- /Archive 1: 2019 – February 2024
______________________________________________________________________________
- News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections
- Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?
- Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24
- Comix: Generations
- Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
Adding Institute of Om to the article on OneTaste. I have researched this: Institute of OM is an entirely new business registration; it has different owners than OneTaste did; by trying to shoehorn the new company into the article of a defunct, closed company, you potentially open Wikipedia to legal action by the new company. You may write a new article on the new company, but you may not add it to OneTaste, which is shuttered. Skyerise ( talk) 22:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's fine. Media sources are ambiguous about Institute of OM, calling it a 'rebranding' ( in the Netflix doc and the Newsweek article I sourced) but also a 'sister organization'. (Newsweek). I was curious about the relationship and was following online sources, but I'm not heavily invested and trust that you've done your research, so will leave it out. ABF992 ( talk) 22:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- /Archive 1: 2019 – February 2024
______________________________________________________________________________
- News and notes: Democracy in action: multiple elections
- Special report: Will the new RfA reform come to the rescue of administrators?
- Arbitration report: Ruined temples for posterity to ponder over – arbitration from '22 to '24
- Comix: Generations
- Traffic report: Crawl out through the fallout, baby
- Technology report: New Page Patrol receives a much-needed software upgrade
- Deletion report: The lore of Kalloor
- In the media: National cable networks get in on the action arguing about what the first sentence of a Wikipedia article ought to say
- News from the WMF: Progress on the plan — how the Wikimedia Foundation advanced on its Annual Plan goals during the first half of fiscal year 2023-2024
- Recent research: ChatGPT did not kill Wikipedia, but might have reduced its growth
- Featured content: We didn't start the wiki
- Essay: No queerphobia
- Special report: RetractionBot is back to life!
- Traffic report: Chimps, Eurovision, and the return of the Baby Reindeer
- Comix: The Wikipediholic Family
- Concept: Palimpsestuous
- News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates
- Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board
- In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators
- Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna
- In the media: War and information in war and politics
- Sister projects: On editing Wikisource
- Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion
- Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos
- Humour: A joke
- Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps
- Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play
- Discussion report: Internet users flock to Wikipedia to debate its image policy over Trump raised-fist photo
- News and notes: Wikimedia community votes to ratify Movement Charter; Wikimedia Foundation opposes ratification
- Obituary: JamesR
- Crossword: Vaguely bird-shaped crossword
Adding Institute of Om to the article on OneTaste. I have researched this: Institute of OM is an entirely new business registration; it has different owners than OneTaste did; by trying to shoehorn the new company into the article of a defunct, closed company, you potentially open Wikipedia to legal action by the new company. You may write a new article on the new company, but you may not add it to OneTaste, which is shuttered. Skyerise ( talk) 22:06, 29 July 2024 (UTC)
- That's fine. Media sources are ambiguous about Institute of OM, calling it a 'rebranding' ( in the Netflix doc and the Newsweek article I sourced) but also a 'sister organization'. (Newsweek). I was curious about the relationship and was following online sources, but I'm not heavily invested and trust that you've done your research, so will leave it out. ABF992 ( talk) 22:18, 29 July 2024 (UTC)