Please avoid using Indic script, e.g. Bengali names, in the lead section and infobox. See WP:NOINDICSCRIPT for policy and reasons. Thank you Adakiko ( talk) 04:35, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Sirajganj District, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Adakiko (
talk)
05:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Sirajganj. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adakiko ( talk) 06:26, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at
Chauhali Upazila, you may be
blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.
Adakiko (
talk)
06:28, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the
Manual of Style, as you did at
Belkuchi Upazila.
Adakiko (
talk)
06:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sauraved, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Worldbruce ( talk) 07:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Girth Summit
(blether)
08:50, 9 February 2022 (UTC)Please avoid using Indic script, e.g. Bengali names, in the lead section and infobox. See WP:NOINDICSCRIPT for policy and reasons. Thank you Adakiko ( talk) 04:35, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of
your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to
Sirajganj District, did not appear to be constructive and have been
reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our
policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our
welcome page which also provides further information about
contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your
sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on
my talk page. Thank you.
Adakiko (
talk)
05:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at
Sirajganj. Your edits appear to be
disruptive and have been or will be
reverted.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adakiko ( talk) 06:26, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your
disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at
Chauhali Upazila, you may be
blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia
Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason.
Adakiko (
talk)
06:28, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
You may be
blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make disruptive edits to Wikipedia contrary to the
Manual of Style, as you did at
Belkuchi Upazila.
Adakiko (
talk)
06:33, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Sauraved, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. Worldbruce ( talk) 07:06, 9 February 2022 (UTC)
{{
unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.
Girth Summit
(blether)
08:50, 9 February 2022 (UTC)