I thought this link might be helpful. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 02:47, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- The New York Times article links to the Guardian article, which is one of the more hyperbolic reviews. The Guardian article states "These zestier strains of scaremongering are absent in the text itself, but they lurk in the shadows around a film outwardly non-insane enough to lure in the persuadable"
- So, no QAnon material in the movie itself. I've read a few of the most critical reviews, and none say, directly, that there is any conspiracy material in the movie. Jbmcb ( talk) 14:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
 | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
I thought this link might be helpful. Fred Zepelin ( talk) 02:47, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- The New York Times article links to the Guardian article, which is one of the more hyperbolic reviews. The Guardian article states "These zestier strains of scaremongering are absent in the text itself, but they lurk in the shadows around a film outwardly non-insane enough to lure in the persuadable"
- So, no QAnon material in the movie itself. I've read a few of the most critical reviews, and none say, directly, that there is any conspiracy material in the movie. Jbmcb ( talk) 14:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
|
| This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |