This user may have left Wikipedia. AHRtbA== has not edited Wikipedia since 23 September 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I use WikiBiff to notify me of changes on my Talk Page and Watchlist, even when I'm not on Wikipedia. |
Hello AHRtbA==.
I have noticed that you revert a lot of vandalism. Have you heard of
rollback before? It allows a user to revert vandalism much faster than by undo-ing it. I think you should
ask for it. I am not an admin, or I would give it to you myself. I wrote this just to let you know about the existence of rollback because before someone randomly gave it to me, I did not know it existed. If you ask for it, you should have no problem getting it, as you clearly have an excellent grasp of what constitutes vandalism. Good luck, and may the vandals fail...
J.delanoy
gabs
adds
15:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
I have
granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting
vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting
good-faith edits or to
revert-war. For information on rollback, see
Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and
Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks.
PeterSymonds
(talk)
16:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
I'll try not to be too technical, but when you have a template which takes a parameter, such as {{
RFR|username|reason}}
, the parameters (in this case username and reason) are passed to the template to deal with. For technical reasons, there are problems when any parameter has an equals sign in it. You can get around it by prefixing the parameter with 1= for the first parameter, 2= for the second one, etc. In the above example, you would put {{RFR|1=AHRtbA==|reason}}. If you want a more technical explanation of the problem, see
meta:Help:Template#Parameters. Hope this helps! —
Tivedshambo (
t/
c)
16:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi - thank you for reverting vandalism on my talkpage. Vishnava talk 18:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism on my talk page. Any idea what caused it? Killkola ( talk) 19:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page. Imperial Star Destroyer ( talk) 15:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
A lot of talent wasted on that cleverness. I do admit to being "a gung ho son of a ******" at times, but it's all for God, country, and Wikipedia. Nice picture of me he picked! -- CliffC ( talk) 20:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
A big thanks from me as well. -- Pwnage8 ( talk) 22:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the message on my talk page -- I do appreciate it. I decided to roll it back, since I'm rather touched by the sentiment, but your work was welcome and I thank you. Accounting4Taste: talk 22:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi AHRtbA==! I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on Dreaming about a german boy- because: the page is not nonsense, as some sense can be made of it (it's possible to understand what it's saying), it is vandalism though If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Kingpin 13 ( talk) 14:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Removed speedy from this one. The numerous television credits is a credible claim of significance. May be an AfD candidate though. decltype ( talk) 21:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Why notify me of the CSD rather than the initial contributor?
There was some doubt in my mind as to whether or not to CSD that article myself. I moved it to the caps version and was going to put a stub template. However, I do agree that county executives may not be notable. I'll CSD the moved article. -- Tckma ( talk) 16:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. In reply to your email about your bot idea. It's a good idea, but it's also fairly common, so there are ways to do it already; firstly, you could just watchlist the page (if you manage to keep your watchlist tidy). Secondly, users can user {{ tb}} to let you know they've replied. Or thirdly (and this is the best way), you can download WikiBiff, which is similar to your bot idea. Cheers - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 16:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Now I suddenly understand what this thread was about! I guess I have to check my e-mail more often. Kingpin13's advise seems sound, and he has more experience than me with bots and MediaWiki. It's a neat idea, I think. decltype ( talk) 16:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Your statement on my talkpgae is out of context, so it's hard to understand what you're saying ;). But I've already spoken to the bot-op, and even if the bot gets approval on another wiki, that doesn't mean it's approved here. - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 21:04, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
No, my bot is not approved for WikiProject tagging. Fun Pika 18:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Was just taking a look at this, and had a couple of thoughts; Firstly, you shouldn't say "your" article in the message, as this implies
ownership where there is none. Secondly, you may want to consider not using the standard warning image, and instead going for something more neutral, such as a yellow/blue warning image, as the bot may be more prone to mistakes then other editors, and there might have been a reason for not warning. And thirdly, don't forget to
subst the warning template when you transclude it.
Also, you've been doing test edits with this account, but it would have been better to have waited until a
bot approvals group member approved it for trial, although editing in userspace is allowed. And may I ask why you've decided to not provide a link if it is a redlink? (At least I believe that's what you've done). Also, since the
BRfA has received no input from BAG, you may want to place {{
BAGAssistanceNeeded}} on the BRfA page. Cheers -
Kingpin
13 (
talk)
22:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
{{uw-create2|Somepage}}
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as [[Somepage]] to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with... etc.
Well, what's the exact problem with them? They seem mostly okay to me. You could propose a merge to one article, or you could start an WP:AfD with multiple articles. But the best thing to do if you're not too sure of if they should be deleted or not, is to start a thread at WT:AfD before nominating them, or discuss with a user who has significantly contributed to the pages (I can't say I know much about the subject, so I'm not the best person to ask in this case :)). - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 16:14, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
These pages should only be deleted if they are non-free images, which have been unused for at least 7 days. See WP:CSD#I5. There is already approval for bots to do this task, see this BRfA, although this bot is inactive, and Betacommandbot has been blocked. I'm not sure if there are any active bots doing this task. - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 18:51, 20 July 2009 (UTc)
Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in this log. - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 22:57, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Is there a way to sign up WP:CHICAGO to have a bot check WP:CHIBOTCATS for new articles on a regular basis? I read about your new bot in WP:POST.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 03:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Was this request ever completed? Because I see lots of disambiguation pages without the Disambiguation project's banner. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 21:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Rodney Howard Browne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 03:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
User:AHRtbA==/Commplaint, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AHRtbA==/Commplaint and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:AHRtbA==/Commplaint during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. John Vandenberg ( chat) 08:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello AHRtbA==, Please see Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#Bots_that_never_ran_to_deactivate regarding a discussion open pertaining to a bot account of yours. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 18:02, 3 December 2016 (UTC)
This user may have left Wikipedia. AHRtbA== has not edited Wikipedia since 23 September 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else. |
I use WikiBiff to notify me of changes on my Talk Page and Watchlist, even when I'm not on Wikipedia. |
Hello AHRtbA==.
I have noticed that you revert a lot of vandalism. Have you heard of
rollback before? It allows a user to revert vandalism much faster than by undo-ing it. I think you should
ask for it. I am not an admin, or I would give it to you myself. I wrote this just to let you know about the existence of rollback because before someone randomly gave it to me, I did not know it existed. If you ask for it, you should have no problem getting it, as you clearly have an excellent grasp of what constitutes vandalism. Good luck, and may the vandals fail...
J.delanoy
gabs
adds
15:38, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
I have
granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting
vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting
good-faith edits or to
revert-war. For information on rollback, see
Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and
Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks.
PeterSymonds
(talk)
16:01, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
I'll try not to be too technical, but when you have a template which takes a parameter, such as {{
RFR|username|reason}}
, the parameters (in this case username and reason) are passed to the template to deal with. For technical reasons, there are problems when any parameter has an equals sign in it. You can get around it by prefixing the parameter with 1= for the first parameter, 2= for the second one, etc. In the above example, you would put {{RFR|1=AHRtbA==|reason}}. If you want a more technical explanation of the problem, see
meta:Help:Template#Parameters. Hope this helps! —
Tivedshambo (
t/
c)
16:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi - thank you for reverting vandalism on my talkpage. Vishnava talk 18:29, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for reverting vandalism on my talk page. Any idea what caused it? Killkola ( talk) 19:53, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting vandalism on my page. Imperial Star Destroyer ( talk) 15:38, 10 June 2008 (UTC)
A lot of talent wasted on that cleverness. I do admit to being "a gung ho son of a ******" at times, but it's all for God, country, and Wikipedia. Nice picture of me he picked! -- CliffC ( talk) 20:37, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
A big thanks from me as well. -- Pwnage8 ( talk) 22:14, 27 June 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for reverting the message on my talk page -- I do appreciate it. I decided to roll it back, since I'm rather touched by the sentiment, but your work was welcome and I thank you. Accounting4Taste: talk 22:48, 28 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi AHRtbA==! I just wanted to inform you that I removed the speedy deletion tag you placed on Dreaming about a german boy- because: the page is not nonsense, as some sense can be made of it (it's possible to understand what it's saying), it is vandalism though If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact me. Kingpin 13 ( talk) 14:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Removed speedy from this one. The numerous television credits is a credible claim of significance. May be an AfD candidate though. decltype ( talk) 21:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
Why notify me of the CSD rather than the initial contributor?
There was some doubt in my mind as to whether or not to CSD that article myself. I moved it to the caps version and was going to put a stub template. However, I do agree that county executives may not be notable. I'll CSD the moved article. -- Tckma ( talk) 16:09, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi. In reply to your email about your bot idea. It's a good idea, but it's also fairly common, so there are ways to do it already; firstly, you could just watchlist the page (if you manage to keep your watchlist tidy). Secondly, users can user {{ tb}} to let you know they've replied. Or thirdly (and this is the best way), you can download WikiBiff, which is similar to your bot idea. Cheers - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 16:56, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
Now I suddenly understand what this thread was about! I guess I have to check my e-mail more often. Kingpin13's advise seems sound, and he has more experience than me with bots and MediaWiki. It's a neat idea, I think. decltype ( talk) 16:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
Your statement on my talkpgae is out of context, so it's hard to understand what you're saying ;). But I've already spoken to the bot-op, and even if the bot gets approval on another wiki, that doesn't mean it's approved here. - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 21:04, 11 July 2009 (UTC)
No, my bot is not approved for WikiProject tagging. Fun Pika 18:44, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Was just taking a look at this, and had a couple of thoughts; Firstly, you shouldn't say "your" article in the message, as this implies
ownership where there is none. Secondly, you may want to consider not using the standard warning image, and instead going for something more neutral, such as a yellow/blue warning image, as the bot may be more prone to mistakes then other editors, and there might have been a reason for not warning. And thirdly, don't forget to
subst the warning template when you transclude it.
Also, you've been doing test edits with this account, but it would have been better to have waited until a
bot approvals group member approved it for trial, although editing in userspace is allowed. And may I ask why you've decided to not provide a link if it is a redlink? (At least I believe that's what you've done). Also, since the
BRfA has received no input from BAG, you may want to place {{
BAGAssistanceNeeded}} on the BRfA page. Cheers -
Kingpin
13 (
talk)
22:09, 18 July 2009 (UTC)
{{uw-create2|Somepage}}
Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as [[Somepage]] to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with... etc.
Well, what's the exact problem with them? They seem mostly okay to me. You could propose a merge to one article, or you could start an WP:AfD with multiple articles. But the best thing to do if you're not too sure of if they should be deleted or not, is to start a thread at WT:AfD before nominating them, or discuss with a user who has significantly contributed to the pages (I can't say I know much about the subject, so I'm not the best person to ask in this case :)). - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 16:14, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
These pages should only be deleted if they are non-free images, which have been unused for at least 7 days. See WP:CSD#I5. There is already approval for bots to do this task, see this BRfA, although this bot is inactive, and Betacommandbot has been blocked. I'm not sure if there are any active bots doing this task. - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 18:51, 20 July 2009 (UTc)
Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in this log. - Kingpin 13 ( talk) 22:57, 17 August 2009 (UTC)
Is there a way to sign up WP:CHICAGO to have a bot check WP:CHIBOTCATS for new articles on a regular basis? I read about your new bot in WP:POST.-- TonyTheTiger ( t/ c/ bio/ WP:CHICAGO/ WP:LOTM) 03:37, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
Was this request ever completed? Because I see lots of disambiguation pages without the Disambiguation project's banner. Headbomb { ταλκ κοντριβς – WP Physics} 21:00, 17 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for uploading File:Rodney Howard Browne.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 ( talk) 03:49, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
User:AHRtbA==/Commplaint, a page you substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:AHRtbA==/Commplaint and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:AHRtbA==/Commplaint during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. John Vandenberg ( chat) 08:24, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hello AHRtbA==, Please see Wikipedia:Bot_owners'_noticeboard#Bots_that_never_ran_to_deactivate regarding a discussion open pertaining to a bot account of yours. Thank you, — xaosflux Talk 18:02, 3 December 2016 (UTC)