We never do this. First we discuss, giving other editors a chance to opine, then we can make changes after consensus is reached. Consensus is reached through discussions on talk pages, preferably without too much personal stuff, not by POV in edit summaries. Please never do anything like that again! SergeWoodzing ( talk) 17:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi there. In regards to the removal of the Cape Romano pyramid house photograph, what makes a verified news website an unreliable source? Wikipedia directly draws from these for information in many cases. If a regular news site isn’t reputable, then what is?
SavagePanda845 (
talk)
09:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cannabis (drug), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian language. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I've re-added my edit about the Hoym Ordinance, which you replaced with a book citation about 1905 Warsaw. I'm assuming that your reference relates to later Prussian Legislation mandating Jews adopt surnames but over 100 years after the Hoym Ordinance? Duncnbiscuit ( talk) 10:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
If the new age books indeed have good sourcing, then source that material instead, "as cited in". Tommygunn7886 ( talk) 22:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Etymology of cannabis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)
We never do this. First we discuss, giving other editors a chance to opine, then we can make changes after consensus is reached. Consensus is reached through discussions on talk pages, preferably without too much personal stuff, not by POV in edit summaries. Please never do anything like that again! SergeWoodzing ( talk) 17:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC)
Hi there. In regards to the removal of the Cape Romano pyramid house photograph, what makes a verified news website an unreliable source? Wikipedia directly draws from these for information in many cases. If a regular news site isn’t reputable, then what is?
SavagePanda845 (
talk)
09:07, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cannabis (drug), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian language. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
Hi, I've re-added my edit about the Hoym Ordinance, which you replaced with a book citation about 1905 Warsaw. I'm assuming that your reference relates to later Prussian Legislation mandating Jews adopt surnames but over 100 years after the Hoym Ordinance? Duncnbiscuit ( talk) 10:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
If the new age books indeed have good sourcing, then source that material instead, "as cited in". Tommygunn7886 ( talk) 22:33, 18 June 2024 (UTC)
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Etymology of cannabis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Assyrian.
( Opt-out instructions.) -- DPL bot ( talk) 05:56, 19 June 2024 (UTC)