you can spell it out for us please. Not that I insist that it should be there, but its a valid addition of the meaning of the word. In Sanskrit word very often taken apart when meaning is described. Wikidās ॐ 22:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Please post and follow-ups at Krishna talk page so that the conversation is not duplicated any further. Abecedare ( talk) 00:18, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for the wonderful suggestion. I agree that reviewing featured article candidates would certainly help, and I would love to do so as soon as I get a chance. Cheers. -- Shruti14 t c s 23:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Hello there. The article 2008 attacks on North Indians in Maharashtra is undergoing a peer review. Can you give your views on it? Here is the link to its peer review. KnowledgeHegemonyPart2 ( talk) 13:50, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
If you keep reverting my edits or interupting my edits you will be reported to authority.
and Image:Brahmana.jpg is my photo. if i notice you keep gonig through my edits you will be informed. even if you think its copied please provide accurate investagation.
-- PadmaDharma101 ( talk) 06:43, 27 April 2008 (UTC)