Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 03:40, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Please don't attack editors. Your argument is more compelling when you keep it to the issue at hand. AliveFreeHappy ( talk) 23:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Alerting you to a discussion [1] at the ANI noticeboard. SaltyBoatr get wet 02:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/71.184.184.238. Thank you. Ps. Remember that this does not mean that you are a sockpupet. This just means that you are suspected of being one and we have to clear up the matter and clear your name if you are not a sockpuppet. Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 05:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Read
WP:V where it says the burden of proof is on the person who wants to insert or reinsert material. You are
edit warring and reinserting unsourced or poorly sourced POV synthesis. Please stop inserting unsourced material without consensus. Also,
these comments were rude, please watch your tone, and remember to be
WP:POLITE.
Edit warring and
personal attacks are against Wikipedia policy. If you want to continue editing here, please refrain from doing either.
--
LK (
talk)
02:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gold standard. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Mcmatter ( talk| contrib) 04:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
and having been accused of being a gold bug, I do admit to putting LOTS of money on gold and silver stocks this decade. All I can say is that GOLD'S BEEN DARN GOOD TO ME! something dollars holders can't say! 71.184.184.238 ( talk) 03:56, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
quotes from gold standard talk page
Me * Saving is encouraged due to higher real interest rates since there is no central bank "printing gold" to drive them down.
village idjit - ccomment: unsourced and wrong
Me in response to comment by village idjit - That deserves a ROTFLMAO! You really think that you will have LESS incentive to save if the bank pays you 10% versus the current sub 1%?71.184.184.238 (talk) 23:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Me * Going into debt is discouraged as higher real interest rates make it more expensive to go into debt.
village idjit - comment: unsourced and wrong
Me in response to comment by village idji- That deserved a even bigger ROTFLMAO! You really think that you will go deeper into debt if you PAY 20% interest versus say 5%?
Any other wiki editors out there think that higher interest rates REWARD debtors and PUNISH savers? IF you do I have a special deal on a credit card with a "rewarding" 500% interest rate? If that's not rewarding enough I can make it 5,000% and for those "SPECIAL people" who need "special rewards" I can make that interest rate 50,000%.
Also: How many also think that GOLD can be can be "printed" with the liberal application of wood pulp and ink? 71.184.184.238 ( talk) 04:12, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjbPZAMked0
Stark - the more you owe the richer you are
Reporter - So why not go for it and borrow a few trillion next year so we can become richer
Stark - Get out of here - or I'll throw you out the window!
I felt for that reporter when i first saw thin, now with the above ban, I FEEL for him! 71.184.184.238 ( talk) 14:58, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Not sure if you are a soldier as well as a 2A proponent; if the latter you have presumably learned how to not shoot yourself in the foot. A good thing to also learn in Wikipedia, where the landscape is defined by the Wikipedia rules. North8000 ( talk) 00:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Looking at your recent style of editing I see a pattern of editing by revert, edit war edits. Here [2], here [3], here [4] and here [5]. This is destructive to the editing environment at Wikipedia. Please stop this habit. SaltyBoatr get wet 14:40, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Just in case what I wrote gets lost in the giant discussion at 2A, I wanted to let you know that I put the question of the SKOIEN quote at the OR noticeboard so we can get some uninvolved opinions on just this issue. I encourage you to go add your two cents there. AliveFreeHappy ( talk) 00:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Please cut back on the attitude on the talk page and your edit comments. You've cross the line more than once into personal attacks. You are also not allowed to alter other editor comments on the talk page in the manner you did (see WP:TPO - [6]. Comment on the edits all you like, but stop with the comments directed towards editors. You have a fairly hostile tone in many of your posts. Continuing on in this way will probably end up with this posted on WP:WQA. Ravensfire ( talk) 18:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
I was attempting to respond to the comment that was inadvertently deleted. My apologies. 71.184.184.238 ( talk) 11:37, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gold standard. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dabomb87 ( talk) 14:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gold Standard. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ravensfire ( talk) 00:25, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Synthesis.2C_edit_warring.2C_incivility_on_Gold_standard_by_71.184.184.238. Thank you. -- CRETOG8( t/ c) 03:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Jmlk
1
7
05:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. -- SineBot ( talk) 03:40, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors, as you did on Talk:Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. You are welcome to rephrase your comment as a civil criticism of the article. Thank you. Please don't attack editors. Your argument is more compelling when you keep it to the issue at hand. AliveFreeHappy ( talk) 23:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)
Alerting you to a discussion [1] at the ANI noticeboard. SaltyBoatr get wet 02:04, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/71.184.184.238. Thank you. Ps. Remember that this does not mean that you are a sockpupet. This just means that you are suspected of being one and we have to clear up the matter and clear your name if you are not a sockpuppet. Bobby122 Contact Me (C) 05:18, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Read
WP:V where it says the burden of proof is on the person who wants to insert or reinsert material. You are
edit warring and reinserting unsourced or poorly sourced POV synthesis. Please stop inserting unsourced material without consensus. Also,
these comments were rude, please watch your tone, and remember to be
WP:POLITE.
Edit warring and
personal attacks are against Wikipedia policy. If you want to continue editing here, please refrain from doing either.
--
LK (
talk)
02:40, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gold standard. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Mcmatter ( talk| contrib) 04:25, 22 July 2010 (UTC)
and having been accused of being a gold bug, I do admit to putting LOTS of money on gold and silver stocks this decade. All I can say is that GOLD'S BEEN DARN GOOD TO ME! something dollars holders can't say! 71.184.184.238 ( talk) 03:56, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
quotes from gold standard talk page
Me * Saving is encouraged due to higher real interest rates since there is no central bank "printing gold" to drive them down.
village idjit - ccomment: unsourced and wrong
Me in response to comment by village idjit - That deserves a ROTFLMAO! You really think that you will have LESS incentive to save if the bank pays you 10% versus the current sub 1%?71.184.184.238 (talk) 23:49, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
Me * Going into debt is discouraged as higher real interest rates make it more expensive to go into debt.
village idjit - comment: unsourced and wrong
Me in response to comment by village idji- That deserved a even bigger ROTFLMAO! You really think that you will go deeper into debt if you PAY 20% interest versus say 5%?
Any other wiki editors out there think that higher interest rates REWARD debtors and PUNISH savers? IF you do I have a special deal on a credit card with a "rewarding" 500% interest rate? If that's not rewarding enough I can make it 5,000% and for those "SPECIAL people" who need "special rewards" I can make that interest rate 50,000%.
Also: How many also think that GOLD can be can be "printed" with the liberal application of wood pulp and ink? 71.184.184.238 ( talk) 04:12, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UjbPZAMked0
Stark - the more you owe the richer you are
Reporter - So why not go for it and borrow a few trillion next year so we can become richer
Stark - Get out of here - or I'll throw you out the window!
I felt for that reporter when i first saw thin, now with the above ban, I FEEL for him! 71.184.184.238 ( talk) 14:58, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
Not sure if you are a soldier as well as a 2A proponent; if the latter you have presumably learned how to not shoot yourself in the foot. A good thing to also learn in Wikipedia, where the landscape is defined by the Wikipedia rules. North8000 ( talk) 00:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Looking at your recent style of editing I see a pattern of editing by revert, edit war edits. Here [2], here [3], here [4] and here [5]. This is destructive to the editing environment at Wikipedia. Please stop this habit. SaltyBoatr get wet 14:40, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
Just in case what I wrote gets lost in the giant discussion at 2A, I wanted to let you know that I put the question of the SKOIEN quote at the OR noticeboard so we can get some uninvolved opinions on just this issue. I encourage you to go add your two cents there. AliveFreeHappy ( talk) 00:55, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
Please cut back on the attitude on the talk page and your edit comments. You've cross the line more than once into personal attacks. You are also not allowed to alter other editor comments on the talk page in the manner you did (see WP:TPO - [6]. Comment on the edits all you like, but stop with the comments directed towards editors. You have a fairly hostile tone in many of your posts. Continuing on in this way will probably end up with this posted on WP:WQA. Ravensfire ( talk) 18:44, 27 August 2010 (UTC)
I was attempting to respond to the comment that was inadvertently deleted. My apologies. 71.184.184.238 ( talk) 11:37, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gold standard. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dabomb87 ( talk) 14:43, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Gold Standard. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If the edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Ravensfire ( talk) 00:25, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Synthesis.2C_edit_warring.2C_incivility_on_Gold_standard_by_71.184.184.238. Thank you. -- CRETOG8( t/ c) 03:52, 9 September 2010 (UTC)
{{
unblock|Your reason here}}
, but you should read the
guide to appealing blocks first.
Jmlk
1
7
05:45, 9 September 2010 (UTC)This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |