Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia.
You know the line about not being able to see the forest for the trees? List of U.S. political families is about the forest. Look, for instance, at the Kennedy and Roosevelt entries. The short biographies you've been adding belong on entries for the specific individuals, with synopses on Baldwin, Hoar & Sherman family, and bare identification on the List. —wwoods 17:08, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
He was also the son of US Senator Henry Frederick Lippitt, 1911-1917, and Lucy Hayes Herron Lippitt, the grandson of Rhode Island Governor Henry Lippitt, the nephew of Rhode Island Governor Charles Warren Lippitt. Former US First Lady Nellie Herron Taft was his aunt, cousin of both the late Senator John Hubbard Lester Chafee and current US Senator Lincoln Davenport Chafee. Zechariah Chafee Jr., (1859-1943), married Mary Dexter Sharpe in 1885; president, Builder's Iron Foundry of Providence; Professor of Law, Harvard Law School, 1916-56. Drafter, Federal Interpleader Act. His book Freedom of Speech (1920) established him as a leading legal thinker on civil liberties issues.
William Howard Taft III (1915–1991), US Ambassador, Ireland, 1953–1957; son of Robert Alphonso Taft, brother of Robert Taft, Jr.
Simeon Baldwin Chittenden, Henry Baldwin Harrison and John Brown Baldwin don't appear to have any close relation to the Sherman-Baldwin family.
Baldwin, Hoar & Sherman family has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. NickelShoe 17:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
I would be happy to help edit this page if I could get anyone to agree on how it should be done.
In the Skull and Bones article, were you aware you changed the S&B 1931 of John Henry Heinz, II to "John Heinz" (his son), though its not really accurate that way and misleading? I see the "point" of the link it being the only available link right now, though its just not "kosher" I guess because John Heinz III is not SB as I indicated in a previous edit's notes. :-) A suggestion: a secondary link to his son after the original version, to clear that up? Just looking into your motivations for the change. Cheers, I'll have to come back and read your page. -- ReSearcher 04:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
My apology, and I assure you that the mistake was accidently. I had previously heard the John Kerry (S&B 1968) had married his Teresa Heinz after her husband (who was said to be bones as well) died. So the mistake was mine, but unintentional. However, I did eliminate Heinz altogether from S&B page, as his father was not a member of the US Congress, which is what that section was intended for. Sorry for the confusion
You can check my web blog for additional Bones information. http://inaaronsopinion.blogspot.com/
Fair enough. I am doing research for Kris Millegan's next version of "Fleshing Out Skull & Bones. Due out in 2007.
It appears that much of that has been edited out of your posting.
Hi. You deleted something I'd just added on List of United States political families without an edit summary. I had to assume your intent was that the personage Mary Gore Dean was not notable. I checked some sources and she isn't as notable as I remembered, so I decided to leave her out, but it would be very helpful and courteous to other editors if you would add edit summaries. I see you've been here a while, and I'm surprised you haven't experienced how helpful they are from the other side. -- Dhartung | Talk 03:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, but I just thought that it was obvious that she was not a political figure, and held no political office. As the page is for only political members of prominent US political families.
She should be mentioned on Wikipedia, and "Deborah Gore Dean, former HUD official convicted in a kickback scandal" would apply, but you should really include her HUD title and dates that she served in that position; otherwise it looks like your just trying to smear the Gore family. If that is your intent, you should include the information about about Mary Gore Dean (she is notable) Gore somewhere on Al Gore's page (perhaps), but she is not a political figure...anymore than Monica Lewinsky, Mary Meyer, Marilyn Monroe, Jennifer Flowers, Fawn Hall, Jennifer Fitzpatrick, etc, etc, etc.
I have limited energies to devote to
Baldwin, Hoar & Sherman family, but it would be nice to figure out how to make it more accessible.
For example, I cannot figure out if all of Roger Shermans children are even shown on that page.
This, over at
Roosevelt_family has some appeal.
or
Template_talk:Blackfamilytree#Dimensions
Even simply numbering the generations, perhaps in addition to
What's your interest lately in the topic? -- Yellowdesk 05:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I would be willing to do what ever is necessary, but I am not real familiar with how the Wiki formatting works.
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Henry Hotchkiss Townshend, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Henry Hotchkiss Townshend seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Henry Hotchkiss Townshend, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.
CSDWarnBot
22:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
The article you created, Charles_C._Beaman maybe deleted from Wikipedia.
There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.
There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb ( talk) 21:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
A discussion has begun about whether the article Baldwin, Hoar and Sherman family, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldwin, Hoar and Sherman family until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Orlady ( talk) 05:09, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Back in 2007 you made ten consecutive edits to the article Charles Callahan Perkins. You gave the source
I have done some Google searches and it appears that some of the text also appears in copyrighted sources "There are tributes to Perkins by Robert C. Winthrop" and "Prior to 1850, Perkins had proposed an art museum for Boston but had found the plan premature"
I also notice that you included this source at the same time www.famousamericans.net/charlescallahanperkins/ (Museum of History >> Hall of North and South Americans >> Charles Callahan Perkins)
Can you please provide a link to the original copyright expired volume from which you obtained the text. If not then the text will have to be deleted. -- PBS ( talk) 08:32, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, AaronB0413. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emily Baldwin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reginald Foster. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Please use the {{
help me}} template appropriately. The {{ help me}} template is for help in using Wikipedia, not for unrelated issues. If you would like to ask such a question, replace the code {{
help me-inappropriate}} on this page with {{
help me}} to reactivate the help request. Alternatively, you can also ask your question at the
Teahouse, the
help desk, or join
Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. |
I would love to speak to someone that I could collaborate with on American founding father Roger Sherman's page, and all the associated family members. Aaron ( ATrain ( talk) 23:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)) aaronbaldwinsf@gmail.com
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Josiah Willard Gibbs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Immersion (mathematics).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxwell Evarts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia.
You know the line about not being able to see the forest for the trees? List of U.S. political families is about the forest. Look, for instance, at the Kennedy and Roosevelt entries. The short biographies you've been adding belong on entries for the specific individuals, with synopses on Baldwin, Hoar & Sherman family, and bare identification on the List. —wwoods 17:08, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
He was also the son of US Senator Henry Frederick Lippitt, 1911-1917, and Lucy Hayes Herron Lippitt, the grandson of Rhode Island Governor Henry Lippitt, the nephew of Rhode Island Governor Charles Warren Lippitt. Former US First Lady Nellie Herron Taft was his aunt, cousin of both the late Senator John Hubbard Lester Chafee and current US Senator Lincoln Davenport Chafee. Zechariah Chafee Jr., (1859-1943), married Mary Dexter Sharpe in 1885; president, Builder's Iron Foundry of Providence; Professor of Law, Harvard Law School, 1916-56. Drafter, Federal Interpleader Act. His book Freedom of Speech (1920) established him as a leading legal thinker on civil liberties issues.
William Howard Taft III (1915–1991), US Ambassador, Ireland, 1953–1957; son of Robert Alphonso Taft, brother of Robert Taft, Jr.
Simeon Baldwin Chittenden, Henry Baldwin Harrison and John Brown Baldwin don't appear to have any close relation to the Sherman-Baldwin family.
Baldwin, Hoar & Sherman family has been proposed for deletion. Please see the article for details. NickelShoe 17:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)
I would be happy to help edit this page if I could get anyone to agree on how it should be done.
In the Skull and Bones article, were you aware you changed the S&B 1931 of John Henry Heinz, II to "John Heinz" (his son), though its not really accurate that way and misleading? I see the "point" of the link it being the only available link right now, though its just not "kosher" I guess because John Heinz III is not SB as I indicated in a previous edit's notes. :-) A suggestion: a secondary link to his son after the original version, to clear that up? Just looking into your motivations for the change. Cheers, I'll have to come back and read your page. -- ReSearcher 04:57, 13 March 2006 (UTC)
My apology, and I assure you that the mistake was accidently. I had previously heard the John Kerry (S&B 1968) had married his Teresa Heinz after her husband (who was said to be bones as well) died. So the mistake was mine, but unintentional. However, I did eliminate Heinz altogether from S&B page, as his father was not a member of the US Congress, which is what that section was intended for. Sorry for the confusion
You can check my web blog for additional Bones information. http://inaaronsopinion.blogspot.com/
Fair enough. I am doing research for Kris Millegan's next version of "Fleshing Out Skull & Bones. Due out in 2007.
It appears that much of that has been edited out of your posting.
Hi. You deleted something I'd just added on List of United States political families without an edit summary. I had to assume your intent was that the personage Mary Gore Dean was not notable. I checked some sources and she isn't as notable as I remembered, so I decided to leave her out, but it would be very helpful and courteous to other editors if you would add edit summaries. I see you've been here a while, and I'm surprised you haven't experienced how helpful they are from the other side. -- Dhartung | Talk 03:37, 3 April 2006 (UTC)
Sorry, but I just thought that it was obvious that she was not a political figure, and held no political office. As the page is for only political members of prominent US political families.
She should be mentioned on Wikipedia, and "Deborah Gore Dean, former HUD official convicted in a kickback scandal" would apply, but you should really include her HUD title and dates that she served in that position; otherwise it looks like your just trying to smear the Gore family. If that is your intent, you should include the information about about Mary Gore Dean (she is notable) Gore somewhere on Al Gore's page (perhaps), but she is not a political figure...anymore than Monica Lewinsky, Mary Meyer, Marilyn Monroe, Jennifer Flowers, Fawn Hall, Jennifer Fitzpatrick, etc, etc, etc.
I have limited energies to devote to
Baldwin, Hoar & Sherman family, but it would be nice to figure out how to make it more accessible.
For example, I cannot figure out if all of Roger Shermans children are even shown on that page.
This, over at
Roosevelt_family has some appeal.
or
Template_talk:Blackfamilytree#Dimensions
Even simply numbering the generations, perhaps in addition to
What's your interest lately in the topic? -- Yellowdesk 05:36, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
I would be willing to do what ever is necessary, but I am not real familiar with how the Wiki formatting works.
Hello, this is a message from
an automated bot. A tag has been placed on
Henry Hotchkiss Townshend, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be
speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because
Henry Hotchkiss Townshend seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the
criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please
see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting
Henry Hotchkiss Townshend, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at
WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the
bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself.
CSDWarnBot
22:32, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
The article you created, Charles_C._Beaman maybe deleted from Wikipedia.
There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.
There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb ( talk) 21:55, 31 December 2008 (UTC)
A discussion has begun about whether the article Baldwin, Hoar and Sherman family, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baldwin, Hoar and Sherman family until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.
You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Orlady ( talk) 05:09, 5 November 2010 (UTC)
Back in 2007 you made ten consecutive edits to the article Charles Callahan Perkins. You gave the source
I have done some Google searches and it appears that some of the text also appears in copyrighted sources "There are tributes to Perkins by Robert C. Winthrop" and "Prior to 1850, Perkins had proposed an art museum for Boston but had found the plan premature"
I also notice that you included this source at the same time www.famousamericans.net/charlescallahanperkins/ (Museum of History >> Hall of North and South Americans >> Charles Callahan Perkins)
Can you please provide a link to the original copyright expired volume from which you obtained the text. If not then the text will have to be deleted. -- PBS ( talk) 08:32, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
12:59, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello, AaronB0413. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery ( talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emily Baldwin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reginald Foster. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot ( talk) 06:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
![]() | Please use the {{
help me}} template appropriately. The {{ help me}} template is for help in using Wikipedia, not for unrelated issues. If you would like to ask such a question, replace the code {{
help me-inappropriate}} on this page with {{
help me}} to reactivate the help request. Alternatively, you can also ask your question at the
Teahouse, the
help desk, or join
Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. |
I would love to speak to someone that I could collaborate with on American founding father Roger Sherman's page, and all the associated family members. Aaron ( ATrain ( talk) 23:04, 29 November 2020 (UTC)) aaronbaldwinsf@gmail.com
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Josiah Willard Gibbs, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Immersion (mathematics).
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 06:06, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maxwell Evarts until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.