From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 03:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Perhaps you remember...

...from the last time we crossed paths, that the edits of a blocked editor who is evading their block can be reverted on sight, with no penalty for multiple reverts. In other words, my edits reverting you are immune from the proscription against edit-warring, while every time you revert, your edit-warring count goes up. This is a battle you cannot win, since you know that you're English Patriot Man, however much you may protest (as you have protested each and every time your named socks have been discovered and blocked). You're dead as a doornail, friend, so you might as well give up - your current charade is over. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 04:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC) reply


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Stop icon

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Information icon Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 03:14, 26 December 2017 (UTC) reply

Perhaps you remember...

...from the last time we crossed paths, that the edits of a blocked editor who is evading their block can be reverted on sight, with no penalty for multiple reverts. In other words, my edits reverting you are immune from the proscription against edit-warring, while every time you revert, your edit-warring count goes up. This is a battle you cannot win, since you know that you're English Patriot Man, however much you may protest (as you have protested each and every time your named socks have been discovered and blocked). You're dead as a doornail, friend, so you might as well give up - your current charade is over. Beyond My Ken ( talk) 04:31, 26 December 2017 (UTC) reply



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook