Regardless of whether he's a foreigner or not, since he doesn't respond, doesn't that mean it's okay to change the map in the information box?
I'm not that familiar with the rules of English Wikipedia, the article appears to be set to "semi-protected", I don't have access to that editing feature.
163.136.36.58 (
talk)
09:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)reply
In my opinion, changing the map to a more accurate one will improve the overall quality of the article and encourage more people to become interested in Chinese history through Wikipedia.
163.136.36.56 (
talk)
10:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)reply
People sleep and do other things sometimes, you know. Making repeated changes against established consensus is considered disruptive, even if you think they're right.
Remsense诉10:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Then what is the “established consensus”? I never seen any people was agree using this weird picture to be the title map of
Article of Tang Dynasty.
Probably because no one found the arguments convincing and the current map remains fully sourced. At some point I do not know what to tell you because you didn't find it convincing when Kanguole or Aza24 make points, and you have some idea that we're treating China less favorably than other historical empires, which I probably have the opposite bias about frankly. Your argumentation never seems to land on whether this map is inaccurate, or whether it's not the best date to use, and you never make any arguments as to why it should be a different date. Believe it or not, I don't think the 1980 atlas is unreliable, though you've already assumed I do.
Remsense诉11:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Generally one would discuss potential changes to the lead image on a featured article first. My change back was done with the same level of caution, and I have at least implicit (and real, given the article's undergone peer review) consensus behind me, rather than drive-by swapping representational images without clear reason. I doubt @
Qiushufang would prefer their map on at the top of
Han dynasty.
Remsense诉09:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Regardless of whether he's a foreigner or not, since he doesn't respond, doesn't that mean it's okay to change the map in the information box?
I'm not that familiar with the rules of English Wikipedia, the article appears to be set to "semi-protected", I don't have access to that editing feature.
163.136.36.58 (
talk)
09:39, 8 May 2024 (UTC)reply
In my opinion, changing the map to a more accurate one will improve the overall quality of the article and encourage more people to become interested in Chinese history through Wikipedia.
163.136.36.56 (
talk)
10:01, 8 May 2024 (UTC)reply
People sleep and do other things sometimes, you know. Making repeated changes against established consensus is considered disruptive, even if you think they're right.
Remsense诉10:17, 8 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Then what is the “established consensus”? I never seen any people was agree using this weird picture to be the title map of
Article of Tang Dynasty.
Probably because no one found the arguments convincing and the current map remains fully sourced. At some point I do not know what to tell you because you didn't find it convincing when Kanguole or Aza24 make points, and you have some idea that we're treating China less favorably than other historical empires, which I probably have the opposite bias about frankly. Your argumentation never seems to land on whether this map is inaccurate, or whether it's not the best date to use, and you never make any arguments as to why it should be a different date. Believe it or not, I don't think the 1980 atlas is unreliable, though you've already assumed I do.
Remsense诉11:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)reply
Generally one would discuss potential changes to the lead image on a featured article first. My change back was done with the same level of caution, and I have at least implicit (and real, given the article's undergone peer review) consensus behind me, rather than drive-by swapping representational images without clear reason. I doubt @
Qiushufang would prefer their map on at the top of
Han dynasty.
Remsense诉09:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)reply