I have not much experience with Wikipedia editing, and may therefore be violating protocol, e.g. in posting this in the incorrect place. I address the author of the article Stephen C. Meyer. You must have heard the following a thousand times, but it falls to me to say it again. The word "pseudoscience" in the first sentence of the article is of course biased, subjective , argumentative and completely inappropriate (except in a quote) to an encyclopedia article. The characterization applied to Intelligent Design can be defended , of course, and also rebutted. The word "pseudoscience" does indeed belong in the section "Darwins's Doubt," where it is properly placed in quotes and attributed to Gareth Cook; further, this appropriate quote makes the impolite and intrusive appearance of the word "pseudoscientific" earlier in the article redundant. ~ Obugov ( talk) Obugov
- @ Obugov: I have copied that comment at Talk:Stephen C. Meyer#Pseudoscience, where the discussion can pursue. Thanks, — Paleo Neonate – 04:30, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
 | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
I have not much experience with Wikipedia editing, and may therefore be violating protocol, e.g. in posting this in the incorrect place. I address the author of the article Stephen C. Meyer. You must have heard the following a thousand times, but it falls to me to say it again. The word "pseudoscience" in the first sentence of the article is of course biased, subjective , argumentative and completely inappropriate (except in a quote) to an encyclopedia article. The characterization applied to Intelligent Design can be defended , of course, and also rebutted. The word "pseudoscience" does indeed belong in the section "Darwins's Doubt," where it is properly placed in quotes and attributed to Gareth Cook; further, this appropriate quote makes the impolite and intrusive appearance of the word "pseudoscientific" earlier in the article redundant. ~ Obugov ( talk) Obugov
- @ Obugov: I have copied that comment at Talk:Stephen C. Meyer#Pseudoscience, where the discussion can pursue. Thanks, — Paleo Neonate – 04:30, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
|
| This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |