This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hello! I noticed that in this edit you used the summary, "Source not needed; says "Alina/Teri" in the film's article". Please be aware that Wikipedia cannot cite itself. Instead, I have found and added a new, proper source for the data. — ATinySliver/ ATalkPage 21:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Your edits are mostly on your own page, your edits are tisruptive and you go in revert wars, I don't like that kind of attitude - would you stop disrupting people's work and stop relying on Wikipedia as a weblog rather than a serious web-encyclopedia vehicle? You are youngling, and you don't do shit rather than go in revert wars and edit your topblog userpage. I also tended to do much work on my UserPage, but that was mostly to project my interests and their impact on Wikipedia. Not to revert other people's work. Start act seriously otherwise it says bad.
I edited the Nikki Reed page for her divorce finalized date and you changed it. I read your reference article but it didn't list an actual date for their divorce. The article I found lists the 26th of December as the date. I was wondering why you changed it. Livsmommy81 ( talk) 15:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. When I typed "correct" size, I meant correct as in change. It was discussed previously (cannot recall where) but 1000 is too wide for many screens, 800 caters for all. Cheers.-- Carlos Rojas77 ( talk) 06:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I do not deal too much with user disputes but I know that we can have an impartial third editor take a look at the content dispute and render a (nonbinding) opinion, per WP:3. There are more serious alternatives like the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard, but I am not sure that would be very useful since the user has stopped commenting on the Hugh Jackman talk page. I don't think the user has technically violated WP:3RR yet but if he does, then he could potentially be blocked for disruptive editing. If that is the case, there is this page to check out. Hope that helps a bit! wia ( talk) 11:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
—CraigyDavi ( T∙ C∙ @) 10:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Friend, why aren't the tours not important for the article. Have a look at the articles of Eminem and Thirty Seconds to Mars. Mike:Golu · [ Confidential message ] 09:28, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
I partially revered your edit to the Linkin Park article pertaining to the member order specified in the Infobox. I feel I owe you an explanation. Per Template:Infobox musical artist#current_members, the standard documentation states that we should list band members by 'order of joining' and then alphabetical order. While I agree with your edits to standardize the order of band member sections, there is already a written guideline that defines the order we should use for bandmates in the infobox. Thank you for your time. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 04:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, It is the normal practice to use AFL season dates as the relevant years in the infobox - ie Ross Lyon is listed as being at St Kilda until 2011, Freo from 2012, not both in 2011, despite being recruited in September 2011. Showing that he missed the 2014 season is much more accurate and informative than saying he coached continually from 2011. Also, I didn't mean to hit the revert button, but the screen links jumped as I went to click the undo button, so I was unable to explain this in the edit summary. The-Pope ( talk) 09:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
I strongly disagree. Nu metal was the last strongly successful push of metal into the mainstream. According to records shown by the discography page, they seem to suggest that The Burning Red brought the most success so far. I may, however, still be incorrect, so I will not re-add my edit due to this dispute. I wanted to just state my opinion, even if it doesn't change anything. Thank you for your time. DannyMusicEditor ( talk) 18:50, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Don't worry; I haven't changed anything on you again! I'm just trying to garner your advice. I'm working on expanding the Filming section of the Furious 7 article, with more information on production, etc.; when which scenes were filmed and where. It'd be similar to the Filming section in the article for The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, the information in which I did most of the research for (and which I am still very proud of). Unlike that article, however, the sources I've gathered for this one -- but have not yet implemented -- come from completely different places: Filming notices, B-roll footage with clapperboard dates, interviews with certain members of the cast, casting calls, and, strangest of all, Twitter -- specific Tweets from James Wan, Dwayne Johnson, Ronda Rousey, and John Brotherton being some of the ones I've collated.
Due to the wide range of sources, I am sort of at a loss as to how to properly cite each one -- especially the Twitter tweets and B-roll footage (which is up on YouTube). I started to put up info from the second week of the Georgia shoot a week or two ago, but at the moment I'd like your advice on how to proceed. Stolengood ( talk) 07:17, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Could you please explain to me why you keep reverting an edit that I made to the article on Natalie Portman. Could you please address the relevant section in the Talk page, rather than make instantaneous deletions. Please note that Ms. Portman is noted as being "Israeli-born" in the main article, so why do you keep deleting the same fact in the info-box??? Barmispain ( talk) 08:13, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
I had mistakenly thought I was on the video game's page. Thanks for pointing that out.-- Taeyebaar ( talk) 05:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
If mentioning to this issue (being widely regarded as sexually attractive) is not appropriate n its non-noteworthy trivia so why is this mentioned in other actors bio? for example: /info/en/?search=Johnny_Depp Set fire 2 de rain ( talk) 08:45, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
I dont think think that they are melodic hardcore dude they are mostly punk rock
Wonderdisk 93 ( talk) 23:28, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Dude i know that but my point is that they are alright just listen to one of their song for example alright just were they sing about animal rights that what makes them punk rock just look and listen to the music video dude so what you think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jg9443 ( talk • contribs) 14:45, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Dude i know that but my point is that they are alright just listen to one of their song for example alright just were they sing about animal rights that what makes them punk rock just look and listen to the music video dude so what you think. Jg9443 ( talk) 14:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Just to let you know if you change i change it as well this would stop until you just leave it to punk rock and that"s it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jg9443 ( talk • contribs) 17:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
I apologize for my threats i had about 3 days to think about it i am deeply sorry is that i felt that i really thought they were punk rock and my begging and pleading for that i am sorry i am being the bigger man here dude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jg9443 ( talk • contribs) 20:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
sorry to bother you i just wanted to let you know just look at their music videos and albums their in the punk rock community and i will give to you they are melodic hardcore songs in them but it does not mean that i am begging if you can look them up their music and albums please just look it up. Jg9443 ( talk) 01:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
dude i was wondering if i have your permission to move your article? Jg9443 ( talk) 01:17, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
not trying to edit i am just asking dude. Jg9443 ( talk) 10:51, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
look dude sorry again i get emotional is that i love this band i believe that they are punk rock and somtimes i admit that i could be a bit stubborn Jg9443 ( talk) 23:55, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Dude you said that i have to get evidence to prove that they are punk rock here it is help is on the way and i dont want to be here anymore and give it all i dont have the music videos to send you a link but i hope you seen the music video just like rise against famous punk rock bands talk and support animal and human rights just as anti flag ,minor threat, against me, nofx rise against and much more those are my evidence if you want you can look up political punk rock bands. Jg9443 ( talk) 04:42, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
dude i have left something on your talk page i have got evidence. Jg9443 ( talk) 22:09, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
just asking if i come up with a solution that my version of rise against in simple wikipedia if i can move it to your article and you can put your article in my simple wikipedia article Jg9443 ( talk) 17:32, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Why remove what i edited? It was incorrect before and now you have made it incorrect again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.223.234.58 ( talk) 09:46, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello 4TheWynne! I redirected the page Fast 8 back to Furious 7 per WP:NFF. Please do not create the page again until the filming begins on the project. And if you want to contribute the page, please do so at Draft:Furious 8 until production begins. Thanks and I hope you understand. -- Captain Assassin! « T ♦ C ♦ G» 04:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestions. I have gone to the talk pages of several Wikipedia pages already because of your help. I am now more firmilliar with editing on Wikipedia.
Thanks – Zackmadd ( talk) 22:11, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
It does help. I mainly edit band pages but do work on tv show pages too. I have been looking up policies. Talk pages have helped me the most. On a different note I would like to say good job on your Aspect band page. It is put together very well. Zackmadd ( talk) 18:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Sorry dude i was just trying to help. I was trying to show more detail of the bands past history with demos, eps, etc. ill stop with doing the other releases and add more detail from now on. Sorry again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cameronsmiley2345qwerty ( talk • contribs) 18:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out the need to source the Foo Fighters piece. Still learning, and glad to have constructive guidance. I reposted with a citation. Jordan Jones ( talk) 12:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I got the evidence that rise against is and should be rise against is an Chicago punk rock band because they are verry poltical like anti flag and sometime green day and also what it says on your text of rise against they are straight edge including Barnes and also tim mclrath supports animal rights. Jg9443 ( talk) 20:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
So it made me think that all that i have been doing is stating my opinion all the time and bothering you i felt at this time i wanted to compromise i will not change the genre i"ll keep it the way it is but like it says on your edit page of rise against Do not change the genre with providing resources well i got one that"s helpfull so how about this? Rise Against is a Chicago punk rock band on your Wikipedia and on my simple Wikipedia i"ll change it to Rise against is an american melodic hardcore band and lets be bygones be bygones. Jg9443 ( talk) 17:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
So it made me think that all i have been doing is stating my opinion thees past 3 months and witch it says on the rise against edit page do not change the genre unless you have provided sources so i will not bother you or change the genre"s but this title of the article should be helpful so hear it goes instead of rise against is a american melodic hardcore band it should be rise against is a Chicago punk rock if you do that on your Wikipedia page i"ll change to rise against is american melodic hardcore band in my simple Wikipedia page lets be bygones be bygones. Jg9443 ( talk) 01:56, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
I really got evidence that they are not American punk rock or American melodic hardcore no they are a Chicago Punk rock band this is my proof At the Adelaide show, Chicago punk rockers Rise Against opened for the Foo ... 50 Rock Facts You May Not Know August 14, 2015 7:48 AM. Jg9443 ( talk) 20:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
And also i almost forgot here"s the video to prove it https://www.punknews.org/article/53129/rise-against-historia-calamitatum Jg9443 ( talk) 20:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
I was wondering enough with the fighting enough me having to brother i was wondering if we can switch like i put my wikipedia simple english page of rise against and send it to your page and you can put a sub page just in case your asking if i really don"t have evidence i do i got the source everthing and to prove that rise against is a chicago punk rock band look it Chicago-based punk act has taken in some time.
Read more at http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/rise-againsts-the-black-market-cracks-u-s Jg9443 ( talk) 02:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
I hope I'm doing this right. You deleted an edit I made for an actor's bio because I forgot to include the link. This time I included the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.179.143.159 ( talk) 02:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
I just saw you revert my changes in the Metallica article. I removed Guns N' Roses in the "associated acts" section because the members of Metallica were never members of Guns N' Roses. I thought "associated acts" is supposed to be "for closely interconnected bands, sharing two or more members, sharing album projects, or touring together as a single collaboration act", and none of the members of Metallica were ever members of Guns N' Roses, as a result, I reverted your changes. MetalDiablo666 ( talk) 05:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Regarding your reversion to the edits on Dwayne Johnson...
1) Please do not do simple reverts on changes where multiple edits are made if you are meaning to only revert a single thing. You remove edits that have nothing to do with the change in question.
2) The relationship between Johnson and the Anoaʻi family is as well documented as just about anything. (As someone who claims to be a fan, it's odd that you would be unaware of this.) If you feel that this fact is disputable enough to warrant removal from Wikipedia, you will need to edit not only the Anoaʻi family article, but virtually every article for every member of that family...as they all mention Johnson as being part of that family tree. (Not to mention the " Relatives in wrestling" section on the Dwayne Johnson page itself).
I have added back the edits you reverted, as they are not at all controversial, and easily verified.
If you have an issue with their inclusion, please open a section for discussion on the appropriate talk page.
Thank you.
-- Wikisian ( talk) 23:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
You jut deleted one of my edits because you said it was poorly referenced or unrefernced work? Could you help me by letting me know what to fix? -- Joshewuh2 ( talk) 23:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. I am working on the sources now. Early Life sections really don't have a max limit however and I am trying to balance out the sections! Thanks again for the help!! -- Joshewuh2 ( talk) 00:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Joshua, in you edit summary you wrote when reverting my edit to Natalie Portman you wrote --- ""Director" and "producer" are most often used in this context anyway.
I say that's bollocks, and since it is your contention you'll have to prove it before anybody should accept it. So go ahead and prove that "director" and "producer" are most often used in the context of motion picture films. Is the fact you are an actor by vocation a source of bias? Are you sure you're not insisting you are right and my edit needs to be reverted because your ego. Listen mate, I've worked in the advertising business for 30 years, and generally speaking actors have considerable egos that frequently get in the way of getting the job done. You look like yet another egotist to me. Prove your point is true, or you'll have to accept you're not right about everything you think you are.
Arbo (
talk)
08:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
Hello! I noticed that in this edit you used the summary, "Source not needed; says "Alina/Teri" in the film's article". Please be aware that Wikipedia cannot cite itself. Instead, I have found and added a new, proper source for the data. — ATinySliver/ ATalkPage 21:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
Your edits are mostly on your own page, your edits are tisruptive and you go in revert wars, I don't like that kind of attitude - would you stop disrupting people's work and stop relying on Wikipedia as a weblog rather than a serious web-encyclopedia vehicle? You are youngling, and you don't do shit rather than go in revert wars and edit your topblog userpage. I also tended to do much work on my UserPage, but that was mostly to project my interests and their impact on Wikipedia. Not to revert other people's work. Start act seriously otherwise it says bad.
I edited the Nikki Reed page for her divorce finalized date and you changed it. I read your reference article but it didn't list an actual date for their divorce. The article I found lists the 26th of December as the date. I was wondering why you changed it. Livsmommy81 ( talk) 15:22, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Hi there. When I typed "correct" size, I meant correct as in change. It was discussed previously (cannot recall where) but 1000 is too wide for many screens, 800 caters for all. Cheers.-- Carlos Rojas77 ( talk) 06:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I do not deal too much with user disputes but I know that we can have an impartial third editor take a look at the content dispute and render a (nonbinding) opinion, per WP:3. There are more serious alternatives like the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard, but I am not sure that would be very useful since the user has stopped commenting on the Hugh Jackman talk page. I don't think the user has technically violated WP:3RR yet but if he does, then he could potentially be blocked for disruptive editing. If that is the case, there is this page to check out. Hope that helps a bit! wia ( talk) 11:39, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
—CraigyDavi ( T∙ C∙ @) 10:26, 28 February 2015 (UTC)Friend, why aren't the tours not important for the article. Have a look at the articles of Eminem and Thirty Seconds to Mars. Mike:Golu · [ Confidential message ] 09:28, 6 March 2015 (UTC)
I partially revered your edit to the Linkin Park article pertaining to the member order specified in the Infobox. I feel I owe you an explanation. Per Template:Infobox musical artist#current_members, the standard documentation states that we should list band members by 'order of joining' and then alphabetical order. While I agree with your edits to standardize the order of band member sections, there is already a written guideline that defines the order we should use for bandmates in the infobox. Thank you for your time. -- StarScream1007 ►Talk 04:23, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
Hi there, It is the normal practice to use AFL season dates as the relevant years in the infobox - ie Ross Lyon is listed as being at St Kilda until 2011, Freo from 2012, not both in 2011, despite being recruited in September 2011. Showing that he missed the 2014 season is much more accurate and informative than saying he coached continually from 2011. Also, I didn't mean to hit the revert button, but the screen links jumped as I went to click the undo button, so I was unable to explain this in the edit summary. The-Pope ( talk) 09:18, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
I strongly disagree. Nu metal was the last strongly successful push of metal into the mainstream. According to records shown by the discography page, they seem to suggest that The Burning Red brought the most success so far. I may, however, still be incorrect, so I will not re-add my edit due to this dispute. I wanted to just state my opinion, even if it doesn't change anything. Thank you for your time. DannyMusicEditor ( talk) 18:50, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
Don't worry; I haven't changed anything on you again! I'm just trying to garner your advice. I'm working on expanding the Filming section of the Furious 7 article, with more information on production, etc.; when which scenes were filmed and where. It'd be similar to the Filming section in the article for The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus, the information in which I did most of the research for (and which I am still very proud of). Unlike that article, however, the sources I've gathered for this one -- but have not yet implemented -- come from completely different places: Filming notices, B-roll footage with clapperboard dates, interviews with certain members of the cast, casting calls, and, strangest of all, Twitter -- specific Tweets from James Wan, Dwayne Johnson, Ronda Rousey, and John Brotherton being some of the ones I've collated.
Due to the wide range of sources, I am sort of at a loss as to how to properly cite each one -- especially the Twitter tweets and B-roll footage (which is up on YouTube). I started to put up info from the second week of the Georgia shoot a week or two ago, but at the moment I'd like your advice on how to proceed. Stolengood ( talk) 07:17, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Could you please explain to me why you keep reverting an edit that I made to the article on Natalie Portman. Could you please address the relevant section in the Talk page, rather than make instantaneous deletions. Please note that Ms. Portman is noted as being "Israeli-born" in the main article, so why do you keep deleting the same fact in the info-box??? Barmispain ( talk) 08:13, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
I had mistakenly thought I was on the video game's page. Thanks for pointing that out.-- Taeyebaar ( talk) 05:25, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
If mentioning to this issue (being widely regarded as sexually attractive) is not appropriate n its non-noteworthy trivia so why is this mentioned in other actors bio? for example: /info/en/?search=Johnny_Depp Set fire 2 de rain ( talk) 08:45, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
I dont think think that they are melodic hardcore dude they are mostly punk rock
Wonderdisk 93 ( talk) 23:28, 22 June 2015 (UTC)
Dude i know that but my point is that they are alright just listen to one of their song for example alright just were they sing about animal rights that what makes them punk rock just look and listen to the music video dude so what you think. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jg9443 ( talk • contribs) 14:45, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Dude i know that but my point is that they are alright just listen to one of their song for example alright just were they sing about animal rights that what makes them punk rock just look and listen to the music video dude so what you think. Jg9443 ( talk) 14:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)
Just to let you know if you change i change it as well this would stop until you just leave it to punk rock and that"s it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jg9443 ( talk • contribs) 17:32, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
I apologize for my threats i had about 3 days to think about it i am deeply sorry is that i felt that i really thought they were punk rock and my begging and pleading for that i am sorry i am being the bigger man here dude. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jg9443 ( talk • contribs) 20:56, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
sorry to bother you i just wanted to let you know just look at their music videos and albums their in the punk rock community and i will give to you they are melodic hardcore songs in them but it does not mean that i am begging if you can look them up their music and albums please just look it up. Jg9443 ( talk) 01:20, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
dude i was wondering if i have your permission to move your article? Jg9443 ( talk) 01:17, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
not trying to edit i am just asking dude. Jg9443 ( talk) 10:51, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
look dude sorry again i get emotional is that i love this band i believe that they are punk rock and somtimes i admit that i could be a bit stubborn Jg9443 ( talk) 23:55, 8 August 2015 (UTC)
Dude you said that i have to get evidence to prove that they are punk rock here it is help is on the way and i dont want to be here anymore and give it all i dont have the music videos to send you a link but i hope you seen the music video just like rise against famous punk rock bands talk and support animal and human rights just as anti flag ,minor threat, against me, nofx rise against and much more those are my evidence if you want you can look up political punk rock bands. Jg9443 ( talk) 04:42, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
dude i have left something on your talk page i have got evidence. Jg9443 ( talk) 22:09, 9 August 2015 (UTC)
just asking if i come up with a solution that my version of rise against in simple wikipedia if i can move it to your article and you can put your article in my simple wikipedia article Jg9443 ( talk) 17:32, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Why remove what i edited? It was incorrect before and now you have made it incorrect again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 73.223.234.58 ( talk) 09:46, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
Hello 4TheWynne! I redirected the page Fast 8 back to Furious 7 per WP:NFF. Please do not create the page again until the filming begins on the project. And if you want to contribute the page, please do so at Draft:Furious 8 until production begins. Thanks and I hope you understand. -- Captain Assassin! « T ♦ C ♦ G» 04:16, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Thank you for your suggestions. I have gone to the talk pages of several Wikipedia pages already because of your help. I am now more firmilliar with editing on Wikipedia.
Thanks – Zackmadd ( talk) 22:11, 26 July 2015 (UTC)
It does help. I mainly edit band pages but do work on tv show pages too. I have been looking up policies. Talk pages have helped me the most. On a different note I would like to say good job on your Aspect band page. It is put together very well. Zackmadd ( talk) 18:35, 28 July 2015 (UTC)
Sorry dude i was just trying to help. I was trying to show more detail of the bands past history with demos, eps, etc. ill stop with doing the other releases and add more detail from now on. Sorry again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cameronsmiley2345qwerty ( talk • contribs) 18:29, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for pointing out the need to source the Foo Fighters piece. Still learning, and glad to have constructive guidance. I reposted with a citation. Jordan Jones ( talk) 12:28, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
I got the evidence that rise against is and should be rise against is an Chicago punk rock band because they are verry poltical like anti flag and sometime green day and also what it says on your text of rise against they are straight edge including Barnes and also tim mclrath supports animal rights. Jg9443 ( talk) 20:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
So it made me think that all that i have been doing is stating my opinion all the time and bothering you i felt at this time i wanted to compromise i will not change the genre i"ll keep it the way it is but like it says on your edit page of rise against Do not change the genre with providing resources well i got one that"s helpfull so how about this? Rise Against is a Chicago punk rock band on your Wikipedia and on my simple Wikipedia i"ll change it to Rise against is an american melodic hardcore band and lets be bygones be bygones. Jg9443 ( talk) 17:56, 23 September 2015 (UTC)
So it made me think that all i have been doing is stating my opinion thees past 3 months and witch it says on the rise against edit page do not change the genre unless you have provided sources so i will not bother you or change the genre"s but this title of the article should be helpful so hear it goes instead of rise against is a american melodic hardcore band it should be rise against is a Chicago punk rock if you do that on your Wikipedia page i"ll change to rise against is american melodic hardcore band in my simple Wikipedia page lets be bygones be bygones. Jg9443 ( talk) 01:56, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
I really got evidence that they are not American punk rock or American melodic hardcore no they are a Chicago Punk rock band this is my proof At the Adelaide show, Chicago punk rockers Rise Against opened for the Foo ... 50 Rock Facts You May Not Know August 14, 2015 7:48 AM. Jg9443 ( talk) 20:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
And also i almost forgot here"s the video to prove it https://www.punknews.org/article/53129/rise-against-historia-calamitatum Jg9443 ( talk) 20:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
I was wondering enough with the fighting enough me having to brother i was wondering if we can switch like i put my wikipedia simple english page of rise against and send it to your page and you can put a sub page just in case your asking if i really don"t have evidence i do i got the source everthing and to prove that rise against is a chicago punk rock band look it Chicago-based punk act has taken in some time.
Read more at http://www.blabbermouth.net/news/rise-againsts-the-black-market-cracks-u-s Jg9443 ( talk) 02:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)
I hope I'm doing this right. You deleted an edit I made for an actor's bio because I forgot to include the link. This time I included the link. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.179.143.159 ( talk) 02:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
I just saw you revert my changes in the Metallica article. I removed Guns N' Roses in the "associated acts" section because the members of Metallica were never members of Guns N' Roses. I thought "associated acts" is supposed to be "for closely interconnected bands, sharing two or more members, sharing album projects, or touring together as a single collaboration act", and none of the members of Metallica were ever members of Guns N' Roses, as a result, I reverted your changes. MetalDiablo666 ( talk) 05:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current
Arbitration Committee election. The
Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia
arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose
site bans,
topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The
arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to
review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on
the voting page. For the Election committee,
MediaWiki message delivery (
talk)
17:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Regarding your reversion to the edits on Dwayne Johnson...
1) Please do not do simple reverts on changes where multiple edits are made if you are meaning to only revert a single thing. You remove edits that have nothing to do with the change in question.
2) The relationship between Johnson and the Anoaʻi family is as well documented as just about anything. (As someone who claims to be a fan, it's odd that you would be unaware of this.) If you feel that this fact is disputable enough to warrant removal from Wikipedia, you will need to edit not only the Anoaʻi family article, but virtually every article for every member of that family...as they all mention Johnson as being part of that family tree. (Not to mention the " Relatives in wrestling" section on the Dwayne Johnson page itself).
I have added back the edits you reverted, as they are not at all controversial, and easily verified.
If you have an issue with their inclusion, please open a section for discussion on the appropriate talk page.
Thank you.
-- Wikisian ( talk) 23:17, 29 November 2015 (UTC)
You jut deleted one of my edits because you said it was poorly referenced or unrefernced work? Could you help me by letting me know what to fix? -- Joshewuh2 ( talk) 23:23, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for the help. I am working on the sources now. Early Life sections really don't have a max limit however and I am trying to balance out the sections! Thanks again for the help!! -- Joshewuh2 ( talk) 00:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)
Joshua, in you edit summary you wrote when reverting my edit to Natalie Portman you wrote --- ""Director" and "producer" are most often used in this context anyway.
I say that's bollocks, and since it is your contention you'll have to prove it before anybody should accept it. So go ahead and prove that "director" and "producer" are most often used in the context of motion picture films. Is the fact you are an actor by vocation a source of bias? Are you sure you're not insisting you are right and my edit needs to be reverted because your ego. Listen mate, I've worked in the advertising business for 30 years, and generally speaking actors have considerable egos that frequently get in the way of getting the job done. You look like yet another egotist to me. Prove your point is true, or you'll have to accept you're not right about everything you think you are.
Arbo (
talk)
08:22, 21 December 2015 (UTC)