From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The source says "in the 20th century", but the previous version made it sound like current research and new measures vs CR.

Have added update with info on applicability of mice studies from 2017 review. The series of edits form Dec 17 and 18, 2019 began by addressing information in Humans section that dated from 2005, was really about mice, ambiguous, and contradicted by later study in 2006 (concerning longevity vs reproduction in mice). Whereas the age of a study is not the sole criteria for relevance unless contradicted, even then, it is helpful in some fields, especially CR, to see the ebb and flow of arguments. Thus many CR studies have extended lifespans.

December 2019

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Calorie restriction. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please don't 'beat a dead horse', WP:DEADHORSE. The source is not convincing, and the content is unnecessary. Zefr ( talk) 23:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Calorie restriction, you may be blocked from editing. Zefr ( talk) 00:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The source says "in the 20th century", but the previous version made it sound like current research and new measures vs CR.

Have added update with info on applicability of mice studies from 2017 review. The series of edits form Dec 17 and 18, 2019 began by addressing information in Humans section that dated from 2005, was really about mice, ambiguous, and contradicted by later study in 2006 (concerning longevity vs reproduction in mice). Whereas the age of a study is not the sole criteria for relevance unless contradicted, even then, it is helpful in some fields, especially CR, to see the ebb and flow of arguments. Thus many CR studies have extended lifespans.

December 2019

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Calorie restriction. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Please don't 'beat a dead horse', WP:DEADHORSE. The source is not convincing, and the content is unnecessary. Zefr ( talk) 23:20, 18 December 2019 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Calorie restriction, you may be blocked from editing. Zefr ( talk) 00:18, 22 December 2019 (UTC) reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.


Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook