![]() |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Criticism of Wikipedia you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
TompaDompa --
TompaDompa (
talk) 21:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi 3vvww661! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at
Criticism of Wikipedia that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
TompaDompa (
talk) 21:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Criticism of Wikipedia you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:Criticism of Wikipedia for reasons why
the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
TompaDompa --
TompaDompa (
talk) 21:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed that you nominated the article Ideological bias on Wikipedia for WP:Good article status. You do not appear to have edited the article prior to this, and there is no discussion about nominating the article on its talk page. It used to be the case that anybody could nominate an article, but it was decided back in January to only allow editors who have significantly contributed to the article to nominate it (see Wikipedia talk:Good Article proposal drive 2023#Proposal 11: Ban drive-by nominations for the discussion that led to this change and Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions for further details). I have consequently removed the nomination for now. Consider discussing whether the article is ready to be nominated with the article's principal editors on the talk page. TompaDompa ( talk) 21:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Is "undue integrity" bad or good? Doug Weller talk 08:24, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
![]() |
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've
begun reviewing the article
Criticism of Wikipedia you nominated for
GA-status according to the
criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
TompaDompa --
TompaDompa (
talk) 21:23, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi 3vvww661! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at
Criticism of Wikipedia that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as
typo corrections or reverting obvious
vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see
Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you.
TompaDompa (
talk) 21:26, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
The article
Criticism of Wikipedia you nominated as a
good article has failed ; see
Talk:Criticism of Wikipedia for reasons why
the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by
ChristieBot, on behalf of
TompaDompa --
TompaDompa (
talk) 21:43, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Hi! I noticed that you nominated the article Ideological bias on Wikipedia for WP:Good article status. You do not appear to have edited the article prior to this, and there is no discussion about nominating the article on its talk page. It used to be the case that anybody could nominate an article, but it was decided back in January to only allow editors who have significantly contributed to the article to nominate it (see Wikipedia talk:Good Article proposal drive 2023#Proposal 11: Ban drive-by nominations for the discussion that led to this change and Wikipedia:Good article nominations/Instructions for further details). I have consequently removed the nomination for now. Consider discussing whether the article is ready to be nominated with the article's principal editors on the talk page. TompaDompa ( talk) 21:48, 10 August 2023 (UTC)
Is "undue integrity" bad or good? Doug Weller talk 08:24, 12 August 2023 (UTC)
Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive | ![]() |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
| |
You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |