Fir e Fox 17:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Since Angelina has claimed to be an atheist, I've included her under that category. For reasons unknown, you've seen fit to reverse my edit and to accuse me of vandalism. http://www.nndb.com/people/493/000023424/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.15.23 ( talk • contribs)
No problem, you're a popular guy tonight. ;-) Leithp (talk) 21:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
My pleasure. That vandal seems extra bent on wrecking your page - so foolish. Anyway, cheers. PJM 13:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Seen your reference about your sig. having problems. I have found a bug that does indeed mess up your sig., causing people to be falsely accused of being sockpuppets, and have reported this matter. Cheers. Martial Law 01:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC) :)
I have found some kind of glitch that can mess up your online signature, causing someone to be falsely declared to be a sockpuppet. This has been posted on WP:AN as well. Other people has also reported the existance of this bug. This is the glitch: You sign on as Martial Law, the sig looks like this: 123.233.567.45. Have been told that this is a known bug. You enable Cookies, clean out your browser caches, which I've done, and yet this bug still exists. Martial Law 22:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Is this the problem you're experiencing ? Martial Law 22:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
any administrators who are involved in the dispute must not edit this page whilst it is protected
Reminds me of you...
This user avoids insults for vandalism, moving straight to actual bodily harm |
Benon 14:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Eeeeehehehehe, here I am vandalizing FireFox's talk page! What a wicked, wicked fool I am! Eeeehehehehe!!!!! Search 4 Lancer 17:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
You deleted Kung hei fat choi simply because someone put a speedy tag on it without looking at the discussions around it. The criteria for speedy deletes on redirects [1] didn't apply to that article. Please verify speedy deletes. SchmuckyTheCat 20:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Yeah so someone already told this to me... I'm just a dumb slashdotter trying out the Wikipedia. Didn't realize it was so territorial what with y'all peeing all over my carpet. Don't get your skirt out of whack, settle down, have a beer. We're just here from Slashdot to look around. Judging by the number of hilarious edits on the page in question... I'd say my comment ain't far off the mark.
What does rvs mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.42.7.170 ( talk • contribs)
So are you saying you think my dialog with you is Strawberries?
That seems awfully rude. I thought you weren't supposed to "bite the n00bs"?
I asked a legitmate question, your rules and regulations don't permit you to just ignore me as such, or revert my comments. How am I supposed to learn the ropes if y'all revert me instead of talk to me?
Fir e Fox 17:33, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
Since Angelina has claimed to be an atheist, I've included her under that category. For reasons unknown, you've seen fit to reverse my edit and to accuse me of vandalism. http://www.nndb.com/people/493/000023424/ —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.2.15.23 ( talk • contribs)
No problem, you're a popular guy tonight. ;-) Leithp (talk) 21:27, 19 December 2005 (UTC)
My pleasure. That vandal seems extra bent on wrecking your page - so foolish. Anyway, cheers. PJM 13:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Seen your reference about your sig. having problems. I have found a bug that does indeed mess up your sig., causing people to be falsely accused of being sockpuppets, and have reported this matter. Cheers. Martial Law 01:40, 20 December 2005 (UTC) :)
I have found some kind of glitch that can mess up your online signature, causing someone to be falsely declared to be a sockpuppet. This has been posted on WP:AN as well. Other people has also reported the existance of this bug. This is the glitch: You sign on as Martial Law, the sig looks like this: 123.233.567.45. Have been told that this is a known bug. You enable Cookies, clean out your browser caches, which I've done, and yet this bug still exists. Martial Law 22:02, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Is this the problem you're experiencing ? Martial Law 22:21, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
any administrators who are involved in the dispute must not edit this page whilst it is protected
Reminds me of you...
This user avoids insults for vandalism, moving straight to actual bodily harm |
Benon 14:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Eeeeehehehehe, here I am vandalizing FireFox's talk page! What a wicked, wicked fool I am! Eeeehehehehe!!!!! Search 4 Lancer 17:14, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
You deleted Kung hei fat choi simply because someone put a speedy tag on it without looking at the discussions around it. The criteria for speedy deletes on redirects [1] didn't apply to that article. Please verify speedy deletes. SchmuckyTheCat 20:08, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
Yeah so someone already told this to me... I'm just a dumb slashdotter trying out the Wikipedia. Didn't realize it was so territorial what with y'all peeing all over my carpet. Don't get your skirt out of whack, settle down, have a beer. We're just here from Slashdot to look around. Judging by the number of hilarious edits on the page in question... I'd say my comment ain't far off the mark.
What does rvs mean? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.42.7.170 ( talk • contribs)
So are you saying you think my dialog with you is Strawberries?
That seems awfully rude. I thought you weren't supposed to "bite the n00bs"?
I asked a legitmate question, your rules and regulations don't permit you to just ignore me as such, or revert my comments. How am I supposed to learn the ropes if y'all revert me instead of talk to me?