From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

@ Mabuska: I have seen your SPI report. Here is my response.

Since September I seem to be the focus point for a certain editors attention.

How? You have not substantiated that claim. Yes you have been reverted a few times, so what? I am sure there are a number of times were in a 2 month period you have reverted edits by me multiple times.

4 Special:Contributions/47.90.85.47 didn't really do any harrasing,

I know this is not relevant here but I feel the need to debunk this just in case I am blamed. What has happened between you and these ips is not harassment. You make a mockery of actual harassment by calling a one-off poor attempt at trolling and reverting your edits harassment. You do not need any reminding when I tell you that you reverted many of my edits, does that make you a harasser?

. They also had a run in with @Rms125a@hotmail.com: who is banned from Apollo's talk page,

The guy called someone a fenian, who would not take issue with that?

strong reason for a grudge against me considering I was opposed to many of their highly dubious and POV driven edits and filed the original SPI against them, they are the most likely candidate.

let me ask you this, have I ever been disrespectful to you? The answer to this is no. 36.81.90.48 ( talk) 16:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Your selective responses only further arouse my suspicions. And yes you were disrespectable quite a lot especially with your ignoring of WP:BRD and trying to force your edits into articles and citing made up non existent concensus' on talk pages despite the objections of me and other editors. Not all disrespect has to be vulgar words. Mabuska (talk) 16:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Mabuska:Your selective responses only further arouse my suspicions What selective responses?

And yes you were disrespectable quite a lot especially with your ignoring of WP:BRD and trying to force your edits into articles and citing made up non existent concensus' on talk pages despite the objections of me and other editors. Not all disrespect has to be vulgar words.

Can you give some examples that dont include edit warring? 36.81.90.48 ( talk) 16:48, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply


From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

@ Mabuska: I have seen your SPI report. Here is my response.

Since September I seem to be the focus point for a certain editors attention.

How? You have not substantiated that claim. Yes you have been reverted a few times, so what? I am sure there are a number of times were in a 2 month period you have reverted edits by me multiple times.

4 Special:Contributions/47.90.85.47 didn't really do any harrasing,

I know this is not relevant here but I feel the need to debunk this just in case I am blamed. What has happened between you and these ips is not harassment. You make a mockery of actual harassment by calling a one-off poor attempt at trolling and reverting your edits harassment. You do not need any reminding when I tell you that you reverted many of my edits, does that make you a harasser?

. They also had a run in with @Rms125a@hotmail.com: who is banned from Apollo's talk page,

The guy called someone a fenian, who would not take issue with that?

strong reason for a grudge against me considering I was opposed to many of their highly dubious and POV driven edits and filed the original SPI against them, they are the most likely candidate.

let me ask you this, have I ever been disrespectful to you? The answer to this is no. 36.81.90.48 ( talk) 16:02, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply

Your selective responses only further arouse my suspicions. And yes you were disrespectable quite a lot especially with your ignoring of WP:BRD and trying to force your edits into articles and citing made up non existent concensus' on talk pages despite the objections of me and other editors. Not all disrespect has to be vulgar words. Mabuska (talk) 16:40, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply

@ Mabuska:Your selective responses only further arouse my suspicions What selective responses?

And yes you were disrespectable quite a lot especially with your ignoring of WP:BRD and trying to force your edits into articles and citing made up non existent concensus' on talk pages despite the objections of me and other editors. Not all disrespect has to be vulgar words.

Can you give some examples that dont include edit warring? 36.81.90.48 ( talk) 16:48, 23 October 2017 (UTC) reply



Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook