The deletion of an article you created, Upcoming neighbours plots, has been proposed for the following reason:
You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.
Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 04:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
A page you created, 2009 neighbours plots, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 05:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on 2009 neighbours plots requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -
Realkyhick (
Talk to me)
06:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated 2009 neighbours plots, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 neighbours plots. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Quantumobserver ( talk) 06:30, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
The article you created, 2009_neighbours_plots maybe deleted from Wikipedia.
There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.
There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb ( talk) 09:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please also note that Wikipedia does not accept original research (i.e information you got from your neighbour or friends) or material which has not been published first by reliable sources such as newspapers, journals, etc. Thanks, Sarah 04:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
|
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia's Awesome Reviews requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you.
TrulyBlue (
talk)
09:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
I think you're referring to the infobox 'soap character'. Easiest way is to look at an existing page with the info you want, for example the source of this page you edited recently.
Where is your source that there will be a fourth season and a spinoff? Also, there is no character named "Foxxy Lady". It's "Foxxy Love". -- Evildevil ( talk) 00:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Please give me one non-wikipedia link that shows anything you say is true. The chance that you're lying to me seems pretty high. Especially for someone who claims to be "on wikipedia 24/7". -- Evildevil ( talk) 06:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -- SineBot ( talk) 05:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
You're asking my permission for what reason? I'm not an admin. You don't need any permission from me. - Realkyhick ( Talk to me) 05:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Same for me. I have no authority to grant permission to anyone for anything. Quantumobserver ( talk) 00:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to The Simpsons (season 20). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Scorpion 0422 01:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at South Park, you will be blocked from editing. -- Scorpion 0422 04:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Tariq Aziz. Alexius08 ( talk) 07:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
I have blocked you indefinitely for vandalism and creating numerous hoax articles. Raul654 ( talk) 08:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
The deletion of an article you created, Upcoming neighbours plots, has been proposed for the following reason:
You are welcome to improve the article to meet Wikipedia's quality standards and remove the deletion notice from the article. You may also remove the notice if you disagree with the deletion, though in such cases, further discussion may take place at Articles for deletion, and the article may still be deleted if there is a consensus to do so.
Wikipedia has certain standards for inclusion that all articles must meet. Certain types of article must establish the notability of their subject by asserting its importance or significance. Additionally, since Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, content inappropriate for an encyclopedia, or content that would be more suited to somewhere else (such as a directory or social networking website) is not acceptable. See What Wikipedia is not for the relevant policy. You may wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 04:53, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
A page you created, 2009 neighbours plots, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is very short and provides little or no context.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. Blanchardb - Me• MyEars• MyMouth- timed 05:04, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on 2009 neighbours plots requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. -
Realkyhick (
Talk to me)
06:29, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
I have nominated 2009 neighbours plots, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2009 neighbours plots. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Quantumobserver ( talk) 06:30, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
The article you created, 2009_neighbours_plots maybe deleted from Wikipedia.
There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:
The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.
There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:
If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb ( talk) 09:41, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please also note that Wikipedia does not accept original research (i.e information you got from your neighbour or friends) or material which has not been published first by reliable sources such as newspapers, journals, etc. Thanks, Sarah 04:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)
|
A tag has been placed on Wikipedia's Awesome Reviews requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{
hangon}}
to the top of
the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on
the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact
one of these admins to request that they
userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you.
TrulyBlue (
talk)
09:20, 9 January 2009 (UTC)
I think you're referring to the infobox 'soap character'. Easiest way is to look at an existing page with the info you want, for example the source of this page you edited recently.
Where is your source that there will be a fourth season and a spinoff? Also, there is no character named "Foxxy Lady". It's "Foxxy Love". -- Evildevil ( talk) 00:10, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Please give me one non-wikipedia link that shows anything you say is true. The chance that you're lying to me seems pretty high. Especially for someone who claims to be "on wikipedia 24/7". -- Evildevil ( talk) 06:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! -- SineBot ( talk) 05:25, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
You're asking my permission for what reason? I'm not an admin. You don't need any permission from me. - Realkyhick ( Talk to me) 05:27, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Same for me. I have no authority to grant permission to anyone for anything. Quantumobserver ( talk) 00:49, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to The Simpsons (season 20). Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. -- Scorpion 0422 01:16, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at South Park, you will be blocked from editing. -- Scorpion 0422 04:04, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Tariq Aziz. Alexius08 ( talk) 07:57, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
I have blocked you indefinitely for vandalism and creating numerous hoax articles. Raul654 ( talk) 08:18, 22 January 2009 (UTC)