Please review wiki edit warring policy here: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Edit_warring. If you'd like major changes to take place please refer them to the talk page. If you continue edit warring though I'm going to report you, at which point your IP address will likely get a ban. I don't want to do this, I also don't want to baby sit the page. Alcibiades979 ( talk) 16:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
I did, and it would appear that despite an overwhelming consensus that the article is in flagrant violation of Wikipedia's principles, the singular editorial view of one fringe group has been allowed full reign.
Look over my edits and honestly tell me that they are non-factual, unsourced, or contain more peacock phrases than the currently existing article. The current article literally quotes a far-right Singapore tabloid when describing the results of the OAS (which is not an official or non-partisan body) report, while ignoring later statements that the OAS made themselves that my edits have reflected. I did not remove any facts or events that are discussed in the original, and I did not dismiss those facts and views as the current article does, but instead placed them in their accurate context. If you want to ban me because I'm "vandalizing" the article by adding sources, describing disputed allegations as such, and removed leading and editorial phrases, than you have no right to accuse me of anything but being a more honest editor.
 | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Please review wiki edit warring policy here: /info/en/?search=Wikipedia:Edit_warring. If you'd like major changes to take place please refer them to the talk page. If you continue edit warring though I'm going to report you, at which point your IP address will likely get a ban. I don't want to do this, I also don't want to baby sit the page. Alcibiades979 ( talk) 16:08, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
I did, and it would appear that despite an overwhelming consensus that the article is in flagrant violation of Wikipedia's principles, the singular editorial view of one fringe group has been allowed full reign.
Look over my edits and honestly tell me that they are non-factual, unsourced, or contain more peacock phrases than the currently existing article. The current article literally quotes a far-right Singapore tabloid when describing the results of the OAS (which is not an official or non-partisan body) report, while ignoring later statements that the OAS made themselves that my edits have reflected. I did not remove any facts or events that are discussed in the original, and I did not dismiss those facts and views as the current article does, but instead placed them in their accurate context. If you want to ban me because I'm "vandalizing" the article by adding sources, describing disputed allegations as such, and removed leading and editorial phrases, than you have no right to accuse me of anything but being a more honest editor.
|
| This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |