Hi Abc747! I noticed your contributions to Oaklands Catholic School and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Tacyarg ( talk) 17:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
OnlyNano. I noticed that in
this edit to
Oaklands Catholic School, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
OnlyNano
17:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for your edits and I hope you choose to stay on Wiki.
Regarding the additions to the external links section of the Karmein Chan article, blogs are considered unreliable sources. Most podcasts are self-published. All the best, and again I'll say I hope you stay on here. Any help or advice feel free to ask. Best regards, Key. Kieronoldham ( talk) 00:49, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Joseph Stalin into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
19:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from
CIA Kennedy assassination conspiracy theory. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. Thank you.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I would respectfully ask that you please stop combining/splitting paragraphs. Your mixing things together out of context in some cases, and in others splitting things out of context. I don't mean to be mean but it's like there is competency issue with reading comprehension. Is there some other way you can contribute to Wikipedia that does not involve this kind of work? I don't enjoy reverting you or making these comments on your talk page but I need maintain the integrity of the articles. -- Green C 15:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I've been making a number of edits to reach 500 (extended confirmed)!seemed like inappropriate - there is a policy about this if I'm not wrong. --- Cat12zu3 ( talk) 20:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I have reverted your unexplained removal of a large quantity of text from the Silas Jayne article. Repetition of such vandalism can lead to being banned and blocked from editing. Spideog ( talk) 03:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an
edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be
quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks!
Spideog (
talk)
03:49, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hi Abc747! I noticed your contributions to Oaklands Catholic School and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! Tacyarg ( talk) 17:11, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Hello, I'm
OnlyNano. I noticed that in
this edit to
Oaklands Catholic School, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an
edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
OnlyNano
17:20, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thanks for your edits and I hope you choose to stay on Wiki.
Regarding the additions to the external links section of the Karmein Chan article, blogs are considered unreliable sources. Most podcasts are self-published. All the best, and again I'll say I hope you stay on here. Any help or advice feel free to ask. Best regards, Key. Kieronoldham ( talk) 00:49, 23 June 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for
your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from
Joseph Stalin into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere,
Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an
edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and
linking to the copied page, e.g.,
copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution
. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{
copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at
Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. —
JJMC89 (
T·
C)
19:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed
maintenance templates from
CIA Kennedy assassination conspiracy theory. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the
edit summary. Please see
Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been
reverted. Take a look at the
welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use
your sandbox. Thank you.
Ad Orientem (
talk)
22:10, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I would respectfully ask that you please stop combining/splitting paragraphs. Your mixing things together out of context in some cases, and in others splitting things out of context. I don't mean to be mean but it's like there is competency issue with reading comprehension. Is there some other way you can contribute to Wikipedia that does not involve this kind of work? I don't enjoy reverting you or making these comments on your talk page but I need maintain the integrity of the articles. -- Green C 15:03, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I've been making a number of edits to reach 500 (extended confirmed)!seemed like inappropriate - there is a policy about this if I'm not wrong. --- Cat12zu3 ( talk) 20:57, 11 July 2024 (UTC)
I have reverted your unexplained removal of a large quantity of text from the Silas Jayne article. Repetition of such vandalism can lead to being banned and blocked from editing. Spideog ( talk) 03:44, 13 July 2024 (UTC)
Hello. Thank you for
your contributions to
Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an
edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be
quite brief.
The edit summary field looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a
Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting
Preferences →
Editing →
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button.
Thanks!
Spideog (
talk)
03:49, 13 July 2024 (UTC)