Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that
biographical information about living persons must not include
unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to
Paul Krugman, you must include proper
sources. If you don't know how to
cite a source, you may want to read
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you.
LK (
talk)
09:14, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons, as you did to
Clarence Dupnik. Thank you.
LK (
talk)
09:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Krugman's blog entry may well have been controversial, but citing the blog entry itself doesn't verify this at all. You have to find additional sources to prove that. Thanks. -- CutOffTies ( talk) 14:25, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons, as you did to
Lizz Winstead. Thank you. You need secondary sources. Find some respectable mainstream media sources that have written specifically about this issue and then propose some text on the article talk page.
Scjessey (
talk)
15:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Scjessey - I referenced an MSN.com article and her own twitter feed. This is neither unsourced nor poorly sourced. I am feeling you have taken a somewhat inappropriate feeling of ownership over this page. I will repost my entries and refer the matter for review if necessary. ABLegler ( talk) 02:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons, as you did to
Lizz Winstead. Thank you.
Scjessey (
talk)
17:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Information is neither un-referenced nor poorly referenced. Now with multiple sources. Despite the controversial nature of the information, it is factually correct and should remain as posted. Thank you. ABLegler ( talk) 17:54, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Seriously - you are giving ME a warning on edit wars? Look at your own behavior before you try to put this off on other people. In the spirit of reaching a "consensus" - aside from your own PERSONAL objections to the sources provided, do you feel that the information is inaccurate? ABLegler ( talk) 14:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Please be aware of Wikipedia's policy that
biographical information about living persons must not include
unsupported or inaccurate statements. Whenever you add possibly controversial statements about a living person to an article or any other Wikipedia page, as you did to
Paul Krugman, you must include proper
sources. If you don't know how to
cite a source, you may want to read
Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners for guidelines. Thank you.
LK (
talk)
09:14, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons, as you did to
Clarence Dupnik. Thank you.
LK (
talk)
09:16, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Hello, Krugman's blog entry may well have been controversial, but citing the blog entry itself doesn't verify this at all. You have to find additional sources to prove that. Thanks. -- CutOffTies ( talk) 14:25, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons, as you did to
Lizz Winstead. Thank you. You need secondary sources. Find some respectable mainstream media sources that have written specifically about this issue and then propose some text on the article talk page.
Scjessey (
talk)
15:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Scjessey - I referenced an MSN.com article and her own twitter feed. This is neither unsourced nor poorly sourced. I am feeling you have taken a somewhat inappropriate feeling of ownership over this page. I will repost my entries and refer the matter for review if necessary. ABLegler ( talk) 02:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Please do not add unreferenced or
poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about
living persons, as you did to
Lizz Winstead. Thank you.
Scjessey (
talk)
17:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Information is neither un-referenced nor poorly referenced. Now with multiple sources. Despite the controversial nature of the information, it is factually correct and should remain as posted. Thank you. ABLegler ( talk) 17:54, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Seriously - you are giving ME a warning on edit wars? Look at your own behavior before you try to put this off on other people. In the spirit of reaching a "consensus" - aside from your own PERSONAL objections to the sources provided, do you feel that the information is inaccurate? ABLegler ( talk) 14:03, 13 June 2013 (UTC)