Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Nick Adderley, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖
18:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- All of the source materials are:
- Newspaper quotes that subject has made himself
- Podcast interviews where in his own words he makes assertions of events that contradict the above
- Published books that he was interviewed for that again contradict the above
- All information is correctly sourced and simply linked together showing it cannot be reconciled and is the reason why the subject has been suspended from duty and is under criminal investigation. There is no valid reason why this page is being edited to make the subject look more favourable falsely citing no sources. Documents and evidence uploaded also demonstrate the validity of the source material.
62.253.87.150 (
talk)
12:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's that linking together which is the problem. It's called synthesis and is not allowed on this site. We also have to take care to comply with WP:BLPCRIME here. Nick Adderley is certainly a public figure, so we do include the fact he is under criminal investigation. However, unless he is convicted, we really gotta stop there because he is presumed innocent until then.
- I encourage you to publish your material elsewhere (a blog, YouTube video, etc.), but it isn't appropriate for Wikipedia. It's very interesting stuff, but it doesn't work for a Wikipedia article. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 04:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Nick Adderley, you may be
blocked from editing.
ThaddeusSholto (
talk)
20:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
 | This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate
your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to
Nick Adderley, it appears that you have added
original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses
combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a
reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the
tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. –
MJL
‐Talk‐
☖
18:55, 20 January 2024 (UTC)
- All of the source materials are:
- Newspaper quotes that subject has made himself
- Podcast interviews where in his own words he makes assertions of events that contradict the above
- Published books that he was interviewed for that again contradict the above
- All information is correctly sourced and simply linked together showing it cannot be reconciled and is the reason why the subject has been suspended from duty and is under criminal investigation. There is no valid reason why this page is being edited to make the subject look more favourable falsely citing no sources. Documents and evidence uploaded also demonstrate the validity of the source material.
62.253.87.150 (
talk)
12:09, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
- It's that linking together which is the problem. It's called synthesis and is not allowed on this site. We also have to take care to comply with WP:BLPCRIME here. Nick Adderley is certainly a public figure, so we do include the fact he is under criminal investigation. However, unless he is convicted, we really gotta stop there because he is presumed innocent until then.
- I encourage you to publish your material elsewhere (a blog, YouTube video, etc.), but it isn't appropriate for Wikipedia. It's very interesting stuff, but it doesn't work for a Wikipedia article. – MJL ‐Talk‐ ☖ 04:31, 22 January 2024 (UTC)
Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's
no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or
synthesis into articles, as you did at
Nick Adderley, you may be
blocked from editing.
ThaddeusSholto (
talk)
20:54, 21 January 2024 (UTC)
|
| This is the
discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's
IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may
create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users.
Registering also hides your IP address. |